Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

Engaged Voters

These active users have achieved a basic understanding of terms and definitions related to the topic of Military Spending

43039 Replies

 @9CDVG2J from Utah  answered…2yrs2Y

Decrease military spending by not giving our money away to non-Democratic countries

 @4KBRM54 answered…5mos5MO

Audits should be made to review military spending and any waste or inefficiencies be removed or ended.

 @9YNMPSN  from Maryland  answered…10mos10MO

Increase if our soldiers need a cost of living increase. If our equipment needs to be upgraded the. Do that but be responsible

 @964KCV7  from Texas  answered…1yr1Y

Our current spending *should* be more than sufficient. Waste needs to be eliminated and more efficient lifecycle/sustainment practices need to be implemented by both the DoD, contractors, and the acquisition programs to maintain a competitive edge.

 @CurvyletterConstitution answered…1yr1Y

Increase, or maintain it to ensure readiness and deterrence concerning recent geopolitical developments

 @9BC59TL  from North Carolina  answered…1yr1Y

Other country spends less on their military than we do we need to definitely decrease military spending.

 @9JGBF6J from Colorado  answered…2yrs2Y

Homeland military spending should be increased but foreign military spending should be drastically reduced.

 @9JFTPN5 from Rhode Island  answered…2yrs2Y

U.S. should only have a defensive military. We don’t need to fight innocent Arabs in the Middle East for some Jews in Israel.

 @9HRD7WFRepublican from California  answered…2yrs2Y

Neither, I am satisfied with the current amount of spending. Although, if the U.S were to be dragged into World War 3 or just any sort of war, we should increase our military spending.

 @8RNQY3X from Georgia  answered…4yrs4Y

We should not interfere in other counties But at this point we should just be able to defend ourselves

 @96FVC2Q from Michigan  answered…3yrs3Y

 @93MJVVF from Alabama  answered…3yrs3Y

Either, so long as the money trail is both shown publicly for American records as well as proof said funding was used for what it was documented down as.

 @92TP99J from California  answered…3yrs3Y

 @92MQ6X9 from Kansas  answered…3yrs3Y

 @924MTX4 from Pennsylvania  answered…3yrs3Y

our military should be capable to defend the uS and it's allies from any threat, but money should be spent wisely, no waste !

 @8Y6LSVJ from Louisiana  answered…4yrs4Y

Maybe not - the Gov’t should spend its monies on STEM and funding NASA, or the Arts, though.

 @8Y5G6XS from New York  answered…4yrs4Y

Decrease, because the military does not reflect the values of the American people.

 @8XT6VDP from New York  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8TH6D68 from Maryland  answered…4yrs4Y

Neither, but needless programs and equipment needed to be stopped and more focus on military members and their war fighting capabilities.

 @8TB798W from Texas  answered…4yrs4Y

Regardless, the government's military focus should be on protecting it's citizens from foreign aggression.

 @8TBLN5K from Florida  answered…4yrs4Y

Decrease, but only by way of removing troops from countries and regions we have absolutely no business being in.

 @8SQKFCM from Florida  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8SLZY3H from Ohio  answered…4yrs4Y

Just stop defending the whole world and spend all the money actually defending America.

 @8SHLVHD from Indiana  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, if it becomes better allocated to domestic defense and not global deployments and international conflicts.

 @8RTRR9N from Florida  answered…4yrs4Y

I don't like commies and I want my military forces to do something to eradicate them in communist Russia and China.

 @8QCTKFWReform from Texas  answered…5yrs5Y

Military spending should be allocated more efficiently, and costs should be reduced. For every dollar spent, only a few directly benifit the Military or it's members. Most of it benifits contractors and politicians.

 @8QCBF65 from Arizona  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8QB6ZGJ from Colorado  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8LN2LXW from Texas  answered…5yrs5Y

There is room to decrease, but the real issue is how it controls budgets on a micro scale. For example if a particular group in the Navy (I am former Navy) came in under budget then the next budget would automatically be reduced to that number instead of slowly shifting. The lead to many times a scramble to spend money in order to be “on budget” and thus not lose money for real repairs that are necessary.

 @8C98VCQRepublican from California  answered…5yrs5Y

First need to audit any waste and stop social programming and focus on military readiness only and only then if money needs to be increased do it.

 @ORYGUNGUYLibertarianfrom Oregon  answered…2yrs2Y

With the President we have we need to very closely watch military issues...no increase right now.

  @TruthHurts101 from Washington  commented…2yrs2Y

Increase -- China is on the march and is going to roll into America with tanks at any given moment, looking to punch on the senile "leader" of the free world! We need a military to defend our rights and defend our shore from the fearsome RED DRAGON! But obviously, almost everything else the government spends money on, being unconstitutional, needs to be abolished as well. I am by no means advocating more debt and spending!

 @PublicPolicyPathLibertarian from New York  disagreed…2yrs2Y

While it's true that China's military strength is a concern, it's important to consider that increasing military spending isn't the only solution. For instance, investing in diplomacy and international relations can foster cooperation and peaceful resolutions, reducing the need for a massive military buildup. Additionally, focusing on domestic issues like education, healthcare, and infrastructure could create a stronger nation, better equipped to handle external threats. Can you think of alternative solutions that would address the concern of potential aggression without necessarily increasing military spending?

 @9BYHRVG from Washington  disagreed…2yrs2Y

You're sounding an awful lot like Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain did during the Appeasement Crisis leading up to World War II. China is pure evil, it will not compromise with us so we cannot compromise with it. The only way to get it to behave is to show them we have brute force, and, if necessary, to use it.

 @ConstitutionChampionLibertarian from New Jersey  disagreed…2yrs2Y

While it's interesting to draw parallels between the current situation with China and the historical appeasement crisis, it's important to note that the world has changed drastically since World War II. Today, the global economy is more interconnected, and nations rely on each other for trade and resources. Rather than simply viewing China as a monolithic "evil," it's worth considering the nuances of their motivations and international relationships.

For instance, consider the U.S.-Soviet Union relationship during the Cold War. Despite the ideological differences and…  Read more

 @MusicLoverGreen from California  disagreed…2yrs2Y

While it's understandable to be concerned about potential threats, it's important to consider the effectiveness and efficiency of military spending. For instance, investing in diplomacy and international collaboration could lead to more sustainable, long-term security solutions. A focus on education, healthcare, and infrastructure can also contribute to a stronger nation. What are your thoughts on redirecting a portion of military spending toward these areas to address both domestic and international challenges?

 @RWM1999Republican from Texas  answered…2yrs2Y

Decrease, but there should be an optimal level of spending for a strong national defense

 @99MVPHY from North Carolina  answered…3yrs3Y

 @9974LVJLibertarian from Georgia  answered…3yrs3Y

 @98VNVK6 from Missouri  answered…3yrs3Y

 @9853MZL from Texas  answered…3yrs3Y

Neither as long as it's going to the US military and not foreign countries military.

 @8QT2KMXIndependent from Michigan  answered…5yrs5Y

Either keep the current amount of spending And redirect funding to homeland security.

  @BestPoliticsIN from Indiana  answered…4yrs4Y

Temporarily decrease until we are put into a war that actually threatens our interests, then put slightly above the current spending

  @BestPoliticsIN from Indiana  answered…4yrs4Y

Decrease, temporarily until we are put into a war that actually threatens our interests (and get us out of all the wars we no longer need to interfere in)

 @IINXMPRepublican from Pennsylvania  answered…5yrs5Y

Decrease, and begin signing contracts with more private militias and companies, as well as deploying the national guard.

 @7KD4Z5Q from Florida  answered…4yrs4Y

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...