Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

Engaged Voters

These active users have achieved a basic understanding of terms and definitions related to the topic of Military Spending

43064 Replies

 @B62H9SFSocialist from Alabama  answered…2mos2MO

the current level of spending is ok if it can be justified and the pentagon can be audited to assure that what is being spent is actually of reasonable value

 @9WVVVVYForward  from Hawaii  answered…11mos11MO

Decrease. I'm not against the military in general, but I think we could divert some of the spending on it to more important issues at home.

 @9XGL7B8Green from Minnesota  answered…11mos11MO

we should first minimize waste of funding in the military, and to ensure that veterans are taken care of

 @9WMRGRRSocialist from New York  answered…11mos11MO

Keep it where it is, and focus on other areas that need help and are struggling like education, healthcare, etc.

 @9VPB3GTSocialist from New York  answered…11mos11MO

The military should only be allowed enough funds that they are 100% able to account for with consistent public audits.

 @9VL54W9Socialist from New York  answered…11mos11MO

I do think military spending in the U.S. is extreme but I have heard things that make me unsure. For example, I know that a lot of military spending goes toward scientific advancements.

 @9VGZR67Socialist from Minnesota  answered…12mos12MO

i do belive that the government should decrese military spending, but only because i beleive that a lot of the money going to the military can go to better places, like the school system and healthcare.

 @9VFRM8LGreen from Iowa  answered…12mos12MO

Sort of, we are dealing with inflation, and military spending is one way to use extra taxpayer money.

 @9TWTP9JGreen from Georgia  answered…12mos12MO

our military needs to be revised in general, and decrease in spending for torture procedures and the brainwashing and violence against humans in the field

 @9TNNSSVGreen from South Carolina  answered…12mos12MO

I believe we should keep our military strong but try to prevent more wars with words and not gunfire.

 @9SS5X2QSocialist from California  answered…1yr1Y

Decrease funding specifically the $800 billion dollars spent annually on battleships that aren’t in use or relevant anymore

 @9SDVP69Green from California  answered…1yr1Y

Depends on what the world is looking like but government should not be worrying about other countries military

 @9SCRMV8Socialist from Illinois  answered…1yr1Y

If the military budget is getting in the way of other services then it should be decreased, but our military power has been what's kept America safe from invasion for so long.

 @9S93G7WSocialist from Texas  answered…1yr1Y

Decrease foreign military spending, keep domestic the same only increase in the wake of decreased foreign intervention.

 @9RZ3BXBSocialist from Louisiana  answered…1yr1Y

I think we should find a way to decrease spending whilst still being able to stay at the top of the food chain that in case of a massive threat, we still hold power over them.

 @9RVMV5DSocialist from New York  answered…1yr1Y

We are arguably capable of being able to fund a our military and have the social welfare programs we deserve if we can’t then maybe we should find a way to met our treaty obligations without having such an insane defense budjet

 @9R7JHW5Socialist from Texas  answered…1yr1Y

Decrease, until more money is being given to active and veteran members and in maintaining their well-being, we should not give more money to military spending

 @9R74254Green from Oklahoma  answered…1yr1Y

Depends on the situation at hand, if nothing of importance is going on then no, unless the spending is explicitly used for improvement on equipment or training.

 @9MCMHZBSocialist from Texas  answered…1yr1Y

Should only contribute tax money partially towards the Military, and instead the rest goes to pay of universal dept.

 @9MBS6RGSocialist  from Iowa  answered…1yr1Y

Decrease, especially with the current multi-year streak of the Pentagon failing their audits without consequences.

 @9LV3622Socialist  from Illinois  answered…1yr1Y

Stop funding the military-industrial complex, combat profiteering, and raise base pay for lower-enlisted service members.

 @9LN9XVVSocialist from Connecticut  answered…1yr1Y

Decrease gradually, transferring those funds to social programs and infrastructure including putting veterans to work on even more infrastructure projects.

 @9LKQLY8Socialist from California  answered…1yr1Y

I feel as if the military spending is okay but we should invest in our veterans we need better programs and should increase the funding in regards to mental and physical health as well as shelter for veterans or those honorably discharged.

 @9KMPFYTSocialist from Minnesota  answered…2yrs2Y

Military spending should be distributed to other things, like homelessness, food, and financial services to education, and once these are substantial, then military spending can retain the rate it is at.

 @9KJJMDCSocialist from Rhode Island  answered…2yrs2Y

Increase due to the tensions, but not to be used to engage in conflict immediately. Just to hold in spending, less investment in nuclear warfare, however.

 @9KGR8BGSocialist from Pennsylvania  answered…2yrs2Y

Decrease to an amount that would still be good, but enough so social issues like homelessness can be more focused on.

 @9KDR5RSSocialist from Ohio  answered…2yrs2Y

Depends, it is okay to increase spending in times or war but apart from that, they should be lowered

 @5MWNQSWGreen  from New York  answered…2yrs2Y

The government should audit the armed forces and increase current accountability measures, tackle wasteful spending, and ensure all current funding is being used at maximum efficiency.

 @9K29KTRGreen from Missouri  answered…2yrs2Y

They allow spending to go to the wrong places, although if they allocated it in a better way, with better records. It would be good to increase spending.

 @9JVQMLVSocialist from Washington  answered…2yrs2Y

Decrease, the US does not need such a large military, its only purpose is power projection and interfering in the affairs of sovereign nations, which is inherently undemocratic.

 @9J3SVT2Socialist from Delaware  answered…2yrs2Y

Decrease, and invest that money into social welfare projects (Public Transit, Public Infrastructure, etc)

 @9HQTBGXSocialist  from Oregon  answered…2yrs2Y

The military should reprioritize current funding to develop systems that can address peer/near-pear future threats.

 @9HMT2TWSocialist  from California  answered…2yrs2Y

We need to reduce military spending to 30% of its current size, it is not necessary to spend this amount of taxpayer money on the military especially when we are running a deficit as big as we currently are

 @9HKJR48Green from Illinois  answered…2yrs2Y

Cut the funding by a little bit and redirect spending on better treatment of the military, stricter regulations, and better training.

 @9HF3Y9VGreen from North Carolina  answered…2yrs2Y

I think we should only increase money if the area of the military is of current use, if it is not currently as relevant as other areas it should decrease.

 @9H9ZDV9Greenanswered…2yrs2Y

It really depends because at times the military doesn't really need that much money, however, it times of crisis it needs more funding

 @9H8MS8FGreenanswered…2yrs2Y

the governments shold go throw periods where they decrease spending wall the have a steady amount in reserved.

 @9GV9W3WSocialist from Texas  answered…2yrs2Y

I think we should pay our people more, if we do increase the spending, for serving our country and veterans after they get out, especially if they're wounded in action.

 @9GQT4NRSocialist from Virginia  answered…2yrs2Y

They have enough money but they should make it harder to get in because the military doesn't have very good recruits currently in my opinion.

 @9GMS7RPSocialist from Texas  answered…2yrs2Y

Depends, should be the outcome of a paradigm shift in how we approach foreign threats versus internal national security threats were we compare the two and think in terms of the long-term alongside the short term.

 @9GJFYPFSocialist from Ohio  answered…2yrs2Y

Spend a majority of the budget on helping military members readjust to life out of service. Provide jobs, housing, mental health care, and information to reintegrate into society.

 @9GBZKFTGreen from Texas  answered…2yrs2Y

decrease, distribute the money to different areas in our government that we’re struggling with (public transport, education, homeless problem)

 @9GBD8D5Socialist from California  answered…2yrs2Y

It should be decreased and the funding that is cut should be moved to more social programs to help benefit lower income individuals.

 @9GB3JKRGreen from Indiana  answered…2yrs2Y

decrease but only in terms of high budget military projects that have no actual budget monitoring. or guarantee of being useful.

 @9G644HKSocialist from Utah  answered…2yrs2Y

we need to budget better the government has a history of overpaying for stuff. but keep it about the same.

 @9G3P86NSocialist from North Carolina  answered…2yrs2Y

I think that it is not bad to build the military, but we have a large one that we do not use often. It is okay to slow down if need be.

 @9FZ7WLQSocialist from New Jersey  answered…2yrs2Y

Military spending should be considered AFTER essential needs are addressed for most ( housing, health, education, etc)

 @9FP2YQPSocialistanswered…2yrs2Y

The amount isn't the problem, it's where the money is going (and NOT going) that's a problem.

 @9FKQJS6Green from Wisconsin  answered…2yrs2Y

I don't really know what to answer but I guess decrease spending altogether if it's not important

 @9FJK39LGreen from Utah  answered…2yrs2Y

If other countries Pay their nato then we should lower it, but if they don't then we should maintain or higher.

 @9FHP7FRGreen from Nebraska  answered…2yrs2Y

Only when it's necessary/beneficial to our current state as a country dealing with the threat of a foreign invasion or attack.

 @9FGRY69Green from Texas  answered…2yrs2Y

It should increase to help our people at home…but not to serve foreign interests.

 @9FDYJ8ZSocialist from Pennsylvania  answered…2yrs2Y

In moments of war i believe they should be spending whatever they can to win

 @9FD599QSocialist from Kansas  answered…2yrs2Y

They need to focus more of the funds into the actual soldiers for things such as mental health, and not into the machines

 @9FCQLXGGreen from Texas  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9F6RLV7Socialistanswered…2yrs2Y

We should keep the military budget not too high because we are not at war and if we don't go to war for a long time we will need to update our weapons causing us to spend more and not need the older military weapons because they don't work as well in combat.

 @9F5FJQGSocialist from Texas  answered…2yrs2Y

I only support it if the government is defending the worker's international revolution

 @9F2R5FGGreen from Virginia  answered…2yrs2Y

Decrease and invest it into infastructure, education, and other public services.

 @9DZLF7ZSocialist from Pennsylvania  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9DZKSC3Green from Mississippi  answered…2yrs2Y

We need to evaluate what speeding is being used for and then divert funds to appropriate departments.

 @9DXGGL3Socialistfrom Northern Mariana Islands  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9DFVXJ2Socialist from Maryland  answered…2yrs2Y

Decrease, but only after Europe and other allies can fully defend themselvs.

 @9DBL3BGGreen from Maine  answered…2yrs2Y

Decrease after a full audit system is setup to eliminate waste & graft first. VA & Military benefits need to be increased.

 @9DBKBVLGreen from Colorado  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9D7VMMDSocialistfrom Guam  answered…2yrs2Y

Decrease, then divert the decrease on healthcare, welfare, and social security.

 @9T3L7W8Green from Florida  answered…1yr1Y

it should be decreased millions go into the military yet many things soldiers still have to pay out of there pockets to get things that are required

 @9CNN37JSocialist from Georgia  answered…2yrs2Y

Increase VA funding significantly. If we can afford troops we can afford Veterans .

 @9CNLMD5Greenfrom Guam  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9CGVC45Socialist from California  answered…2yrs2Y

Decrease, and spend that money on healthcare, education and welfare instead

 @9BWNBVJSocialist from Texas  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9BSGHSSGreen from North Carolina  answered…2yrs2Y

Decrease, and work to convince other countries to decrease them as well

 @9B2P4Q2Socialist from Massachusetts  answered…2yrs2Y

Decrease and redistribute the funding after more proper vetting of corruption.

 @99XCTLTSocialist from Maryland  answered…2yrs2Y

Major increase. we should become an even bigger military that can conquest places for resources.

 @99CYMBNGreen from Georgia  answered…3yrs3Y

Maintain current levels, redirect budget towards veterans affairs and repurposing old assets.

 @96J7QWZSocialistfrom Maine  answered…3yrs3Y

diminuire, è l'esercito dovrebbe essere pesantemente riformato e de potenziato e con molti limiti

 @96J5JQMSocialist from Texas  answered…3yrs3Y

Decrease or remain the same -- Current spending should be analyzed first; many products are sold to the government at marked-up prices simply because they can, and many department budgets for all branches of service are based on the usage of the previous year, resulting in usage of money that the military didn't really need there, whereas another department could have utilized it to service members' benefit.

 @96DDZBVSocialist from Washington D.C.  answered…3yrs3Y

Should be kept the same but redistributed after an audit to ensure efficiency.

 @96882BVSocialist from Michigan  answered…3yrs3Y

They should change the areas in which the money is being spent. They should pay for better housing and pay workers more.

 @966QRVQGreen from Georgia  answered…3yrs3Y

Decrease, as many of our military programs are either unnecessary or inefficient

 @965SJ4FSocialist from Maryland  answered…3yrs3Y

They should overhaul the financial structure of the military to make it more efficient

 @963CQHFSocialist from Virginia  answered…3yrs3Y

The U.S Government should increase OR decrease depending on the situation.

 @95Z7XJQGreen from Minnesota  answered…3yrs3Y

I think they should be more frugal in some areas but the amount is fine with me.

 @95TKLX6Socialist from Arkansas  answered…3yrs3Y

 @95TGDVMSocialist from Kentucky  answered…3yrs3Y

Abolish the offensive military and only have a defense force that can contribute to UN actions if needed

 @95RNXB7Socialist from Washington  answered…3yrs3Y

Change the way the money is spent, learn to utilize it better instead of wasting tons of it.

 @95RKR3PSocialist from Maryland  answered…3yrs3Y

 @95RDX55Socialist from Illinois  answered…3yrs3Y

Increase in support of VA support, and troop training. Decrease in support of military industrial complex, and 3rd party DOD contractors.

 @95R83NSSocialist from Indiana  answered…3yrs3Y

This questions is far more complicated than can be easily tackled. In general it should be decreased but new agencies that advance technology should be made.

 @95R7WVMSocialist from Missouri  answered…3yrs3Y

 @95QHP8VSocialist from South Carolina  answered…3yrs3Y

 @95JPXTFSocialist from California  answered…3yrs3Y

It should be decreased, but not by too much as there are real threats to the world that necessitate a strong US military right now.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...