Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

Engaged Voters

These active users have achieved a basic understanding of terms and definitions related to the topic of Military Spending

43043 Replies

 @9SYW3HV from Michigan  answered…1yr1Y

Decrease, keep enough spending to maintain and grow the military to combat other countries, but it should be re invested into like development of the country.

 @B6TNHDYLibertarian from Michigan  answered…1wk1W

So long as we can afford it military defense spending is limitless and should be encouraged as one of the 4 essential functions of government per Milton Friedman.

 @3yh33h3Independent from Michigan  answered…4wks4W

Increase, but do more to make sure it's not squandered on drastically overbudget or wasteful programs, like the Littoral Combat Ship as an example

 @B65MT42Independent from Michigan  answered…2mos2MO

I dont think I am qualified to really have an opinion on for I fear the effects of the decrease in spending but at the same time find the exhorbitant spending ridiculous

 @B5X4V9CConstitution from Michigan  answered…3mos3MO

Increase, because what just happened with Iran just proves how on edge the world has become (better safe than sorry).

 @B5WTF7Y from Michigan  answered…3mos3MO

Neither, keep it the same but better allocate the funding to the soldiers and vets in need. and spend less on defense contactors

 @B5QDB6V from Michigan  answered…3mos3MO

i think military spending should be geared toward research of new military technology and technology that would more efficiently and quickly produce said technology if needed in an instant

 @B5M8WZS from Michigan  answered…4mos4MO

AUDIT THE DEFENSE DEPARTMENT, and no new defense dollars until they can pass multiple audits subsequently

 @B55XZPL from Michigan  answered…5mos5MO

I think if there was a war or something we should increase it but like right now I don't see a need in increasing it

 @B4ZSXLY from Michigan  answered…5mos5MO

Military spending should be reviewed annually. We need a strong military however contracts for the military should be opened up for review and not limited to the few select suppliers

 @B4LLPJ2Independent from Michigan  answered…5mos5MO

its hard to say because as of now we don't really need it as much but what if we do get in a war we will probably.

 @B4DT5HN from Michigan  answered…5mos5MO

I would have said decrease, but now that our government has made other countries angry, probably not. keep it the same for now

 @B4DL2VB from Michigan  answered…5mos5MO

for now maybe increase i dont think things are going to greap with trump being friends with Putin I think this could go wrong super fast

 @B3Z4NCD  from Michigan  answered…6mos6MO

I think that important things like health care should be given a bigger funding, to better match our military.

 @B3VZS8L from Michigan  answered…6mos6MO

I think that military spending is relative to what is going on. for example if we are in a war or assisting another countries we should increase it but if we are in a time of peace then we should just keep it the same.

 @B3PSK5F from Michigan  answered…6mos6MO

I think the united states should increase it to obviously like fight our enemies but at the same time I feel like us gets to involved in foreign conflicts that it has nothing to do with and it just ends up killing more people. so I would Increase it if there were guarantees the USould not get involved in conflicts it does not need to get involved in.

 @B3N8WX4 from Michigan  answered…6mos6MO

Economically it wouldn't be wise to increase the budget, but we have to look at what other countries, like China, are doing and how far behind or ahead they are in certain categories based off their budget.

 @B3N675CDemocrat from Michigan  answered…6mos6MO

Decrease, our military budget is bloated. Military spending should not be allowed to surpass 1/2 of the national GDP.

 @B3MZGBSLibertarian from Michigan  answered…6mos6MO

Neither, audit and remove all waste and fraud. Use the new found money to advance our interest or pay down the deficit.

 @B3DHMBV from Michigan  answered…7mos7MO

overhaul the MIC's contract system and hold these companies to higher standards for said contracts, which should drastically reduce waste

 @B34CJNM from Michigan  answered…7mos7MO

I think they should decrease certain areas like vehicles, not infantry, because our vehicles are already far superior other than the big weak spot on the abrams

 @B2WLBKJ from Michigan  answered…7mos7MO

Increase and/or reallocate, with the goal of better quality of life improvements for enlisteds and infrastructure

 @B2LTD8W from Michigan  answered…8mos8MO

Remove inefficiencies, and spending will be reduced as a consequence. We should, however, be in a permanent war-time economy, until every country become as free as America.

 @B2KDH7B from Michigan  answered…8mos8MO

I think it should stay as it is neutral. they already spend enough money on military and we shouldn't spend less because military is our national defense.

 @B2HDW6K from Michigan  answered…8mos8MO

It depends on the state of the world. If there are multiple wars that could affect us, yes we need increased spending. But when there is peace, we don't need money. Spending should decrease heavily.

 @B2CMHQQ from Michigan  answered…8mos8MO

I feel like spending less but keeping enough to stay ahead or maintain the advancements of other countries.

 @B2CDQ9Z from Michigan  answered…8mos8MO

i believe that if they need more they should spend more to keep us safe if not then they should stay the same.

 @B268J38 from Michigan  answered…9mos9MO

I think they should keep it the same because if you increase it, most of the money is put to waste unless we're in war. If you decrease the budget, then it would weaken our military

 @9ZWKGCC from Michigan  answered…10mos10MO

Perform major audit, over many years of necessary, and restructure finances to departments that need and deserve funding

 @9ZNXW7YWomen’s Equality from Michigan  answered…10mos10MO

It depends if there is a chance of attack if its on the brick of war then increase spending but if not the do not increase spending

 @9ZK7Y9J from Michigan  answered…10mos10MO

There should be a certain amount of spending, if we go into war, yes increase spending, but in time of peace money could be put towards other programs. They should also work to pay the people working more and make reusable military weapons.

 @9ZD6CJW from Michigan  answered…10mos10MO

The government should manage military spending better by reducing waste and relying less on private companies

 @9YHMKXS from Michigan  answered…10mos10MO

I am neither satisfied nor dissatisfied with how much the Us government spends on military budget although I do believe less spending could potentially open the door up for more money to the US citizens rather it be for roads, schools, housing etc.

 @9YBNBS4 from Michigan  answered…10mos10MO

we already spend more than everyone else so we do not need to raise it but we also shouldn't decrease because we do not want to fall behind

 @9Y748VF from Michigan  answered…10mos10MO

We need to stop giving weapons and money to other countries and focus on our country and our weapons and our money for the military.

 @9Y6TZ2JWomen’s Equality  from Michigan  answered…10mos10MO

I think that the military is a very useful resource so i think it should have a decent spending but to only increase it when need not because its a want but only if necessary

 @9Y6JPZ3 from Michigan  answered…10mos10MO

I think they should shift their focus and money somewhere else. I don't think they should stop spending money on the military (that's part of why America is feared) but I wish they would spend money on other things too.

 @9Y5WCRS from Michigan  answered…10mos10MO

Decrease overall spending. Raise direct compensation levels of service members. Focus on innovation and upgrades, while reducing spending on overseas bases.

 @9XXTMNW from Michigan  answered…10mos10MO

We should only increase military spending if we know war is bound to happen to OUR country, not Israel or any other countries.

 @9XXSCLR from Michigan  answered…10mos10MO

It depends, it should be enough to fight back if war. But public education should get more money for the lunches like in other countries

 @9XTFZWB from Michigan  answered…10mos10MO

Increase, but only if its for the safety of solders in the military not sending money to another country.

 @9XTBBNY from Michigan  answered…10mos10MO

Most likely not, since almost every state has a nuclear warhead which could destroy the world in a matter of seconds, which would scare people too much and not start any wars and such, but in other cases, maybe increase it a little.

 @9XT86SJ from Michigan  answered…10mos10MO

We put a lot of money into military spending so we should instead take 2 months of military spending out of the year and put it forward to infrastructural repair.

 @9XSX38NRepublican from Michigan  answered…10mos10MO

the United states has the best military in the world I say they keep spending but not as crazy as they are.

 @9XQS7CV from Michigan  answered…10mos10MO

Depends on what it's being spent on, the people should know where every tax dollar goes and what its spent on

 @9XKZ2CH from Michigan  answered…11mos11MO

Military spending on other countries fights should be reduced. But our own military power should stay strong and if that means increasing money I would support that

 @9XKPL4C from Michigan  answered…11mos11MO

the military is what protects us so let them use what they need to but tell them when it is too much

 @9XJLRJM from Michigan  answered…11mos11MO

You increase in the places it is really badly needed but keep it the same in the places it is not as badly needed

 @9XFPW9NNo Labels from Michigan  answered…11mos11MO

decrease by billions of dollars we are wasting money on stupid things that don't work and for wars that are little and have nothing to do with us.

 @9XCH4QH from Michigan  answered…11mos11MO

Decrease, The government should review military equipment contracts to ensure we are getting a fair price

 @9X833C6No Labels from Michigan  answered…11mos11MO

Specific parts of the military may need more funding but increasing overall does not guarantee those parts get what they need. No to a blind increase; yes to needed programs.

 @9WYLZGB from Michigan  answered…11mos11MO

We should have a need base as well as a percentage but the federal government is not the funding for the whole world as it seems to be currently.

 @9WXJ3H9 from Michigan  answered…11mos11MO

Increase spending that benefits current military personnel and their families and veterans. Spending on technology and systems improvements should be focused on keeping our troops safer and limiting civilian casualties in any conflicts.

 @9WXDFRMPeace and Freedom  from Michigan  answered…11mos11MO

People who are in the military should get paid more not buying all of the stuff that the military should get try and use the old ones.

 @9WWFBP8 from Michigan  answered…11mos11MO

If we're at war, or there is a present danger, then yeah increase it, but if not, lower it somewhat to be able to fund other things. It's not a bad thing to be prepared, but you also don't need to overpack for a trip.

 @9WJY9KFConstitution from Michigan  answered…11mos11MO

Our military should have funds to be the best it can be without overspending as it protects our constitution.

 @9WDY54Q from Michigan  answered…11mos11MO

it depends, i feel like this will tend to fluctuate a lot and it out of peoples control for the most part. they need what they need and don't what they don't

 @9W2S37S from Michigan  answered…11mos11MO

Stop giving money to other countries, then limit ours a little. We don’t need to soend this much .

 @9DHGFPDIndependent  from Michigan  answered…11mos11MO

Neither, am I satisfied with the current spending, but prioritize veterans programs more than they are currently instead of weapons.

 @9VRY4J6 from Michigan  answered…11mos11MO

I think they should spend the amount needed to increase our tech but not spending an unnecessary amount.

 @9VPGHKH from Michigan  answered…11mos11MO

No, but spending needs reforms. More should be allocated to military salary, healthcare, and veterans support.

 @9VJT945 from Michigan  answered…11mos11MO

Yes, if the military defense is used at home for projects such as building bridges and infrastructure improvements

 @9VHW3GS from Michigan  answered…11mos11MO

increase but stop over charging the military for necessary equipment and tech and misappropriating funds. Stop selling weapons to foreign governments so we are not fighting against our own tech.

 @9VGM944 from Michigan  answered…11mos11MO

Neither, but we also need to have better auditing and accounting so that personnel wages can be increased.

 @9VD4355 from Michigan  answered…12mos12MO

The government should eliminate military spending from the budget by issuing letters of marque and reprisal.

 @9VCZKWP from Michigan  answered…12mos12MO

Increase, but only if it benefits the United States, unlike Biden and Kamala sending billions of dollars in milliratry grade utilities and equipment to Ukraine.

 @9V9NYW9 from Michigan  answered…12mos12MO

Keep it the same or spend a little less sense we have a lot of resources that we don’t use because they are extra

 @9V59QNJ from Michigan  answered…12mos12MO

I think we need a better itemized list of everything purchased. There's no way nearly $1 trillion is being used and all going to programs or funding military projects.

 @9V4BS93 from Michigan  answered…12mos12MO

Should decrease, but can maintain if a full and transparent audit and accounting has been completed and is repeated on a regular basis

 @9TWH66Q from Michigan  answered…12mos12MO

I think the government should focus it’s energy on the causes of conflict and strategies for conflict resolution instead of using war and violence as the answer to our relationships with other countries.

 @9TVXPD6 from Michigan  answered…12mos12MO

We give NATO 4%, it should be 2% if at all. It is valid case to defund NATO. Why aren’t we covering our borders? So decrease our presence around the world.

 @9TVHCL7 from Michigan  answered…12mos12MO

If they start treating the soldiers with the respect the money poses. They can still serve our country and get their compensation when needed for problems the military causes itself. It's not just one and the other.

 @9TLYK5LIndependent from Michigan  answered…12mos12MO

i think it should be investigated for fraud and corruption. this would allow for the military budget to go down drastically without a loss of efficiency

 @9TKYBPK from Michigan  answered…12mos12MO

Most other county’s require males to serve in the military for 1-2 years. I believe we should adopt something similar.

 @9TDSWFY from Michigan  answered…1yr1Y

Defense spending is important but more focus needs to be placed on the digital front and educating citizens above propaganda.

  @Gherkin77 from Michigan  answered…1yr1Y

We should completely eradicate the Marine Corps as well as the "space force" as well as decrease funding universally, it's stupid how much money goes to these monsters

 @9T7PDPW from Michigan  answered…1yr1Y

It depends on the war effort being funded. Like Ukraine doesn't need our constant support in funding but other countries we're allied with do need some funding for basic needs.

 @9T54ZSW from Michigan  answered…1yr1Y

increase but not till we need to like right now would probably a good time. but we don't always need it, the us army is pretty big and strong I don't think it's the biggest but it is better than most

 @9T4JZKC from Michigan  answered…1yr1Y

Decrease unless there are major, direct threats to the United States and war is inevitable to directly keep the United States safe.

 @9SZZLKK from Michigan  answered…1yr1Y

if it was for our own needs within our country then increase, but we are sticking our noses in places they shouldn't and funding wars we have no part in, so we should decrease.

 @9SZZCJG from Michigan  answered…1yr1Y

They should increase it by a little because it seems like there getting what they need but they should have better things to help with war and training

 @9SY2RD8Democrat from Michigan  answered…1yr1Y

Neither really!! I feel middle since there are increasing or decreasing the amount of cash but on the other hand they should spend a little on the spending

 @9SMKHWJ from Michigan  answered…1yr1Y

I personally, don't think there should be any fighting in the first place. I think that no one should be spending anything because the wars should stop.

 @9S56NXG from Michigan  answered…1yr1Y

increase and pass a government fair spending bill to make sure we are getting fair prices with tax money.

 @9S52BN9 from Michigan  answered…1yr1Y

Why have an army these individuals didn't are sacrificing thier lives for a fight they didn't start all government officials need to be military

 @9RWCT4W from Michigan  answered…1yr1Y

Neither, the military should be held accountable for every dollar increasing pay and support for actual troops. Decreasing and eliminating unnecessary spending on vanity projects.

 @9RPWT98 from Michigan  answered…1yr1Y

Decrease but cutting black budget funds that have no accountability. Legitimate spending is fine and keeps the US at the top of the food chain.

 @9RD4CC5  from Michigan  answered…1yr1Y

Decrease military spending in equipment procurement. The military industrial complex is able to dictate outargues prices for components and equipment that are at or below private consumer standards and charge more.

 @9R52T4K from Michigan  answered…1yr1Y

This is another question that isn’t a yes or no answer. We need to do whatever we need to do to keep up.

 @9R26CJGProgressive from Michigan  answered…1yr1Y

Funding should be directed at areas of the military that will be needed in future conflicts, and more funding for our veterans.

 @9QY3F6MIndependent from Michigan  answered…1yr1Y

Neither. We should however, prevent price gouging committed by weapons manufacturers so we get more for our tax payer dollars.

 @9QWYVCR from Michigan  answered…1yr1Y

Neither, but better choices need to be made regarding military spending with more focus on enlisted and less than flag officer pay.

 @9QSDSYZ from Michigan  answered…1yr1Y

A full review should be done and resources allocated differently, cut costs where it's reasonable to do so, and increase spending relative to cut costs in other areas

 @9QMWRWZ  from Michigan  answered…1yr1Y

Keep within but make spending more focused on war fighting instead of social agendas and political stances

 @9Q2CFM8 from Michigan  answered…1yr1Y

Protection of our country and its people should be a priority. If we are be threatened, we need to be ready to defend ourselves.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...