Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

Informed Voters

These active users have achieved an understanding of common concepts and the history regarding the topic of Planned Parenthood Funding

Engaged Voters

These active users have achieved a basic understanding of terms and definitions related to the topic of Planned Parenthood Funding

22.6k Replies

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...11yrs11Y

Yes

 @9GKPYCKIndependent  from Colorado  agreed…3yrs3Y

Top Agreement

It is not anyone's choice but the woman's choice there are so many circumstances that require abortions or birth control such as rape unwanted pregnancy egg topic pregnancy or other life-threatening conditions that make it extremely dangerous for the mom or the baby.

 @9GKSVD9  from North Carolina  disagreed…3yrs3Y

If they didn't open their legs in the first place then it wouldn't of happened, but in the case of rape victims who had no control over what happened to them, then they would be allowed help.

 @9LR3JWQ  from South Carolina  disagreed…2yrs2Y

Yes

I disagree. No form of birth control or condoms are 100% effective. I think you are uneducated on this topic.

 @9PWQXRH from Iowa  commented…2yrs2Y

So, you would be ok with killing the child simply because contraception (which if abortificient would kill the child anyway) didn’t work? Two human lives are at stake when it comes to abortion. How many women have to die in “failed” abortions?

 @exrepublican from Michigan  agreed…3yrs3Y

Yes, their services reach far beyond abortions and can save many lives through cancer screening, prenatal services, and adoption referrals

I was actually raped by my own brother last year when I was 15. They did not allow me an abortion. They said “If I’m old enough to have a period I’m old enough to give birth”. Guess what? Child died. Birth defects from incest. So now the kid is dead and I’m traumatized. Oh, also? Ripped me. Yes, giving birth can rip a woman’s vagina. Yes mines was a worst case scenario but regardless of someone’s situation I don’t think men realize how much abortion actually hurts. When my mom was a kid and abortion was a right women had a deserved her dad raped…  Read more

 @9GKSZ29Constitution from Wyoming  disagreed…3yrs3Y

Many who get abortions don't have these issues and are just irresponsible with their sexual partners.

  @Ars-Gratia-Artiscommented…2yrs2Y

Yes, as long as funding is not used for abortion procedures

I would agree with that.

 @9GKSXFWRepublican from North Carolina  disagreed…3yrs3Y

In these events other than an unwanted pregnancy, then the mother should be able to get an abortion. Planned Parenthood should not be able to provide abortions to just anyone who wants an abortion, rather to those who are in medical need of one. In this event, an abortion should be paid for by insurance or Medicaid/Medicare, depending on which one the mother uses.

 @9P2VH7S from Arkansas  agreed…2yrs2Y

No, and the government should not give funds to any organizations that perform abortions

I agree, because if we continue funding these programs and make them more accessible, we're taking the importance out of safe sex because they could just terminate it if they get pregnant on accident. It should be reserved for situations like rape only.

 @9RGQQGD from Illinois  commented…2yrs2Y

Yes

Just to let you know, planned parenthood provides AND encourages people to be informed on many family planning options and provide resources for having a baby and what other choices can be made if being a parent is not an option. They go over how to take care of yourself to have a healthy pregnancy, resources for healthcare during the pregnancy, adoption agencies/services, or even options if you change your mind half way through and would like to raise the baby yourself. And in those situations where terminating the pregnancy isn’t a thought for a pregnant person, they also provide reso…  Read more

 @B3XFSK4Independent from California  commented…1yr1Y

It should be up to choice no matter what. CONTRACEPTIVE'S ARE NOT 100% EFFECTIVE!

 @9FLKWD2  from New York  agreed…3yrs3Y

Defunding planned parenthood will not stop abortion but instead make them less safe leading to higher mortality rates among young women.

 @9FM9M4Y from Connecticut  agreed…3yrs3Y

I agree; removing funding from a safe source of abortion will only lead to more unnecessary deaths, and will encourage people to break the law in order to keep themselves safe or have control over their own body.

 @9LR3JWQ from South Carolina  agreed…2yrs2Y

Yes

I agree!! I think it would also lead to more child neglect and foster kids. The foster system is already messed up all around, there are kids sleping in offices because there is no room for anymore foster kids.

 @9VQMC84 from California  commented…2yrs2Y

Adopted newborns do not go to the foster care system, this is a common misconception. There are 33 parents per newborn placed for adoption. Meanwhile, the goal of foster care is reunification, meaning that the majority are not eligible for adoption.

 @9VQMC84 from California  commented…2yrs2Y

And yet Roe v Wade getting overturned has not resulted in piles of women's corpses on the streets. This is a lie from the 20th century. Welcome to the modern era, where we now have penicillin, destigmatized single-parenthood, and better social services for families.

 @BBL3GFF  from Arkansas  agreed…3mos3MO

Engaged Planned Parenthood Funding

Government funding to Planned Parenthood goes towards helping women gain access to necessary healthcare that they may not otherwise be able to afford, such as ultrasounds, pap smears, pregnancy screenings, etc. Funding from the government is not used on abortion, except in the cases of rape, incest, or life-threatening situations. Therefore, defunding Planned Parenthood doesn't prevent abortions, but rather prevents low-income and middle class women from getting medical care that they may not be able to afford otherwise.

 @BBMLJY7 from South Carolina  disagreed…3mos3MO

If you need healthcare, work for it, you should only be given free or assisted healthcare if you are elderly or disabled.

 @BBMRFZSfrom Montana  agreed…3mos3MO

I agree with funding planned parenthood but I do not agree with the government using the money for abortions in case of rape or incest. That child is still going to become a human being and doing two wrongs do not make a right.

 @B9YTNPR  from California  agreed…4mos4MO

Any of us, child, teenager, adult, or elder, deserves support when a mistake has been made. Yes, accountability is important, but in this situation, the price of accountability is too heavy. Supporting minors when they make bad decisions also doesn't hurt anyone. Yes, if someone was driving and made a bad decision that hurt someone, they should face the consequences, because they negatively affected another person. However, when a teenager gets an abortion, who does that really affect except herself?

 @B9YZHBC from Arkansas  disagreed…4mos4MO

Bad decisions come with consequences no matter what. An abortion does not only affect her, but it also affects the child that is living inside of her. At the moment of conception is when life is created, so abortion is the murder of a child.

 @B9YYW8D from California  commented…4mos4MO

I agree; also, Planned Parenthood doesn't just provide pregnancy services, they also provide women's healthcare services.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...11yrs11Y

No

 @9FLKWD2  from New York  disagreed…3yrs3Y

Planned parenthood offers more than just abortions and lifesaving to those who don't have insurance. planned parenthood offers all kinds of health checkups! Even if a woman went to go get an abortion that is her choice!

 @9FM5MRD  from Ohio  disagreed…3yrs3Y

Planned Parenthood may offer some beneficial health services but they need to choose whether or not they want to go all in on abortion. They want abortion up to birth and that no matter how you spin it is none better than medically assisted murder. It may be a woman’s choice to get an abortion but first it was her choice to get pregnant with the exception of rape. We need to train responsibility and no life should suffer because of your bad mistakes, especially a baby.

 @9RGQQGD from Illinois  commented…2yrs2Y

Yes

Abortion up to birth… do you think people just decide after 9 or so months of being pregnant, that they just change their mind about it? That baby is getting delivered no matter what, if it’s “an abortion” it still has to be pushed out/birthed. Planned Parenthood is not pushing a narrative that, “we support your abortion choices, even if you’re crowning!” That is not a thing. At that point, if the child is not wanted by the birth parents, it’s an adoption case WHICH planned parenthood gives resources for when you step foot inside and are contem…  Read more

 @9VQMC84 from California  commented…2yrs2Y

Do you think the media is lying when a newborn is found in a dumpster or Walmart bathroom? If women are capable of killing their neonates, what makes you think post-viability fetal death is impossible? In Arizona (one of the few states that keeps abortion statistics), 80% of later abortions are elective. This means they are not for medical emergencies or extreme fetal disability.

 Deleteddisagreed…3yrs3Y

Less than 3% of abortions are used for the mother's physical well-being and the well-being of the child. It should be abolished, but at the very least be funded by donations and not by the government/taxpayer's dollars.

 @9FM6J6S from Georgia  agreed…3yrs3Y

It's important to recognize that Planned Parenthood provides comprehensive healthcare services beyond abortions, and for many individuals, it is their primary source of healthcare. People seek a variety of services there, and each person's healthcare choices and needs should be respected.

 @4B9RBKYRepublicancommented…8mos8MO

#4 Expert Planned Parenthood Funding

If PP was able to get by just offering "basic services" they would have stayed open in states with abortion bans after Roe was overturned. The whole "they do more and abortions are only 3%" is largely a myth and has even been debunked by Washington Post. Abortion is their bread and butter and if it was such a small part of what they do, they would not have closed so many clinics in red states.

 @9FM84VD from Colorado  agreed…3yrs3Y

I agree with this comment, it allows for all types of advantages to not only young and old parents, but people who should not even be parents (under prepared teenagers). It builds an overall buffer in the risk of pregnancy.

 @9VQMC84 from California  commented…2yrs2Y

Informed Abortion

Adolescent parents need support, not stigma. When I was a teenager, too many people tried to pressure me to abort. Even after my child's birth, people asked why I didn't have an abortion, as if it were expected of all young parents. Young parents need access to childcare, nutritious services, and housing to continue their education and to be able to support their children in the long run. Abortion solves none of this.

 @9GFTD6T  from Connecticut  disagreed…3yrs3Y

Women should have the right to their bodies and shouldn't be forced to bare children they don't wish to have especially because it can cause child abuse or even suicide. Motherhood is a very difficult thing and should be a choice rather than a forced role.

 @9GFVKNKReform from Virginia  agreed…3yrs3Y

Yes, but it's not only because of possible child abuse or even suicide. The argument about abortion boils down to basic human anatomy which should always be granted regardless of possible consequences. Moreover, Planned Parenthood doesn't only provide abortion services, and thus, one has to consider the significance of furthering access to sex education, STD testing, and birth control.

 @9GFY97J from Virginia  agreed…3yrs3Y

yes i do agree with this because motherhood should be a gift not a curse that a person has deal with the rest of their lives.

 @9Y7KHP2Constitution from Ohio  commented…2yrs2Y

Engaged Planned Parenthood Funding

The mother is not forced to deal with this "curse" for the rest of her life. There are options for the mother if she does not want to keep the child. This includes adoption and other things that are very legal and in fact wanted for many families who cannot have children of their own.

 @9GFXMCW from Virginia  agreed…3yrs3Y

Yes as many of these mothers to be are due to the result of rape which they did not consent with so they should be given a choice to keep the baby or not

 @9GFV63S from Virginia  agreed…3yrs3Y

i agree with this because at the end of the day its no ones buisness what someone wants to do with their bodies. if someone isnt ready for a kid you cant force them even if they made a mistake.

 @9F8SXMS  from Minnesota  disagreed…3yrs3Y

Top Disagreement

Planned parenthood provides much more than abortions. They can offer tests, screenings, checkups, std tests etc.

  @jwolfsg1590Republican  from California  disagreed…3yrs3Y

If that's the case, then why did most of Planned Parenthood shut down when Roe v. Wade was overturned?

 @C4mpaignDunbirdGreen from Delaware  disagreed…3yrs3Y

It's a common misconception that most of Planned Parenthood shut down after Roe v. Wade was overturned. In reality, Planned Parenthood continues to operate, providing a wide range of healthcare services. For example, they conduct over 650,000 cancer screenings and prevention programs annually. The organization is a vital resource for many, especially in areas where affordable healthcare is scarce.

If we focus on the impact of defunding, consider this: in Texas, a study found that after the state cut funding to Planned Parenthood, there was a significant increase in childbirth among low-in…  Read more

  @jwolfsg1590Republican  from California  disagreed…3yrs3Y

If that's the case, then why did most of Planned Parenthood shut down when Roe v. Wade was overturned? It seems that their money maker was abortion.

  @VulcanMan6  from Kansas  disagreed…3yrs3Y

That still doesn't deny the fact that they do offer more than than just abortions, so I'm not sure what you think this argument is...

 @9FG45HB from Kansas  agreed…3yrs3Y

yes i agree planned parenthood is very needed to a lot of women who may be expecting or want birth control it isnt just about abortions it is focues on the health of women too in many ways

 @9FDPJ2Q  from Illinois  disagreed…3yrs3Y

Planned Parenthood has recently been spending record high amounts of money on their abortion programs. This has increased the sale of abortions and therefore killing more unborn. Yes, they offer many other good programs

 @LobbySamanthaRepublican from Indiana  disagreed…3yrs3Y

I understand the weight of your concerns, truly I do. It's important to remember though that only about 3% of all Planned Parenthood health services are abortion services. The vast majority of their funds go towards preventive measures like contraceptives and cancer screenings. Just imagine all the lives that could be saved with early detection of cancers. Isn't prevention of unwanted pregnancies a step towards reducing the number of abortions? What are your thoughts on focusing more on preventive measures?

 @9GYS2B9Socialist  from Illinois  disagreed…3yrs3Y

Planned parenthood is more than just abortion, it provides many resources to people who don’t have them.

 @9GYSSL2 from Arizona  agreed…3yrs3Y

Planned parenthood funding is a smart idea because then we'll have smart, more prepared teenagers entering the adult life. Which means they'll most likely have a kid. Responsibility, financially, is something teenagers aren't as aware of as they used to be. Bringing these planned parenthood classes back to school, with the new technology of our world, can bring better hope for the future. As well as just overall, being smart with money. More money can be spent on important things rather than just reckless spending.

 @9GYSCPV from Idaho  agreed…3yrs3Y

Planned parenthood is more than just abortion, it provides many resources to people who don’t have them.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...11yrs11Y

Yes, their services reach far beyond abortions and can save many lives through cancer screening, prenatal services, and adoption referrals

  @Yaunti2  from New York  agreed…3yrs3Y

Top Agreement

Planned Parenthood serves 2.4 million people yearly. It's not just about abortions, but overall health. It's a critical part of our collective healthcare consciousness. Lives depend on these services and to deny them is to deny life.

 @9FPJ389 from Ohio  disagreed…3yrs3Y

Planned Parenthood is taking more lives than it is saving. They are already denying life by denying babies the right to be alive, the right to be born and live. A small percentage of modern abortions are for health reasons, and the majority is women just not wanting the baby. It is also detrimental to mental health after you get an abortion, and many women tell stories of intense regret after the fact.

 @9FPCTTB from Florida  disagreed…3yrs3Y

Absolutely not. Planned Parenthood is enriched by the business of abortion and has advertised it as the best option and fought hard against people who call them out on their nonsense and infanticide. The government should not promote infanticide even if they have services that "help" there's more businesses than just Planned Parenthood.

 @9FPF3VNRepublican from Arizona  disagreed…3yrs3Y

Planned Parenthood doesn't provide options as marketed. They don't provide emergency baby supplies, and they don't provide other essential services. Their only real choice is abortion.

 @9F8SXMS  from Minnesota  agreed…3yrs3Y

If planned parenthood is not funded, the unwanted babies will not have proper parenting and put into adoptions/ foster care where most kids don't find a home

 @9FGD4TD from Colorado  disagreed…3yrs3Y

God has intended for every life to be here on this earth. Whether they are White, black, Asian, Mexican,or handy capped. to kill that life before they even had the chance to speak is to be murder.

 @9FBKBWC from Minnesota  disagreed…3yrs3Y

If a four-year-old was put into foster care or had a poor quality of life, the killing of the child would obviously not be justified for such reasons. Why would such a thing be for a child that is younger and just in the womb?

 @CharismaticDiplomacy from Pennsylvania  disagreed…3yrs3Y

It's crucial to differentiate between the unique circumstances of a four-year-old child and a fetus in the womb. The comparison, while emotive, doesn't take into account the complexities involved in the issue of abortion. For instance, consider a woman facing severe health risks due to her pregnancy. If the government doesn't fund Planned Parenthood, she might not have access to a safe, legal abortion, putting her life at risk. Shouldn't the woman's existing life and health be taken into account? What are your thoughts on this?

 @9J8T6NJWomen’s Equality from Texas  disagreed…2yrs2Y

Yes

Comparing a clump of under developed cells to a fully developed human being who has been born, and has been OUTSIDE OF THE WOMB for years is completely ridiculous. There is no comparison. A 6 week old fetus is not a “younger child”. A 6 week old fetus is a clump of cells. There should be restrictions in regards to abortions. Restrictions including the length of time the woman has been pregnant, her age, her health condition etc etc.

 @9FD8QWQdisagreed…3yrs3Y

The life of the child is still valuable, why strip them away from that right just because it is possible they don't find a home. They still have a right to life.

 @9FBTN9Gdisagreed…3yrs3Y

that the parents should be able to take care of the baby since they made it and if they didn't want the baby, they should have protected themselves from it happing.

 @B7NPQND  from Tennessee  agreed…8mos8MO

Planned Parenthood offers a wide array of healthcare outside of just abortion related care or procedures. In fact, not every Planned Parenthood even offers abortion related care. While I am pro-choice, it is important to note that they provide sexual and reproductive health wellness care far outside the range of just abortions. They offer STI testing and treatments, cancer screenings, prenatal care, fertility counseling, birth control, etcetera. For those who are anti-choice, let's please remember that the only true way to lower the number of abortions happening per year is to prevent unwanted pregnancies from even happening. That means funding places like Planned Parenthood, which provide resources and education about preventative methods.

 @B7NTZDC from New Jersey  disagreed…8mos8MO

Planned Parenthood, abortion, plan B's, birth control, etc are murder. Planned Parenthood is not something that should be funded, not only can it cause death for women getting the abortion, it also damages them mentally and physically. The second the baby is produced it's already life being formed inside, the connection with the baby and you are already there. Many of those health wellness care can be done in a doctors office with a parent outside or inside the room, planned Parenthood isn't known for the wellness care it's known for it's abortions and that's…  Read more

 @B7NRZDB from Virginia  disagreed…8mos8MO

Planned parenthood is dominantly known for abortions. Abortions should not be used at birth co troll and goes against many religions. When it comes to STI or STD treatment, there are ways to avoid it. Don't engage in the act of sex.

 @B8W72T4No Labels  from Missouri  agreed…6mos6MO

abartions shouldnt be banned but regulated, having abortions are critical for safety of the women. The fetus isn't really a human being until it takes its first breath. It's like having a Teratoma (teratoma is a tumor that can grow teeth, hair, and even eyes). Therefore, I don't think abortions should be illegal but regulated for safety.

 @B8WQVRB  from Kansas  disagreed…6mos6MO

Planned Parenthood should be defunded. With the amount of abortions they do a year. It is dangerous to the population of America, planned Parenthood only supplies abortions. When they should be able to provide women food, diapers, baby formula. And other that they do not do. We should not have a system that only supports ending of innocent lives

 @B8WSBLS  from California  disagreed…6mos6MO

The fetuses heart rate is able to be detected between 6-7 weeks, therefore the fetus is alive earlier than you say. The ONLY reason to kill a human life in the circumstance should be if it was conceived by rape, even then, there should be a process to make sure this isn't a rash decision, and that they understand that this choice may ruin their chance to have children for the rest of their life. This decision needs to be made before the heartbeat of the baby can be detected.

 @B8P5848Libertarian  from California  disagreed…6mos6MO

A teratoma isn’t a seperate human being though it’s a part of a currently existing human. Abortions deliberately end a human (scientifically a human is any stage of the egg after fertilization since it fits the criteria of life and is composed of human dna) life. Funding abortion via Planned Parenthood is funding a systemic killing (note: abortion ≠ murder unless it is done out of malice) of humans. The question also isn’t about abortion legality it’s about funding of an abortion company.

 @B8WT2L5 from Utah  disagreed…6mos6MO

They should be illegal cause if we consider small organisms and cells out in space life this is life as well. The fetus can still feel things like if you kill it. We shouldn't kill fetuses cause they are "clumps of cells" we are all clumps of cells.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...11yrs11Y

No, and the government should not give funds to any organizations that perform abortions

  @Yaunti2  from New York  disagreed…3yrs3Y

Top Disagreement

Planned Parenthood provides crucial health services beyond abortions. Denying funds hampers access to vital health services.

 @9FPBX8Z from New York  agreed…3yrs3Y

Yes I agree with this comment about planned parent hood funding because planned parenthood provides more services than just abortions.

 @9FPC56TDemocrat from Ohio  agreed…3yrs3Y

I agree, that basic health care should definitely involve planned parenthood services, which should include abortions, but overall the increase in planned parenthood would reduce abortions as a need.

 @9GGK63HIndependent  from Nebraska  disagreed…3yrs3Y

Planned Parenthood does much more than just abortions, they provide adoption services, hormone therapy, birth control, STD screenings, and cancer screenings. If there is less funding for Planned Parenthood, fewer people will be able to access affordable birth control. If there is less access to birth control, that means there will be more unwanted pregnancies. If we cut funding to crucial organizations such as Planned Parenthood, we will increase the number of kids who go into foster care, who are born into families in poverty, who are put up for adoption, or who are born to young parents.…  Read more

 @MellowNominationRepublicanfrom Illinois  commented…3yrs3Y

The issue of funding organizations that provide abortion services raises a question of conscience for many taxpayers who believe in the sanctity of life. Is it fair to make them financially support a procedure they fundamentally disagree with?

 @9GGKPBFRepublican from Kansas  disagreed…3yrs3Y

abortions should be a crime of first-degree murder there are multiple ways to "get rid" of a child other than killing them.

 @9GM4CY7  from California  disagreed…3yrs3Y

The access to planned parenthood is vital for individuals to receive proper health care services and those seeking abortions. Many women don't have access to obtain safe abortions due to certain situations or financial barriers and planned parenthood combats those issues by offering abortion services.

 @9XZNFCF from Ohio  disagreed…2yrs2Y

"many" is vague and not at all backed up by the facts. Abortion is shamefully used as post facto birth control.

 @9GM4N7S from Missouri  agreed…3yrs3Y

Agreed. If a person or family cannot safely take care of a child/infant they should be able to choose for themselves what is best. We need to care more about the lives that are being endangered when we take away a woman's right. It makes no sense to bring a life into the world that is not wanted, there are already many youth who feel out of place and not safe so it is only logical to stop that from happening. There are certain things the government should control for the greater good of the people but that choice is not one for the government to make.

 @9GN6F35  from Connecticut  disagreed…3yrs3Y

The statement is blatantly wrong. Abortions are NOT only used because an individual does not want a child. They are often a medically necessary procedure. To kill a grown adult in the hopes of saving what is basically a slightly developed egg is ridiculous. Abortion is a basic human right. To take away abortion is at the same level of taking peoples ability to get a flu shot away. Its basic human rights. By taking it away will greatly increase the amount of dangerous, self-performed procedures. This is one step further towards the complete devolution of the U.S. to a tyrannical dictatorship.…  Read more

 @9GN7FJ3Republican  from Florida  disagreed…3yrs3Y

Statistically speaking, the vast majority of abortions are not cases of medical necessity. All humans, including those not yet born, have the same rights. In the Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson wrote, "We hold these truths to be self-evident that all men are created equal." This is the clear founding doctrine of our nation. Scientifically speaking, almost all scientists recognize that life begins at conception, making it a person with rights, not a slightly developed egg. The right of a child to live is a human right, a woman being able to eliminate a human life for…  Read more

 @9GN789Q from New York  agreed…3yrs3Y

I agree with this statement entirely. Abortions should absolutely be legal and are a basic human right. When there is an adult life in danger, it is never right to save an unborn fetus that doesn't even know of its own existence. The bible is a terrible way to make beliefs about the real world. The bible is an old book. That is the reason we have a secular government, and our laws should be absolutely forbidden from following anything from that book.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...10yrs10Y

Yes, as long as funding is not used for abortion procedures

 @9G7RR4X  from South Carolina  agreed…3yrs3Y

Top Agreement

As a women I am pro-life. My grandmother had many miscarriages and my aunt went through years of infertility and as a woman in a family full of women that genetically are passed down PCOS, conceiving children can be a challenge and every child is a miracle and blessing. So while I want to encourage adoption and keeping children in this world, I will never judge a woman for something she chooses to do to her own body. We can as a consensus can create a way to make everyone happy and take the control out of this issue as long as we work together.

 @9G7ZD4B from South Carolina  disagreed…3yrs3Y

If you believe a woman should be able to get an abortion to are pro choice even if you wouldn't get one for yourself you still support to murder of children in the form of abortion.

 @JumpyBudgetBillGreen from Arkansas  agreed…3yrs3Y

Your personal experience adds such a unique perspective to this conversation. The struggles your family faced with fertility really highlight the complexity of this issue. It's so important to remember that every situation is different, and what might be right for one person might not be for another. I wholeheartedly agree that coming together to find a solution that respects everyone's beliefs and needs is the key.

 @L3ftyMantis from Alaska  disagreed…3yrs3Y

Absolutely, every life situation indeed carries its own unique intricacies. However, I believe we must remember the sanctity and inherent dignity of all human life, from conception to natural death. This principle, while respecting individual beliefs, also calls us to uphold a universal moral standard. For instance, consider the scenario of a woman in a low-income area without access to quality healthcare. Instead of funding organizations that enable abortions, government resources could be better used to provide comprehensive prenatal and postnatal care, promoting both the well-being of the mother and the child.

 @9G7YRND from Georgia  disagreed…3yrs3Y

I agree with your statement, any human life regardless of being born or not should still be protected by the law and constitution.

 @9G7XDGP from Texas  disagreed…3yrs3Y

I agree. The government needs to stop funding planned parenthood. they do not help women the draw them in and make them think that they are gonna help and be there through it all but really they steal your money and kill your child and leave you to figure it out on your own. their main focus is abortion and anyone that tells me that is wrong hasn't looked up anything and knows nothing that has been happening with planned parenthood or what they do.

 @B89P4SR  from Michigan  agreed…7mos7MO

Planned Parenthood offers so many other options, but abortions should still be available when medically necessary.

 @B8DN97B from Iowa  disagreed…7mos7MO

Medically necessary abortions, like a stillbirth, should be available. But non-necessary abortions should not be legal.

 @B8DM4DF from New York  disagreed…7mos7MO

If mother is endangered abortion is a must, a human life is more valuable than a potential life, but if not, why should I fund money for your reckless behavior

 @B8CNQXL from Connecticut  disagreed…7mos7MO

I agree if the pregnancy is going to cause harm to the mother or the baby has a low life expectancy due to defect or developmental issue abortion should be allowed.

 @9GXYDXHRepublican from Missouri  agreed…3yrs3Y

Planned Parenthood should be funded for children/people have the ability to learn about things like sex. But they should learn that if you do have sex and it was a mistake that they should live with that mistake and not take the life of a baby that is not born yet. That is unfair for the baby because everything should be able to live life, and you are committing murder by killing a baby before it was born.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...