Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

55.5k Replies

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...7yrs7Y

Yes

 @B7X6MTMIndependent  from Florida  agreed…8mos8MO

College isn't necessary but should be accesible to all, giving everyone an equal opportunity to do more and be well educated, the only issue would be job opportunities would be harder to guarantee, but this could be avoided if these students end up making their own businesses in the process.

 @B7YGD4K from Missouri  disagreed…8mos8MO

Having college be free for all would lose the value for degrees and the job market would be competitive and hard to get a job. Also, less funding would be provided for most college resulting in less resources because most universities rely on tuition.

 @B7YTLXY from Indiana  disagreed…8mos8MO

College is a choice, and gives you a better education, therefore giving you more opportunities. I do think the cost of college should be lowered though.

 @B7WP6RT  from Washington  disagreed…8mos8MO

Although free college sounds like a luxury, only a few people deserve to be educated and it all depends on their mindset. Some individuals aren't as motivated and dedicated to actually learning, the only thing they want is a job that makes money. If people don't have the ture dream to learn and adapt to their profession, the world would be dealing with many careless "professionals" in their day to day life.

 @B7YCX6Y  from Nebraska  disagreed…8mos8MO

If collage is free for all then collages would severely decline and the education you are receiving from it will not be nearly as valuable. This would also increase tax payer dollars significantly and cause the general public to have less spending money hurting the economy. You could argue that this extera education would race the economy as people would be better educated and be able to do more by starting bussnises etc.. but I believe the cons out way the pros. Along with this collage drop out rates would increase. I believe that we need to keep our collage grants and assistance but if we…  Read more

 @B8BZ38R  from Kentucky  agreed…7mos7MO

The amount of opportunities for people would be highly increased, many low-income students are stuck with loan debt throughout their entire life, low-income students will never be able to pay for their tuition, despite some being highly intelligent with much potential, and scholarship opportunities just don't cut it. I whole-heartily believe that students, especially low-income, should have their college tuition paid for, in full, by the government.

 @B86DPQW  from Michigan  agreed…7mos7MO

Most highschool students when they leave highschool are unable to pay for college or get a job without income so therefore we should agree to help out those kinds of students.

 @B86PL4X from Pennsylvania  disagreed…7mos7MO

We simply can’t afford it. Paying the college tuitions for everyone in the country would cost way too much and we’re already spending too much as a country

 @B87NK44Republican from Illinois  disagreed…7mos7MO

Not everyone needs to go to college, and a portion of students who attend college end up barely using the degree that they paid for. It doesn't make sense why taxpayers end up paying for something that doesn't benefit them.

 @B89SRKJ from Illinois  disagreed…7mos7MO

College should not be free. Nothing in this world is free. But it should be affordable. Getting a degree shouldn't put you in debt for the rest of your life.

 @B88VXZZIndependentfrom PR  disagreed…7mos7MO

They have several other options available to them. They could go into a trade, community college, or the military

 @B8LVK6N  from Michigan  agreed…7mos7MO

Higher education should be achievable by people of all backgrounds. Student loans can be live ruining for people who are lower or middle class which discourages more than half of the population to get a degree or certification that allows for them to work in crucial roles. We ask "where are all the doctors? nurses?" while making it financially impossible for 50%+ of the population to work as one.

 @B8MKZFW from Pennsylvania  disagreed…7mos7MO

It is a persons’ choice to attend college and they can work for scholarships to make it more affordable.

 @B8MHQ7R from Texas  disagreed…7mos7MO

Individual's should not have to fun other people's children's college degrees. All the money would just come from tax payer dollars, and the quality of education would go down due to less funding.

 @B8NCCVY from Wisconsin  commented…7mos7MO

Fix your spelling and how would funding go down? The quality would tank because of lack of innovative incentives like a limited budget to work with

 @B8MDFWB from Florida  disagreed…7mos7MO

student debt has become so enormous, that it would require overwhelming funds from government that they cannot afford to provide. they should help alleviate the issue with policies that can help reduce student debt, not solve it all with their own money

 @B8N2FST from Illinois  disagreed…7mos7MO

College is NOT required. College should provide only targeted training for a given field. Remove excess requirements, remove degree programs that do not contribute, remove federal backing of most college loans.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...7yrs7Y

No

 @B9J3ZPX  from Arizona  disagreed…5mos5MO

Top Disagreement

When discussing cases of free education, multiple factors must be addressed, such as value of education in the modern day, the requirement of higher education in the modern workfield, and whether funding would be from the Government, or taxing the people.

The value of education in the modern day is that if you are informed of

 @B9JL6LN from Illinois  agreed…5mos5MO

I agree with this comment because it correctly points out that free college isn’t a simple yes-or-no issue and must consider the modern value of education, workforce demands, and realistic funding sources, which helps make the discussion more balanced and thoughtful.

 @B9J8LK3 from Texas  agreed…5mos5MO

Education should be more affordable to all individuals and citizens of the United States. It should not be 100% free, but more affordable. Stdents suffer too much from student loans and debts and it's an issue that should be addressed.

 @B9J93Q6Democrat from California  agreed…5mos5MO

I agree with this comment. Free college is a complex issue that involves multiple factors, including the societal value of education, accessibility, and the funding source. Education today is increasingly necessary for many careers, so making it accessible could improve economic opportunity and reduce inequality. However, funding through the government or taxes must be carefully considered to ensure fairness and sustainability. Overall, I think it’s important to balance the benefits of free education with practical financial planning and societal impact.

 @B9JGQNM  from California  agreed…5mos5MO

I agree with this comment because free college for all is more complicated than it sounds. Higher education is valuable today, but not every job requires a four-year college degree. Many careers can be reached through trade schools or other training programs, which should also be supported. Another important issue is funding. If the federal government pays for college tuition, the money has to come from taxes paid by the people. This could place a burden on taxpayers, including those who do not attend college. Because of this, it makes sense to carefully consider the value of a college degree, who truly needs it, and how the costs would be shared before making college free for everyone.

 @9FFPFR7 from New York  disagreed…3yrs3Y

Free college for all is good because our society can have less stress on getting education and our country can be more advanced if more people are able to get education.

 @9FFRCGMLibertarian from Arizona  disagreed…3yrs3Y

If the government decides to pay for college, colleges will raise their prices by however much the government is providing.

 @B9J2WJH from California  disagreed…5mos5MO

There is no reason for the federal government to not fund tuition at four-year colleges and universities. Many students end up in severe debt which can cripple their financial ability for years to come and can lead to heightened poverty rates throughout the country. Education should not be locked behind a mountain of money when it's what can get you earning that much money in the first place.

 @9FRRB5G from Colorado  disagreed…3yrs3Y

Currently, due to the price of college, many can not afford it and therefore choose to not take that route when we need people to do certain jobs requiring a college education.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...7yrs7Y

No, but provide more scholarship opportunities for low-income students

 @B89RDV7  from Illinois  disagreed…7mos7MO

Top Disagreement

I think all students should have a chance to have scholarship opportunities. It's great that low-income students can get free college, but these opportunities should be for everyone.

 @B8B78TY from Washington  agreed…7mos7MO

I believe college should be free for all. I think it is a right of the people to have access to knowledge and be given the chance to learn how to better our future. If we can't better our future, where will we be?

 @B8D62HBDemocrat from Indiana  agreed…7mos7MO

Yes. Absolutely. Higher education should be eligible for everyone. The price of going to college is ridiculous, so giving everyone an opportunity for a scholarship is a great start.

 @B8DBWYYNo Labels from California  commented…7mos7MO

No, if they have the money to pay for college they should pay because people with low-income have no chance of paying it all.

 @B8CFLWN from Ohio  agreed…7mos7MO

I think all students should have a chance to have scholarship opportunities. It's great that low-income students can get free college, but these opportunities should be for everyone.

 @B8B7GHN from Georgia  agreed…7mos7MO

Yes, all students should have a chance to have scholarship opportunities because increase educational access and affordability, reduce student debt, and can improve graduation rates.

 @B7WMF6ZWomen’s Equality  from Texas  disagreed…8mos8MO

I believe that lower-income students should get the opportunity to get scholarships from the government because those students aren't set up for success.

 @B7WYCJMDemocrat from New York  agreed…8mos8MO

I believe low-income students should be able to get scholarships to help fund their education, but not having enough money does not mean they aren’t set up for success.

 @B7WVM3C from California  agreed…8mos8MO

I believe that by making college free for all that will have many people go to college and get a higher education. This will help many especially those in a lower income bracket.

 @B7YFW3Z from Tennessee  commented…8mos8MO

There will be a saturation of education, making it so every degree means less and less.

 @B7YGNMJDemocrat from Minnesota  agreed…8mos8MO

I believe that lower income students should get the opportunity to get scholarships from the government because some people want education but can't afford it.

 @B7WVMKJ from California  agreed…8mos8MO

I believe the government should help lower-income students apply for college because they could be struggling to attend college.

 @B8LH7GDRepublican  from Oklahoma  disagreed…7mos7MO

You want people to become smarter so that there are more workers but will not allow them to go to college for free even when they can not afford it. This causes more unemployment and less job opportunities for these people.

 @B8LM9RV from California  agreed…7mos7MO

I agree college should be free or way more affordable for the common US citizen. The modern job market requires a degree, internships, experience, and recommendations for a decent job. Without a degree many Americans suffer and live paycheck to paycheck.

 @B8M8YJL from Texas  agreed…7mos7MO

Making college free is a very difficult thing to achieve, though I do agree that college should be more affordable and accessible to a lot of people. They should find a way to make college more affordable to everyone.

 @B8LN2MN from Alabama  agreed…7mos7MO

I agree with the main point of this comment. Education is a key way to create opportunity and reduce inequality.However, free college for all comes with a cost, I think offering more scholarship opportunities for those in need is better.

 @B8LPJ3Xfrom Guam  agreed…7mos7MO

I do agree with this because this is a real-life issue. I feel we have many geniuses, but since they aren't given the chance to be born into a wealthy family, they won't be given the same opportunities as someone who is born into a wealthy family, and all of that talent will just end up going to waste.

 @B8FNYGR  from Georgia  disagreed…7mos7MO

Student debt is a huge problem regardless of your class rank. All students, regardless of income should be given free income if their household makes under $200K a year

 @B8HVQJHIndependent from Florida  agreed…7mos7MO

As a citizen of the United States, I believe students should not be overwhelmed with student loan debt. Education should be free for all citizens. After graduating, students could repay society by dedicating a certain amount of time to public service within a set period, such as working four to eight unpaid hours per week until the required hours are completed. If they are unable to fulfill this obligation, then they should repay the program financially.

 @B8GFCNCagreed…7mos7MO

I agree because a lot of people have good intentions and are very smart, but they may not have that kind of funding to pay for tuition

 @B8G6362 from California  agreed…7mos7MO

I agree with this because with a low income family should have financial aid and scholarship to continue studying.

 @B8G7Q55 from Ohio  agreed…7mos7MO

Money should never be something that stops a kid from getting their dream education thats why free college for all will help.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...7yrs7Y

No, but provide lower interest rates for student loans

 @9FT8J9V from California  disagreed…3yrs3Y

while lower interest rates do help, in the end it would overall be more beneficial for the government to pay for all of college because many students still cant afford college even with lower interest rates.

 @9FM5XPB from Hawaii  disagreed…3yrs3Y

Students don't want student loans or college debts because then they would have to pay it off later and that could rack up to a lot of money and they probably wouldn't be able to pay it off. They would have to worry about that on top of whatever else they have to do. Having Free College would put less stress on the person and they wouldn't have to worry about debt or paying back student loans.

 @B25T8HT from Hawaii  agreed…1yr1Y

Students don't want student loans or college debts because then they would have to pay it off later and that could rack up to a lot of money and they probably wouldn't be able to pay it off.

I agree because student loans can be a huge financial burden that takes years to pay off. Free college would reduce stress and let students focus on their education and future careers without worrying about debt. It would make higher education more accessible for everyone

 @9FSJK37 from Maryland  disagreed…3yrs3Y

By the time kids get out of college they are not gonna want to pay off all of the loans and debts that they have carried from college

 @9FGR8FGWomen’s Equality from Florida  disagreed…3yrs3Y

The Federal government isn't responsible for providing individuals with a college level education. However, the government should strive to help improve the number of citizens who are able to obtain a college education by helping lower student loans rate. School should be an investment that you can realistically pay off. Such as how we paid for failed businesses during COVID and how we paid to help bail out big banks. Why not give the money back to people who could also use the help.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...7yrs7Y

Yes, but only for partial tuition

 @9GLFMSY  from Illinois  agreed…3yrs3Y

Top Agreement

Many students do not come from a wealthy or even stable family. These students also have limited resources and are not able to find scholarships. Students who have experienced more hardships than average kids should most definitely have free college opportunities. Other students should also have the opportunities for a more affordable college.

 @9GLHW9RRepublican from Missouri  disagreed…3yrs3Y

there are many options to have free collage through the work of the student. there are many scholar ships giving chances to people of this nature. if a student is willing to work hard enough to go to collage they can do it for free already.

 @9GLHVCYRepublican from Missouri  disagreed…3yrs3Y

Students who come from a poorer family have financial aid, scholarships are available for students the ACT is given to students for free. You have to work for what you get. It is the students job to pay for college no matter where you come from.

 @9GLMJGJ from Florida  disagreed…3yrs3Y

I agree that many students do not come from a wealthy or even stable family. Students should have the opportunities for a more affordable college.

 @9GLJ8BF from Illinois  disagreed…3yrs3Y

Everyone has the right to an education and it should be affordably available to all in order to jump start a career.

 @B9RRWK2  from Oregon  agreed…5mos5MO

With the rise of colleges. I believe that there should be more funding in pursing future chairman and business people. Since there is so much money in the united States, if a small portion went to help reduce the costs of colleges who knows what opportunities awaits for those driven from harsh backgrounds.

 @B9VC4J4 from Nebraska  disagreed…4mos4MO

I think it could help but only under a supervised small amount, there is a lot of financial aid and scholarship opportunities, I think instead forming a system where they raise awareness for certain forms of aid and grants.

 @9FT8J9V from California  agreed…3yrs3Y

partial tuition allows for many people to receive help paying for college without taking to much funds out of the government that is either payed by taxes or used on other important events.

 @B87K98N from Minnesota  agreed…7mos7MO

I think the government should crack down on overinflated tuition rates and provide hefty scholarships in the meantime. The real problem is greedy institutions.

 @8LXMDF5 from Ohio  answered…6yrs6Y

 @94Z37B4 from North Carolina  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8G5FNF4Libertarian from Tennessee  answered…6yrs6Y

No, but they should offer more scholarships and grants for all students of all types of income.

 @9D5CTP5 from Washington  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but this should only apply to State colleges and Universities. Any aid for private will be based on the Public cost.

 @GraciousSwingStateLibertarianfrom Wisconsin  disagreed…3yrs3Y

Private colleges often offer unique programs and smaller class sizes, which may be more suitable for some students. If federal aid is solely based on public cost, it might deter students from attending private institutions due to financial constraints, even if that institution is the best fit for their educational needs.

 @9DVX7BM from California  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes but only for students entering college with a high likelihood of graduating. Admission process should be competitive.

 @WittyRedWhiteBlue from New York  agreed…3yrs3Y

I agree with your point. For instance, a model similar to the one employed in many Scandinavian countries could be effective. They offer free higher education, but the admission process is highly competitive, ensuring only the most dedicated and capable students can attend. This model maintains a high standard of education and ensures that government resources are effectively utilized. However, this would require a significant shift in our current education system. Do you think such a drastic change could be implemented successfully in the US?

 @9DRRZJZ from Alaska  commented…3yrs3Y

Well I sure hate to burst your bubble, but human nature being what it is, government WILL have a vested interest in what is taught at universities and schools that it funds, and it will seek to indoctrinate and not to educate the citizens. Government does not collect taxes to provide services it provides services as an excuse to collect taxes, which is an excuse to grow its power over your life and this is an example. Plus last I checked the Constitution doesn't give the government any authority to bribe college students into blind obedience, servitude, and slavery using a check made of fake fiat money as a little birthday present from their Uncle Brandon.

 @9FDPBFS from Texas  answered…3yrs3Y

It should be similar to a merit based scholorship; the percent you pass is how much gets payed.

 @UnstoppablePaellaWomen’s Equality from New York  disagreed…3yrs3Y

I see where you're coming from, and it's a valid point. However, let's consider a student who excels in high school and gets into a good college, but then struggles due to circumstances beyond their control - say illness, or having to work part-time to support their family. According to a merit-based approach, this student could lose their funding and perhaps be unable to continue their education.

From my own experience, I've seen peers struggle in their early semesters, only to turn things around and excel in their final years. Sometimes, it's just about adjusting to a new environment and workload.

So, the question is, should we risk penalizing students who may initially struggle but have the potential to succeed? What could be a fair and effective alternative to the merit-based system you proposed?

 @B4JM6VD from New York  answered…1yr1Y

 @8JCYF7F from Missouri  answered…6yrs6Y

provide more scholarship opportunities for low income students, and provide lower interest rates for student loans overall.

 @8KWVHJ8Women’s Equality from Washington  answered…6yrs6Y

 @8SQZ4BS  from Colorado  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but only for partial tuition

Increase the federal pell grant funding for the low and middle class students. And instead of forgiving student loans, make the interest rate 0% in perpetuity.

 @FinickyAntelopefrom Washington  agreed…3yrs3Y

The Post-9/11 GI Bill, a program that pays for veterans' education, has had significant success. It has not only helped veterans but also stimulated the economy - for every dollar invested, it returned $1.54 to the economy.

 @9D5CBD2 from New York  answered…3yrs3Y

The cost of current education should be reduced.

 @MindRaisinsLibertarian from Idaho  disagreed…3yrs3Y

At private Ivy League universities where tuition is generally high, they offer top-notch education, world-class facilities, and attract renowned faculty. If the federal government were to pay for tuition, it could lead to a compromise on these aspects due to budget constraints. What are your thoughts on this? How do you propose we maintain the quality of education while reducing costs?

 @B4C4KVQ from Virginia  answered…1yr1Y

Students attend school tuition-free, and repay a percentage of their income after graduation, contingent on securing a job with a good salary.

 @B3L4GG5 from Pennsylvania  answered…1yr1Y

Whether the federal government should pay for tuition at four-year colleges and universities is a complex issue with many different arguments.

 @9YFFHFL from Massachusetts  answered…2yrs2Y

only for partial tuition, lower interest rates for student loans and more scholarship opportunities for low-income students

 @9DPC86L from Texas  answered…3yrs3Y

 @9SBR6FL from Tennessee  answered…2yrs2Y

No, states like Tennessee are giving free college to those who graduate within the state by using the lottery and not be able to deviate the funds.

 @B87M3C6 from South Dakota  answered…7mos7MO

Provide full tuition under a certain income bracket, partial at a middle one, and none at a high one.

 @9F56462Progressivefrom Pennsylvania  answered…3yrs3Y

 @9FFK4XM from California  answered…3yrs3Y

No, but should provide lower interest rates for student loans and eliminate for-profit student loan servicers.

 @9DNPBB7  from California  answered…3yrs3Y

Pay for X amount of dollars for the first 2 years of school regardless of school type. Trade, Community, University

 @9GPLPTK from Washington  answered…3yrs3Y

yes but only for degrees that are useful and needed such as engineering and medical. Not like english or humanities.

  @VulcanMan6  from Kansas  disagreed…3yrs3Y

This persistent glorification of STEM fields, along with the suppression and rejection of the humanities, is creating deep societal problems. The promotion of STEM without the humanities just produces intellectual monsters, in which we end up with powerful industries run by people who could engineer weapons of mass destruction yet couldn't explain to someone how the holocaust happened. Our society's cultural and economic disincentivization of the humanities is actively creating this dangerous world where even incredibly "intelligent" people are completely ignorant to the world around them and the atrocities and injustices taking place.

 @9GNGKQN from Pennsylvania  answered…3yrs3Y

Private colleges and institutions have their own right to charge tuition, however there should be more federally aided colleges that provide free education to anyone.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...