Should the United States acquire Greenland?

Yes

No, and the U.S. should drastically reduce its global footprint

No, the U.S. does not need to expand its global footprint at this time

Yes, Greenland is an important asset for U.S. national security

Yes, the U.S. should buy Greenland and mine it for natural resources

No, and the U.S. should close its military base there

let Greenland hold a referendum and let the people there decide whether or not to become apart of the US

only if Greenland votes to become a part of the US. Militarily it would benefit us and the people of Greenland would also be protected by the strongest military in the world

Instead of acquiring Greenland, the U.S. should concentrate on building respectable relationships. Collaboration and not ownership which is key to achieving strategic objectives

let the people of greenland decide if they want to be a part of the US if so great but if not then let them determine their own destiny

If the US wants to acquire Greenland, we should do so peacefully, by having a referendum in which the people of Greenland decide if they want to be a territory of the US. Before Greenland announced its independence, the US should have tried to buy Greenland from Denmark, like we purchased Alaska from Russia.

No, not as long as the citizens of Greenland don't want that. I'm against imperialist expansionism. If the citizens and government of Greenland and Denmark don't want Greenland to be under United States control the only way we would be able to annex them is with military force and I do not agree with doing that at all. I also think it would be a waste of funds at this time to purchase Greenland.

No, unless we have resources there and it's necessary. We need to stop being involved in every single area of the world.

We shoukd work with Greenland and Denmark to expand our military footprint and cooperation there. However, acquiring, purchasing, or annexation should not be on the table.

The US, Greenland, and Denmark should unite as one federation making the three stronger, and directly connecting the US to the rest of mainland Europe.

I don't think we need to or should acquire Greenland but if we did it should be through an agreement where it is purchased from Denmark and not taken.

No, alliances with Europe are more important to our foreign policy and national security than securing Greenland

No, the US has no reason to expand to Greenland, and in the time our country is in there is no good reson to.

Peacefully through diplomatic coersion and financial deal, yes, but methodically, through transitional calculation.

No, we have too much debt already, where are we going to get the money for it? We can't pay our bills now!

Yes, the US should make an offer to purchase Greenland, but make no further moves unless the offer gets a response

If Denmark willingly gives it for money, otherwise the US should try to limit its global footprint, especially in antagonizing allies.

Yes, but only if the price and circumstances are reasonable and in the best interest of the United States.

No, alliances with the EU are more important to our foreign policy and national security than securing Greenland

If Greenland needs to be part of the U.S., then let it, but right now, it would be not nice to acquire it.

Only with the consent of the Greenlandic people through a referndrum but this shouldnt be a national priority until the house is in order

Yes, we would benefit from it strategically, and economically, so too would Greenland. But its unlikely that the purchase would happen.

No, we should maintain friendly relations with Denmark and Greenland to achieve our want for national security and economic objectives through agreement.

No, but I don't believe I have the right to make the decision. No government has the right to acquire territory who's people does not want them to.

no, instead we should deepen our relationship with them and form good trade deals with them in order to get more rare earth minerals from them.

No, while I understand it’s strategic importance, Greenland and it’s people should have their say in if they should be acquired by the USA.

Only if the citizens of Greenland approve. Negotiation with the local government needs to be addressed allowing more US military presence for not only US security but that of of the entire region

Yes, but only after we significantly reduce our deficit, and also only if Denmark agrees to sell it to us

Yes and no; only if the people of Greenland want to join the union can they join the union. If they don't, then we should let them be their own country.

Yes, the U.S should strive to either push for the Independence of Greenland or American Annexation. There is no room for Colonial Powers in the Americas anymore.

Only if the people of Greenland voted in favor of it, and if U.S. settlement was limited to business purposes.

No, but the US should declare Greenland a protectorate and continue in its status of forces agreement with Greenland.

Yes, Greenland is an important strategic area, but we should only acquire it through appropriate means

No, the U.S. should not acquire Greenland by force or manipulation. It is vital for National Security but, they and Denmark are close allies that we should not break ties with. If we could buy Greenland at a fair price, given its proposed resources, it’s a good idea. Otherwise, no to acquiring it but, yes to more U.S. infrastructure there.

Greenland is a sovereign territory of Denmark, and its people are Danish. The US has no right over it unless the Greenlandic people and the Danish government agree to it.

No but we should assist them in their attempts to gain independence from Denmark and then enter whatever trade agreement that they want to make with us

No, Unless most of Greenland's citizens vote and ask to be part of the United States. It is not up to us, it is up to them. We are supposed to uphold and value freedom.

No, the U.S. has everything it needs from the territory already within it's alliance with Denmark through NATO.

Only if they're willing to sell it to us or let us occupy it. It depends heavily on Greenland's consent I would think

This question is irrelevant because Greenland is owned by Denmark which is a NATO ally, we should keep US military bases in Greenland for national security purposes, acquiring Greenland itself is unnecessary

I think it would offer a strategic and economical benefit to the USA but we shouldn't just take it. Ultimately it should up to the people of Greenland.

NO, the United States has no right to another country and this is one of the most asinine things I have ever heard of. This administration is an absolute joke.

If Denmark is willing to sell Greenland then I wouldn't oppose Trump to buy it but Trump shouldn't should just shove a bunch of money in their face and take it.

Yes a long as there is no take over and Greenland has a say in what is happening with benefits to them as well.

No, Greenland is a nearly sovereign nation under Denmark on the road to independence and U.S. acquisition may constitute as both a violation of Danish and Greenlandic sovereignty as well as war-mongering/imperialist behavior

No, the US should just get Greenland to vote, but if they do not approve, the US should just get it's companies to mine there.

In general, I would say no, but if public opinion in Greenland, suddenly flips and Greenlanders want to be part of the United States then by all means, let them join but with their current stance with them, not wanting to join, they should not be forced to join

No, but we should continue to expand our military and economic cooperation with Greenland to enhance national security and access to arctic resources.

If Denmark decides to give us Greenland, we should accept it. Otherwise, we have more important things to deal with.

If the US seeks to buy Greenland and the citizens of Greenland along with the Government of Denmark, all agree, then the US should be able to if it desires.

I would like for the U.S. to acquire Greenland but we should not do it without a referendum of the citizens of Greenland agreeing or a large portion of the Dutch government.

No. Greenland does not wish to become part of America. Denmark does not wish Greenland to become part of America. This means, the only way for America to "acquire" Greenland is by invading it or occupying it militarily, which is an obviously horrible option.

Yes, IF the people of Greenland VOTE for it. If they do NOT vote with a strong majority IN FAVOR, then NO. We can't go around stealing whole countries.

No, the U.S. should maintain its international footprint but for support of proletarian revolutions/rights in other countries.

I would say that Greenland needs to be involved in that decision. The USA isn’t a dictatorship. If it’s good for them and us, then we can try to come to a mutually beneficial agreement.

Yes, Greenland in an important asset for U.S. national security and for harvesting natural resources

No but reach an agreement to expand military presence and other facilities needed for additional US security

I think the people of greenland should have a right to decide. At the moment I do not think we urgently need to aquire the territory, as we are allies with Denmark

God, what an embarrassment to hear our President say that. No, we do not need to expand our global footprint, now or probably ever.

Yes, as long as it is not coercive against either Greenland or Denmark. Alternatively we can drastically increase cooperation with Greenland and Denmark.

Only if both greenland government and population as well as Denmark government agree, and only if a fiscally responsible price point can be ageed upon

Yes and No. Greenland should be acquired, but should be granted similar or superior rights to states to operate as an independent, but deeply affiliated nation.

Only if those through an election want to join USA. They should not be forced to. It should be their choice. Majority.

It should acquire Greenland from Denmark fully but should immediately give it sovereign independence without delay till 2 months.

Depends on what Greenland wants--if they have an interest in becoming part of the United States and it would be beneficial to both parties then it would be acceptable.

There is no need to acquire Greenland. Instead, focus on building a friendly military and diplomatic relationship.

I feel like the U.S shouldn't buy Greenland because Greenland is its own territory and it's been like that for decades.

No, but only if Denmark allows the US to build more bases for national security, there should also be a referendum for the people of Greenland to decide whether they want to be part of the US.

no, because this can be seen as a offense to other countries because it can look like the U.S. is trying to expand and take over.

Only if they are able to purchase or aquire it though peaceful non coercive mean. I.e, the representives of Greenland willingly agree to it.

we don't need to acquire it in order to control it, we get real friendly with whoever does own it and expanding are military base there wouldn't be a bad idea

No, but we should engage in influence operations and potentially station more military members there.

If Greenland wanted to peacefully join that would be fine but they should be made a state/ several states if this happened. The aggressive and imperialist manner I. Which Trump proposed this seems to have soured the idea for Greenlanders so I doubt this would ever happen, at least not for several decades.

Not through any military action. I favor securing the rights to their critical minerals and in return the U.S. can offer military protection to Greenland.

The US should if it is possible. But they should not be seeking it as a major goal. And it is not important enough to threaten Denmark proud for it when they don’t like it.

Yes, if the Greenland people wish to join the United States and Denmark approves of purchases and referendum.

I think it would be a good idea to get Greenland for resources and to expand more but I don't think we need war or any more debt added to the US

Yes, acquire Greenland and make it the 51st state but making it highly autonomous with the ability to become a independent state.

We should help them gain independence and make special deals with them in exchange for protection; same as Alberta and any other Canadian provinces that wants independence and the same deal.

yes, but only if we make a reasonable deal with the Danish government, which I know is very unlikely

No. We should maintain our current military bases and form a stronger cooperation with the Greenlandic government.

Acquiring Greenland presents potential strategic benefits for the U.S., including access to vital minerals and control of strategic maritime and air approaches, as well as economic opportunities from the Arctic's resources. However, acquiring Greenland faces significant obstacles, including legal and international opposition to annexation, the need to gain support from the autonomous Danish territory's population, and the potential for diplomatic backlash that could strengthen rival powers' positions in the Arctic.
Arguments for Acquisition
Strategic Importance:
Greenland'…  Read more;s location is vital for controlling the GIUK Gap, a key maritime route, and for North American air defense.
Natural Resources:
The territory is rich in rare earth minerals and other resources crucial for defense, technology, and the green energy transition.
Economic Potential:
The island offers vast economic potential through access to mineral deposits and hydrocarbons, with emerging shipping routes in the Arctic.
Countering Rivals:
Acquiring Greenland could prevent rivals like China and Russia from gaining influence and access to its strategic resources and location.
Obstacles to Acquisition
Legal and International Law:
.
Acquiring territory through acquisition has been largely abandoned and is taboo under modern international law, making any forced annexation potentially illegal and a significant international incident.
Danish Sovereignty:
.
Greenland is a semi-autonomous territory under Danish sovereignty, and Denmark has no intention of selling it.
Greenlandic Public Opinion:
.
There is not a significant appetite for a deal with the U.S. within Greenland itself, and many Greenlanders would prefer closer relations with other nations.
Diplomatic Backlash:
.
A forced acquisition would likely trigger strong negative reactions from the international community and could backfire by increasing rival powers' presence in the Arctic.
Current U.S. Relations
Existing Agreements:
The U.S. already has a significant milita

Yes, Greenland is strategically valuable to us, and acquiring it from Denmark gets a European power out of the Western Hemisphere, and is consistent with the Monroe Doctrine.

No, but the United States should make it clear that no other nation will be permitted to use Greenland as a military base, especially not China or another geopolitically hostile foreign nation

Yes, but only when an union with Canada (and other nations within the American continent) is made, formalizing a Pan-American Federation.

Yes, if either Denmark decides to sell Greenland and/or an independent Greenland wants to join the U.S.

Yes, it is important for national security. But, it needs to be done in a manner that benefits all parties and does not detract from the benefits gained.

No, any further military expansion and mining for resources should be done multilaterally since Denmark is an ally anyways

Yes, but only use it to allow for geographic isolation between populations in order to allow for speciation among our species and don't mine it for natural resources

No, why? Acquiring Greenland will create more problems, and we already have enough of those. However, we can strengthen alliances and trade agreements with Greenland and get pretty much the same benefits as we could with annexation, with far fewer headaches.

Yes, but only if Greenlanders want it, and ideally to prevent worse alternatives like Chinese influence.