Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

4701 Replies

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...12yrs12Y

More

 @9FRPS8J from California  agreed…2yrs2Y

welfare just needs to be harder to qualify they should testify the kids and view how they are actually living.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...12yrs12Y

Fewer

 @9FRPS8J from California  disagreed…2yrs2Y

There is A lot of Fraud with welfare theirs many people like Undocumented mothers using their documented kids to ask our government to give them money and its a lot of money and the money goes to enjoying life instead it should be money to just survive to have shelter bills or food that is only certain brands not high quality foods . high brand food should be hard earned.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...12yrs12Y

More, reform the system so that it supplements, rather than replaces, a working income

 @9GVPPRJ  from California  disagreed…2yrs2Y

It is a good idea to save some money to use it for helping other needs in the country. However, some individuals only or main income is from Welfare so it will only worsen the problem.

  @HelcovichEmireRepublican from Maryland  disagreed…6mos6MO

If their only source of income is welfare, then that means they aren't producing anything for society, therefore they don't deserve to consume anything from society either.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...12yrs12Y

Fewer, current benefits do not provide enough support

 @9HJWKMN from Washington  agreed…2yrs2Y

This is apparent based on the extent of homelessness. The same people who express the most negative sentiment about the homeless are, ironically, often the same ones who say we need to have more restrictions on welfare. I know people who have "invisible" disabilities(not obvious to a stranger at first glance, but very real nonetheless), and it has been way too hard for them to get assistance. They're living with me, and I can't just let them become homeless. When society doesn't share the burden, it all falls onto a smaller number of kind people to shoulder it.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...11yrs11Y

More, and deny benefits to immigrants

 @9F5WMD6from Northern Mariana Islands  disagreed…2yrs2Y

Immigration is a very useful way to improve the state of our country, not only well educated immigrants, but uneducated ones as well for a variety of reasons. Having more working age members within a society is always useful, especially since they specifically want to be in the United States. Relating to that, attracting more immigrants is important, providing benefits to immigrants will bring more in, especially educated ones. Furthermore, these are not simply numbers, these are human beings. Helping them through welfare is important, as it is with everyone in our great nation.

 @DovesSerenityfrom Kansas  disagreed…2yrs2Y

While I agree that immigration can bring numerous benefits to our country, we must also consider the economic implications. Welfare programs are primarily funded by taxpayers and distributing these resources to a larger population, including immigrants, could strain the system. For instance, in California, a state with a high immigrant population, the welfare system has been under severe stress due to their inclusive policies. This often leads to less resources for citizens who have contributed to the system for years. How would you propose we balance the needs of our citizens and the desire to assist immigrants without overburdening our welfare system?

  @HelcovichEmireRepublican from Maryland  commented…8mos8MO

Legal immigrants should still be able to get welfare benefits. It should be the illegals that are denied all welfare benefits or any sort of government aid. The government should be spending less on programs like welfare so taxes for citizens can be reduced.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...11yrs11Y

Fewer, and ensure benefits go to those that need it most

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...11yrs11Y

More, but increase benefits for the elderly and disabled

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...12yrs12Y

More, current benefits should be capped

  @HelcovichEmireRepublican from Maryland  agreed…6mos6MO

Welfare spending is too much, and needs to be reduced and capping welfare benefits is an excellent way to do this, as well as testing and terminating all benefits to drug-users.

 @967FDNC from Oklahoma  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8G4T258Patriotic Peoples from Oklahoma  answered…5yrs5Y

Leave it the same for most but ban illegal immigrants and those who don't pay taxes. Also increase benefits for elderly and disabled as thier fixed income isn't much and most elderly get $12-25$ and that is not enough.

 @8FLK3FN from Idaho  answered…5yrs5Y

I feel like it should be a lot more personalized and there should be an emphasis on not being able to cheat the system.

 @9665XKT from Oklahoma  answered…3yrs3Y

 @9GSGPR3 from Indiana  answered…2yrs2Y

People should be encouraged and expected to provide for themselves as much as they are able to do so. Government does not exist to enable its citizenry in self destructive cycles of laziness but rather to help it rise up above challenges and help it be self reliant. No illegal immigrant should receive any form of welfare as it creates an undue burden on the us taxpayer.

  @VulcanMan6  from Kansas  disagreed…2yrs2Y

 @9G3DHMG from Wisconsin  answered…2yrs2Y

Fewer, in fact, all welfare assistance programs for people (including those due to illness, natural disasters, and corporate bailouts / welfare) should be abolished. Those who apply for such benefits should receive the death penalty.

 Deletedanswered…2yrs2Y

Regardless, we should abolish all welfare programs

  @HelcovichEmireRepublican from Maryland  commented…6mos6MO

A minimal level of welfare is important to ensure that those who truly can't find a job can still live

 @9NTH43Q from North Carolina  answered…1yr1Y

Fewer, direct benefits towards those most in need who are working hardest to escape their situation and ensure that all benefits supplement rather than replace a working income

 @9SR4GDNDemocrat  from Utah  answered…1yr1Y

Reform current benefits that do not include work requirements, address barriers to unemployment, and have a time limit.

 @B5SYZ76 from New York  answered…4mos4MO

Increase benefits for the elderly and disabled and impeach Trump for gutting social programs to pay trillions to billionaires

 @9ZLX6GNDemocrat from South Carolina  answered…11mos11MO

There should be common-sense reform that may involve an increase or decrease in restrictions, depending on the situation.

 @9HB5MKV from North Carolina  answered…2yrs2Y

Less. Direct benefits towards those most in need and reform the system so it supplements rather than replaces a working income. Anyone on welfare should be doing all they can to get off it and should be provided resources to help find a stable, suitable job if needed.

 @9FRLXGC from New Jersey  answered…2yrs2Y

More, deny benefits to illegal immigrants, and increase benefits for those who could be eligible for them (Elderly, disabled, etc.)

 @9D3RPBQfrom Guam  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9S2PDWW from Virginia  answered…1yr1Y

There should be Great restrictions on our welfare Benefits, illegal immigrants, and immigrants without legal status, and criminals should not be able to to gain access to Welfare benefits. And the benefits should be heavily maintained and surveyed in order to ensure that there is not over generosity.

 @9L74FFC from North Carolina  answered…2yrs2Y

Neither, reform the system to ensure it supplements instead of replaces a working income and direct benefits towards those most in need who are making concerted efforts to get off welfare

 @9L4Z23BIndependent  from Pennsylvania  answered…2yrs2Y

More. End all federal welfare programs and replace with a negative income tax for low income earners

 @9JDPKH4Democrat from New York  answered…2yrs2Y

Fewer. the income cap on welfare benefits should be raised to the point that a beneficiary of welfare can sustain their living, and the cap should be set at a rate that the recipient can independently afford what the benefits provide.

 @9GN5KWP from North Carolina  answered…2yrs2Y

Fewer. Ensure that benefits go to those most in need and that benefits only supplement instead of replace a working income. Anyone on welfare should be doing all they can to get off it

 @9GJTNP9 from Maryland  answered…2yrs2Y

Reform the system so that it supplements a working income, but also make sure the benefits are going to those who need it most.

 @9GSJY34 from Colorado  answered…2yrs2Y

Require people to buy better food. People should not be spending a piece of my paycheck on trash *** gas station food. It is inefficient to the consumer and the ones paying for it.

 @8XT2DCV from California  answered…4yrs4Y

 @9F9LZ94 from Missouri  answered…2yrs2Y

Fewer, also give benefits to immigrants, also increase benefits for the elderly and disabled, and reform the system so that it supplements, rather than replaces, a working income.

 @9F4B2VJ from Missouri  answered…2yrs2Y

Fewer restrictions for the elderly and disabled while reforming the system to prevent people from gaming the system. More restrictions against individuals who aren’t in the country legally, the government’s duty/obligation is to its citizens and those who are here legally and we shouldn’t incentivize people arriving illegally

 @9DRHX76  from Georgia  answered…2yrs2Y

The implementation of a universal basic income would render this irrelevant.

 @9DRH6Q7 from Texas  answered…2yrs2Y

I don't feel the restrictions to who gets it is too harsh but I do feel funding should be expanded especially in situations involving children.

 @9DGB99H from New Jersey  answered…2yrs2Y

Fewer, but decrease the need to rely on welfare benefits by investing in affordable housing and healthcare and by bolstering labor bargaining rights.

 @9DD79J2Republican from North Carolina  answered…2yrs2Y

Expand it for those who need it the most but deny it to illegal immigrants.

 Deletedanswered…2yrs2Y

Fewer, and change our current welfare state into a universal, welfare state

 @9D769PB from Georgia  answered…2yrs2Y

The qualifications do not adequately support the world and how inflation/ cost of living impacts people.

 @9D4ZMSQLibertarian from Texas  answered…2yrs2Y

The vast majority of the current welfare recipients should be removed from the welfare rolls, or have additional restrictions placed upon them in order to continue to receive assistance. This will free up money for the truly needy.

 @9D4R3SKDemocrat from Texas  answered…2yrs2Y

Maintain much of the current structure but reconfigure it to support income rather that replace it entirely, otherwise it breeds complacency.

 @summonashesPeace and Freedom from Massachusetts  answered…3yrs3Y

 @97VRQ32 from Pennsylvania  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8RNYFCZ from Minnesota  answered…5yrs5Y

Regardless, reform the system so that it supplements, rather than replaces, a working income. Except in the cases of elderly and disabled persons.

 @8NSJ4GQ from Ohio  answered…5yrs5Y

 @B7K4LF3 from Kentucky  answered…4 days4D

More, there are too many people who are refusing to work, having children without supporting them, and acting as a drain on the system while people actually working can't make ends meet doing all the right things.

 @B7JTQ9L from Ohio  answered…5 days5D

The benefits of our current welfare systems should be increased gradually as a person grows closer to citizenship

 @B7HXLJW from New Jersey  answered…6 days6D

More, but deny to immigrants and ensure it benefits more for the elderly and disabled. And for those who are not elderly or disabled, it should supplement, rather than replace, a working income

 @B7FDXW4 from Texas  answered…1wk1W

welfare shouldn’t be equal on all levels, such as a newly legal immigrant shouldn’t have as much welfare as a elderly legal immigrant

 @B7F3NWC from Missouri  answered…2wks2W

Deny benefits to immigrants. Benefits shouldn't pay more than a working person who doesn't qualify makes.

 @B7D74G3 from Nebraska  answered…2wks2W

I think there should be more to ensure that able bodied people are not just using the government money for things that are not needed to survive

 @B7BSZRY from Mississippi  answered…2wks2W

Fewer. As long as you’re a legal citizen and you qualify whether it’s old age, disability you should get it

 @B7BHT9T from Illinois  answered…2wks2W

Regardless, the aim should be to lower the amount spent, but still should vary based on the recipient’s home area cost of living.

 @B79WBLC from Illinois  answered…2wks2W

Fewer, for both "fewer" reasons stated above. Also, raise the income threshold that qualifies an individual for welfare.

 @B79GQWCNo Labels from California  answered…2wks2W

As of right now there should be fewer restrictions. However, if in the future more programs are available and adequate to support low income households, then increasing restriction on welfare benefits should not hurt too much.

 @B78SYHH from Wisconsin  answered…2wks2W

It should be reformed to decrease the number on Medicaid and to encourage recipients to work as they are able (with slower replacement of benefits as income increases).

 @B76TJYJ from Illinois  answered…3wks3W

More, but increase benefits for the elderly and disabled, and for childcare in single parent households.

 @B74G2BR  from Massachusetts  answered…3wks3W

I believe a welfare program can be incredibly beneficial for states and a nation as a whole, but the idea on making sure that the money is going to the right people. What I mean by this is ensuring it is going to responsible parents who will use the money to not only benefit themselves, but their children as a whole.

 @B74RWR9 from Nevada  answered…3wks3W

No benefits to illegals or refugees at all. Increase benefits for the elderly over 50 and the disabled and those who really need the benefits.

 @B73Z89C from Washington  answered…3wks3W

Increase the amount to match the economy, which would help provide more benefits for those who barely miss the mark.

 @B739WMTfrom Maine  answered…4wks4W

reform the welfare system so it is desighned to get people back to work through training. limmit the unemployment benefit to a few months so people are incentivised to work. also increase welfare to the highest possible level to our army vets , penioners and the disabled so they can have a great quality of life

 @B72YF2Q from Maryland  answered…4wks4W

Welfare benefits should be restructured to help people 'step down' from services as they become more independent, when possible, rather than an all or nothing approach.

 @B72TKGJ from Idaho  answered…4wks4W

Need to break up cities and large orgs/committees and focus on small population size in towns. Let the locals take care of their people.

 @B72363K from California  answered…4wks4W

More, implement case by case lifetime benefit limits with work and educational requirements that lead to financial self-sufficiency. This would initially be costly when implemented with supportive services but cost-efficient in the long-term.

 @B6XXJJW from Texas  answered…4wks4W

It depends on the program. There are so many programs that constitute "welfare" in the US, that you need to be granular with reform.

 @B6SBDP7 from Florida  answered…1mo1MO

Fewer, current benefits do not provide enough support but do not give benefits to illegal immigrants

 @B6PS78B from Minnesota  answered…1mo1MO

Regardless, the United States should shift to a producerist economy that allows for all people to be self-sufficient and eliminates the need for welfare.

 @B3VGV2T  from California  answered…1mo1MO

The debate over welfare benefit restrictions involves competing perspectives: one side advocates for more restrictions to promote self-sufficiency and reduce dependency, while the other calls for fewer restrictions to address the "cliff effect," remove barriers to assistance, and support recipients struggling with health, disability, and caregiving responsibilities.
Arguments for More Restrictions
Promoting Self-Sufficiency:
Proponents argue that restrictions, such as work requirements, encourage individuals to find employment and become self-sufficient, reducing long-term welfare…  Read more

 @B6NLCBJ from California  answered…2mos2MO

More on illegal immigrants, and immigrants who are violent or criminals and try to figure out some more restrictions on how they have to have a job and figure out ways to get more jobs

 @B6M2DGB from Vermont  answered…2mos2MO

The amount people receive should be much higher but they need to be tied to counseling, drug treatment and meaningful career education. They benefits currently work is a treadmill of learned helplessness

 @B6LKVN5 from Kentucky  answered…2mos2MO

Keep same requirements, except require at least work for all recipients and require permanent residency for all legal immigrants currently residing in the US along with work authorization before allowing benefits

 @B6HS8DGRepublican from California  answered…2mos2MO

I feel like we should try to find a compromise and try to deny benefits to illegal immigrants and try to cap it at a reasonable rate and try to decrease the ones for the elderly and try to reform the system and try to figure out the best compromise

 @B6HKJJB from Kentucky  answered…2mos2MO

More restrictions in general, but increase benefits for the elderly, and deny benefits to immigrants.

 @9WXG3RT  from Pennsylvania  answered…2mos2MO

More, but make sure benefits go to those who need it most, personalize benefits especially for the elderly, and focus on not being able to cheat the system or giving any benefits to illegal immigrants.

 @B63V9DM  from Texas  answered…3mos3MO

Neutral, change the restrictions so that the benefits are easier to obtain for people who’s jobs need them while making it harder for people to take advantage of the system long term

 @B63F4Y8 from California  answered…3mos3MO

Fewer, welfare should not be determined on age, income or status, America should say " American people, Take what you need" regardless of rich or poor, those who need it should take and those who can provide should provide.

 @B638Z3H from Colorado  answered…3mos3MO

More, instead we should switch to a universal income to cover the very basic necessities of food and water, increase benefits for the elderly and disabled, current benefits should be caped, and reform the system so that it supplements, rather than replaces a working income.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...