Should the government fund the World Health Organization?

Yes, but only relative to the amount that other countries contribute

Yes, but decrease the amount

It depends on the circumstance.

No, the government should not fund any non-governmental organisations.

The World Health Organization (WHO) should receive funding from all United Nations recognized countries. However, a country should be allowed to either restrict or stop funding entirely. Should a country choose to restrict funding, a formal process must be developed so as all countries understand the reasoning for it.

After a full investigation is conducted on how WHO handled the COVID crisis, we should adjust our contribution accordingly.

Yes, but only if there is serious reform.

I don’t have enough information

Yes but in proportion to what other countries are supporting and economically where the government stands.

i need to learn more about this topic

Drastically reduce or end funding for as long as non-communist countries continue to have diplomatic relations with China (PRC) (instead of Taiwan (ROC) and recognize it's government as the sole legitimate government government of all China, and allowing people with PRC passports or passports with PRC visas and stamp, to enter the borders of non-communist countries

Yes, and fund national and local programs as well

Yes, but only if the US government gets to specify what the money goes towards that way it is not squandered

we should contribute to the WHO, but also dramatically increase the percentage of our spending domestically

Not enough information for judgement, so I will remain neutral right now.

No, and imprison Bill Gates for crimes against humanity

Yes but in proportion to what other countries are supporting and economically where the government stands in terms of debt

Yes but not to the detriment of healthcare in our own country.

Yes and no for this topic.

Yes as the WHO is what informs the World about viruses, diseases, and gives us recommendations for it. Highly recommend it!!

Don’t know what it is

You should contribute the same as other country's and fund local programs more

Everyone should be funded equally

We should only contribute comparable to everyone else, but this would be so that we have more funding for national and local programs.

Yes, but only after thorough investigation rules out any corruption without the WHO.

don;t know what that is

Keep the same amount.

Yes, but decrease the amount and fund more national and local programs instead

No, and fund national programs instead.

Yes, and not just proportional to each country's ability to contribute, but additionally to supplement/substitute the contribution from nations unable to do so

Yes, as long as bureaucratic corruption is dealt with.

No! It is corrupt and partisan as shown by the covid-19 "pandemic"/abuse

No. We should also have nothing to do with the WHO.

It depends on how much the WHO needs and how much other countries contribute.

Keep the same amount

No, and the government should not give funds to any organizations

What is that

don't have enough knowledge to say

Not informed enough on this topic

Don’t know enough

Yes, but there should be more accountability for government executives. Telling the truth and factual information for the well-being of society

Find up to other countries contributions, but also focus on federal issues with higher importance on those

yes but there has to be a limit on what we contribute and the amount we do decide to contribute needs to take in to account what others contribute, whats going on at the time that would need the money, and if we might possibly need the money some where else

I think the U.S. should fund the WHO, but the contributions should be monitored closely to ensure accountability and efficiency, while also maintaining strong domestic health programs.

Yes, It is important to contribute to global healthcare but we need more attention to national and local programs.

I believe there is deep corruption in the World Health Organization and that until they are investigated we should run national and local programs instead.

no but each country should have their own funding and if they cant afford it then the us gov must help

It depends on how much we are putting In to fund because if we are funding it fully the other countries just take advantage of us

Yes, but I think that the government should fund the WHO, national programs, and local programs. Any step within medicine is a huge step, and funding helps continue research, etc.

Yes but not spending more on it than medicaid because the ones paying for both are American people and Americans should be prioritized over people from another nation.

Yes, it should, but not too much, The majority of funding should go to local organizations like the CDC.

We don't depend on WHO as largely as other countries, it is still important to properly maintain health in the world but we shouldn't be funneling a large amount of money into it.

I think our government should contribute to funding th organization, but we shouldn't have any obligation to pay for most of it

I believe that we should concentrate on making our country better first, instead of other countries. I believe we should help out as much as we can, but still make our own country the priority. We can't help other countries if we can't help ourselves first

If the WHO was doing a good job specifically focusing on health than I would agree, but the current actions the WHO is doing I majorly disagree with

Yes, and increase the amount to seize control of it and enforce our health standards across the world

Countries should contribute payment equal to the amount others contribute other resources. If other countries aren't doing anything, you shouldn't have to keep paying.

yes but only if we have spare money after were done with out internal and external affair it should be one of the last things we donate or invest into

Yes, but the investment should be categorical not organization based so if the WHO is not delivering on promises the funds can be invested into other global health initiatives.

the government should fund the World Health organization, but it should also push for reforms such as increasing transparency, streamlining decision making, and ensuring funding is sustainable and equitably distributed.

Yes, we can continue contributing but we should work on local programs, especially in rural America.

Yes, as long as the World Health Organization and its motives are monitored and made publicly available to view

does the government have to do everything? if the world health organization has anything to do with the government then yes, if not, then no

I think we should put a little bit of funds into the World Health but for the most part we need to fund national and local programs more.

Yes but allow citizens to regulate what they do and vote on food bans for the health for current and future generations.

Yes, but on the stance that we cannot pay more money for certain political or religious interests to be inappropriately inflated or emphasized.

The government should fund W.H.O, it is an important thing to promote health and to deal with dangerous things that can cost a human life. Health is important, without W.H.O, there wouldn't be cures for diseases, and cancer, etc. It's good to fund the organization to help those who study to overcome dangerous health hazards for the better future for the youth who are still growing.

Other countries besides the US should also fund the WHO, but the allocation of the budget that's used responsibly needs to be done.

I think that yes we should but I also think that everyone else should help because it involves our whole world.

Trump has long charged that WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus covered up China’s responsibility for the Covid pandemic

I think the UN should be an independent governing body that acts as a federal government for the whole planet therefore funding for the WHO falls on the UN governing body

It depends on how large the current issue is on how much the government should contribute. EX: higher lethality gives more funding.

Somewhat, because it will benefit us in the future but it should be decreased. Additionally, people should work to try and make a living not expect the to be handed everything for free.

it should be compliant with the issues that America has. For instance we should try to improve relations within residents in the US rather than funding so much to the world health organization. To improve the things happening in the US rather than improving the world.

Yes, and fund foreign organizations intent on maintaining the health and living conditions of citizens outside of American borders.

We should focus on our own nation and only fund other countries if there is something like a new and deadly disease.