@9F78B3PRepublican8mos8MO
Our founding fathers wished us not to get involved in foreign affairs and would likely want us to ensure our country stays safe from foreign attack and evil deeds.
@9F6ZBWV8mos8MO
When the constitution states ¨all men are created equal¨ it does not limit it to Americans only, but everyone on earth.
@9F6PRHY8mos8MO
My best argument against the postilion on terrorism is that they didn't fully convert into their american citizenship of maybe they didn't take the test.
@9F9HTVY8mos8MO
They can get their citizenship and come to the United States and they should be given the same constitutional rights.
@9F8FP6T8mos8MO
Rights should be inalienable if it is a legitimate Right. A Constitutional trial for someone willing to fight a Constitutionally founded nation is Justice for both parties.
@9F8CCCL8mos8MO
Even if the person is not a US citizen they need to be sentenced for his actions like others in the country.
@9FL54FZ7mos7MO
By that argument, we are infringing on other countries' sovereignty. We wouldn't want Canada to assassinate Americans in the United States because they aren't Canadian citizens.
@9F7GTDQRepublican8mos8MO
The perpetrators of 9/11 were seen on surveillance cameras before the attacks. They were conducting seemingly day-to-day activities, but their actions resulted in the deaths of 3,000 innocent Americans. Criminals like them must be targeted and executed to prevent the deaths of innocent people in the United States. Most importantly, individuals like these men who roam the streets of this country freely and do not show any indication of planning an attack absolutely do NOT deserve constitutional protection.
We should present anyone being tried in the United States Justice system with the same rights, so that there's no confusion on what sort of rights any defendant may have.
The historical activity of users engaging with this answer.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
