.
Your comparison of a fetus to a person on life support is thought-provoking. However, the key difference here lies in the realm of potential versus actual life. A person on life support has already experienced life outside the womb, while a fetus has not. This distinction is why many legal and medical professionals differentiate between the two.
As for financial aid and adoption, the point is not that they are completely ineffectual, but that they are not guaranteed solutions and can carry their own sets of challenges. Considering abortion does not mean a woman lacks compassion for her potential child; rather, it could be an incredibly tough decision made in the face of complex circumstances.
Your thoughts on the potential life vs actual life distinction? Do you think it's a valid differentiation?
@9FZKSH6 8mos8MO
The fetus is a living, growing human being--not a potential life. It is scientifically proven that it is a life, because it meets the 5 criterion of life. There is no difference in value between a baby in the womb, grandma on life support, or joe smith driving to work. All are live humans and deserve the same rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
So I disagree, however you bring good points
