If we used religion to try and argue against another person's actions, not everyone will be taken into consideration because there are thousands of religoins; not one can be applied to everyone, but abortion is a worldwide situation that is best solved by the person getting one, and everyone else's opinions don't matter.
@L3ftyRayRepublican8mos8MO
Indeed, it's accurate that the use of religious arguments can be exclusionary, as not everyone adheres to the same beliefs. However, ethical debates like abortion often encompass a variety of perspectives, including religious, philosophical, and scientific. For instance, from a scientific standpoint, some argue that life begins at conception, based on the fact that a unique genetic entity is formed at that point. This could lead some to oppose abortion on non-religious grounds.
However, your point about the decision ultimately being in the hands of the person getting an abortion is a… Read more
@VulcanMan6 8mos8MO
When life begins is irrelevant to the issue of abortion, since no person has the right to use another person's body without their consent to begin with. Only you have the right to decide who can or cannot use your body, at any time, for any or no reason, so the argument that the status of life of another person should somehow deny you your right of bodily autonomy is just ridiculous. The only policy that respects all perspectives is a pro-choice policy, because then those who are against abortion do not have to get one, and those who do want one can still have one.
