Political Debate on Economy

Nope. I’m voting for Robert Kennedy Jr. and pushing friends and family to vote for him too.

RFK will make the economy even more horrible, he's still a statist, big government leftist who supports more federal intervention in our economy when in reality their should be a wall of separation between Economy & State.

For the notion of a "wall of separation" between Economy & State, it's worth noting that even Adam Smith, the father of modern capitalism, acknowledged the need for government in certain sectors of the economy. He wrote extensively on the role of government in providing public goods, enforcing contracts, and ensuring competition.

That being said, what do you think about RFK Jr.'s stance on environmental issues? He's been a staunch advocate for renewable energy, arguing that it can stimulate economic growth while also addressing the serious problem of climate change. Don't you think this could be a win-win situation?

If you agree with the belief that government is at least responsible for preventing killing, then why destroy regulations on corporations to reduce their pollution and effect on the surrounding area? As the emissions rise, people die. Climate change is real, I’ve thrown over 20 pieces of evidence in a single comment at you before, and if it were caused by the sun, then the entire atmosphere would be heating up as the heat would pass through all layers, but the warming has stayed in the lower atmosphere. CO2 has also been proven to cause a greenhouse effect, Venus itself stands as an exa…  Read moremple, and as earth’s concentration of it increases, so too does the temperature. Corporations remain massive emitters, along with being polluters of the land around them as well, exemplified by the Industrial Revolution era factories, the Deepwater Horizon and Amazon Rainfordt oil spills. Then there’s the East Palestine, Ohio train derailment, or the large amounts of black lung cases in coal miners. This type of business needs regulation, and as such, we need those types of environmental policies.

Again, you've begged the question, assuming carbon emission kill people and harm the enviroment to argue for precisely that, when in fact the reverse is true – most animals are carbon-based life forms, our plants depend on carbon for their survival, and carbon has in fact been called the gas of life for precisely those reasons. There is no proof carbon emissions is heating the earth and a cr-pload of evidence that leads us to assume it's in fact the sun. check out ceres-science.com, which has multiple Ivy League scientists contributing, for more info on my position.

CO2 is literally proven to do so, it may be good for plants, but too much is a problem, a massive problem in fact. The normal amount of co2 in the atmosphere is about 270 ppm. That’s doubled to over 420 ppm. During the birth of the Industrial Revolution in 1800, humanity emitted about .25 gigatons of CO2, but now, we emit over 35, and our oceans and land has taken the brunt of the damage, but a good portion of that remains in the atmosphere. Since 1800, our temperature has increased by an average of 1 degree Celsius, and we can visibly see the effects of it. If the sun was causing this,…  Read more then the entire atmosphere would be heating up, but it’s not, the lower levels are increasing in heat, as if the outside is a shield, warming the earth from the inside. That’s the greenhouse effect, the majority of which being caused by human emissions from sources from CO2 to water vapor and methane. We know CO2 has increased dramatically due to a spike in oceanic salinity and carbon reserves inside the soil, which is a common signal of the increase of it. When ocean salinity increases, oxygen-producing bacteria actually are negatively influenced, causing them to die and decreasing the earth’s ability to actually use that carbon dioxide. It may be the gas of life, but too much of any gas causes extreme amounts of death. This is one tiny portion of the evidence for climate change being caused by humans, and the correlation may not equal causation, but we definitely have a lot of proof of causation.

https://www.ceres-science.com/post/has-the-sun-s-true-role-in-global-warming-been-miscalculated

https://www.ceres-science.com/post/major-problems-identified-in-data-adjustments-applied-to-a-widely-used-global-temperature-dataset

https://www.ceres-science.com/post/dr-willie-soon-s-interview-by-tucker-carlson-december-2023

Links in general don’t work on this site but I’ll look up the article myself.

Good. Ceres Science institute, Dr. Willie Soon.