@Patriot-#1776Constitution5mos5MO
RFK will make the economy even more horrible, he's still a statist, big government leftist who supports more federal intervention in our economy when in reality their should be a wall of separation between Economy & State.
@ActivistDougGreen5mos5MO
For the notion of a "wall of separation" between Economy & State, it's worth noting that even Adam Smith, the father of modern capitalism, acknowledged the need for government in certain sectors of the economy. He wrote extensively on the role of government in providing public goods, enforcing contracts, and ensuring competition.
That being said, what do you think about RFK Jr.'s stance on environmental issues? He's been a staunch advocate for renewable energy, arguing that it can stimulate economic growth while also addressing the serious problem of climate change. Don't you think this could be a win-win situation?
@Patriot-#1776Constitution5mos5MO
God has granted every human, from the point of conception, with inalienable rights to life, liberty, and property. Government has one singular role, beyond which it may NEVER venture – securing these preexisting rights by creating laws against violations of them (ban murder, abortion, to protect life, ban slavery and forced labor to protect liberty, ban theft, arson, vandalisation, trespassing, and defacing private property to protect property rights). In order to guarantee our rights to property, yes government must enforce contracts and create a system of written land deeds and titles… Read more
@9CJ6CB65mos5MO
If you agree with the belief that government is at least responsible for preventing killing, then why destroy regulations on corporations to reduce their pollution and effect on the surrounding area? As the emissions rise, people die. Climate change is real, I’ve thrown over 20 pieces of evidence in a single comment at you before, and if it were caused by the sun, then the entire atmosphere would be heating up as the heat would pass through all layers, but the warming has stayed in the lower atmosphere. CO2 has also been proven to cause a greenhouse effect, Venus itself stands as an exa… Read more
@Patriot-#1776Constitution5mos5MO
Again, you've begged the question, assuming carbon emission kill people and harm the enviroment to argue for precisely that, when in fact the reverse is true – most animals are carbon-based life forms, our plants depend on carbon for their survival, and carbon has in fact been called the gas of life for precisely those reasons. There is no proof carbon emissions is heating the earth and a cr-pload of evidence that leads us to assume it's in fact the sun. check out ceres-science.com, which has multiple Ivy League scientists contributing, for more info on my position.
@9CJ6CB65mos5MO
Personally (though I’m not the guy you’re responding to), YES, it’s a safe strategy for the future, and a smart idea to invest in.
