The conversation involves a heated debate on whether a fetus should be considered a baby or not, with users discussing scientific and moral implications.
@TautCockatooRepublican2mos2MO
How is killing babies a “protection”?
I think there’s a disconnect.
@TreatyVictoriaSocialist2mos2MO
A zygote, blastocyst or fetus is not a baby.
There's potential, albeit messy, that a fetus becomes a baby.
A fetus transitions to a baby, therefore a sui generis homo sapien, upon exiting the birth canal.
@Patriot-#1776Constitution2mos2MO
Demonstrably false. From the point of conception, the new life is a baby. He/she is a separate individual than his/her mother. Science.
@fart_smeller682mos2MO
how is it separate if it still lives in and feeds off the birthing person? plus, there's no brain, nothing going on with a fetus. it's basically nothing until much later in the growth process.
@Patriot-#1776Constitution2mos2MO
Alright, "Fart_Smeller68" – let's logically examine your arguments, and discuss some highly disturbing moral implications it brings about. Number 1:
How is it separate if it still lives in and feeds off the birthing person?
First off, I'd like to share something exciting about the English language with you – the great ancient word "mother." It's actually been used for (get this!) thousands of years to describe women, who give birth to babies, because women are the only people who give birth to babies. It's your lucky day – instead of humiliatingRead more
@fart_smeller682mos2MO
yeah i knew birthing person would make you mad lmao you're so chronically on this site it's just sad. you don't understand science and you're embarrassing yourself.
@Patriot-#1776Constitution2mos2MO
"You don't understand science and you're embarrassing yourself," says the person failing to acknowledge the most fundamental components of biological reality
@fart_smeller682mos2MO
where have i failed to acknowledge the most fundamental components of biological reality? where?? where??? please, I must know... i hate sounding stupid and unknowledgeable on a discussion website filled with incels worse than reddit!
@Patriot-#1776Constitution2mos2MO
Oh, by using the term "birthing person" you implied that people can switch genders ... which is demonstrably false and opposite biological reality. In addition, claiming unborn children are not human is ignoring biological reality as well – it can be proven that they are separate human beings from the point of conception.
