Should the government regulate the development and deployment of autonomous vehicles?

Yes, they should developed with time and secure that they are fully safe to be on roads.

There needs to be some form of validation of its safety before mass deployment as well as a system of accountability for accidents.

No, but companies should be held accountable if their vehicles malfunction and compromise the safety of their passengers and the road

government can subpoena developers to ensure safety but can't make directly make changes to the cars themselves

no but just government should ensure that autonomous vehciles are safe and that there are adequate tests to show that they are fit to drive on the road just like any other car

There should be high standards for their 3d space recognition software as well as encryption and hack prevention
LEAD BY EXAMPLE will always make it better for everyone else while also leading the market for being the first to actually go through with it

They should ensure that they are safe but they should not overstep their power by forcing everyone to have electric cars or crazy expensive alternative fuel cars.

i think that vehicles that can be driven with a computer are not safe and unpredictable therefore not only do i think there should be regulations i think they should be strict.

I don't think combining human-run vehicles with autonomous vehicles, on the same roads, is either safe nor ethical.

Yes, but we do not want to hinder innovation too much.

While government regulation is not recommended when working with companies developing autonomous vehicles. There needs to be a mandated baseline for all vehicles so companies cannot monopolize the market, take shortcuts to meet their bottom line and to ensure the safety of people on the road with said vehicles.

AI in any form is scary. Having a computer drive you around, is dangerous. It could always have a fluke and not work as it's supposed to. I've seen videos of Self-Driving cars that act like uber, and sometimes they just don't work right. We're not ready for self-driving cars, but maybe one day.

The government should heavily regulate the deployment of these vehicles, and should incorporate them into existing public transportation networks if they think they should exist at all.

The government shouldn’t regulate development but they should regulate deployment until there are no errors.

No autonomous vehicles should not be allowed on public roads until their AI and associated technology are proven to work 100% of the time, including never putting any human in damger

No, but access and transparency to prevent fraud or safety violations. Not telling them what to do, but if they find an issue they can’t hide it.

Yes, governments should regulate the development and deployment of autonomous vehicles (AVs). A balanced regulatory framework is considered essential by industry players, public interest groups, and policymakers. While some argue against regulation to foster innovation, the potential for catastrophic failure, ethical dilemmas, and a fractured legal landscape creates a strong argument for governmental oversight.
Arguments for government regulation
Public safety: AVs have the potential to reduce road fatalities, but initial testing and deployment pose significant safety risks. A hands-off regu…  Read morelatory approach has been criticized for allowing dangerous public road experimentation. Government oversight can establish mandatory safety standards and a structured framework for certification and testing.
Liability and accountability: In an accident involving an AV, assigning liability is complex, involving vehicle manufacturers, software developers, owners, and operators. Clear federal rules are needed to determine liability for a defective system, reducing the burden on individuals to prove a technical failure.
National framework and innovation: The lack of comprehensive federal regulation has led to a "patchwork problem" of inconsistent state laws. A federal framework would provide regulatory certainty and clarity for companies, promoting innovation and investment across the industry. Many AV manufacturers themselves are calling for a national policy to avoid this uncertainty.
Addressing ethical dilemmas: AVs will be forced to make split-second ethical decisions in unavoidable accident scenarios. Regulations can establish guiding principles for these decisions, such as prioritizing the preservation of human life and ensuring choices are not based on personal characteristics.
Consumer privacy and security: AVs collect and process vast amounts of data, raising serious concerns about data privacy and cybersecurity. Mandatory standards for data collection, usage, and strong cybersecurity protections are necessary to p

Yes, regulation should be implemented based on accidents like in aviation, rail, and non-autonomous automobile accidents

Yes, the technology for self-driving vehicles is still new and we should make sure the vehicles are completely safe to be on our roads.

The government should strongly promote the development and deployment of autonomous vehicles, including by preempting local regulatory barriers.

I believe companies should have to follow strict guidelines when it comes to the deployment/development of autonomous vehicles to ensure the safety of citizens.

I do think yes if they can find a very efficient way because Telsa have a self driving mode but it has not worked 100% some of the times

autonomous vehicles are a dumb idea, it's just public transport but without actually removing the problem of cars

We should focus on bettering current vehicles and regulating them so that they meet greener and safer standards.

Autonomous vehicles are a dangerous idea when it comes to human safety and human control and should not be manufactured

Not at this time, but the government should do so in the future once they become available to a wider set of consumers

YES... The development and deployment of autonomous vehicles must be regulated under a morally grounded, epistemically sound, systemically coherent framework that integrates ethical, spiritual, practical, and interdisciplinary rigor. To abstain from regulation is to abdicate responsibility for life, dignity, and justice in the public square. Regulation should not hinder innovation, but elevate it under the discipline of moral excellence and human-centered design.

YES... the government should regulate the development and deployment of autonomous vehicles to ensure safety, accountability, equity, and ethical integration into public infrastructure.

Yes, but mostly to help autonomous vehicle companies coordinate, with some common sense safety testing

They should create regulations to subsidize further interest rates on the fluctuation and interest of the economy wether poor or rich to deploy the autonomous vehicles.

The government should only impose regulations to prevent large corporations from engaging in unfair practices.

Why is it even a thing? It's already proven to be too dangerous. Until the technology improves, they should be removed from the market.

The government should regulate the deployment to prevent civilians using autonomous vehicles to get to areas without having to drive or operate a vehicle, potentially lowering fatal crashes due to things like paying attention to your phone instead of the road.

Only by setting clear, standardized criteria—defining what capabilities are required for each autonomy level (e.g., Level 2, Level 3)—to ensure consistency and public understanding.

No; I don't trust the government to be fast, efficient, or competent enough at making policies regarding autonomous vehicles for it to govern them.

No, not federally, at least. The states should ensure safety standards while companies have the responsibility to keep the technology from going haywire.

Yes, our roads are funded by the government so it should make sure that they are safe for the public.

The car should be approved by the government or car companies or whoever is in charge to do all that.

Yes, any modern technology that is new to society should be watched closely in order to find and faults in the technology and improve it.

Yes and we shouldn't see an auto drive vehicle till they can be proven beyond reasonable doubt that they are safe

I think the self-driving cars should be regulated by the government, but with the goal of providing the cars to those who will benefit from them, such as people with disabilities who may not be able to drive themselves. But I don't think the cars should be deployed to the general public by the government

I believe that 'car collecting' and other such things need to be stopped with regulation. I think more than 2, maybe 3, cars per household is an absurd amount to have. Vehicles should be used for travel and function, not as collectibles. However, I also think that anyone who wants to have a car should not be forbidden from it as long as they have a valid license.

Yes, registered owners should assume all legal liability in the event that their autonomous vehicle is at fault in a collision.

we should not develop autonomous vehicles at all, they are highly dangerous and would be irrelevant with better public infrastructure

No, because a lot can go bad with self-driving cars just as much or probably more than people driving on their own.

No, for the sake of freedom, capitalism, weak government, checks and balances, and federalism, leave it up to private companies.

The government should make sure autonomous vehicles adhere to high safety standards, but the government should not aid in the coding process of autonomous vehicles.

No, the development of autonomous vehicles should not be regulated but the deployment of these vehicles should only be after extensive safety tests

We should not have autonomous vehicles in the first place - our city roads are congested enough already.

Yes, government regulation is crucial for the safe and responsible development and deployment of autonomous vehicles, addressing safety, liability, and public acceptance, while also fostering innovation and ensuring a consistent regulatory framework across states.
Here's a more detailed explanation:
Why Regulation is Necessary:
Safety:
Autonomous vehicles (AVs) are complex systems, and ensuring their safe operation is paramount. Regulations can establish safety standards for AV technology, testing procedures, and operational conditions.
Liability:
Determining who is liable in the event…  Read more of an accident involving an AV is a complex issue. Regulations can clarify liability, whether it falls on the manufacturer, the owner, or the AV itself.
Public Acceptance:
Public trust and acceptance of AVs are crucial for their widespread adoption. Regulations can demonstrate a commitment to safety and accountability, building confidence in the technology.
Innovation:
While regulation can seem restrictive, a clear and consistent regulatory framework can actually foster innovation by providing certainty for developers and investors.
Consistency:
The current patchwork of state regulations creates confusion and uncertainty for AV manufacturers. A federal framework can ensure a more consistent and efficient approach to AV development and deployment.
Cybersecurity and Data Privacy:
AVs are highly connected and rely on complex software and data. Regulations can address cybersecurity risks, data privacy concerns, and the potential for hacking or misuse.
Ethical Considerations:
Regulations can address ethical considerations, such as how AVs should make decisions in difficult situations, and ensure that the technology is used responsibly and equitably.
Examples of Regulatory Needs:
Safety Performance Standards:
Regulations could require AVs to meet specific safety performance standards, such as the ability to avoid collisions in various scenarios.
Testing and Certification:
Clear procedures for testing and cer

I dont think it is bad if we have self driving cars but it cant be the only ones because then something could happen.

States should be allowed to regulate the deployment, but not the development of autonomous vehicles.

Depends on who our government is. Under the current Elon Musk rule, it is too biased to fairly answer.

This Question doesn't really apply to me, but a beilive all cars should be tested to make sure they are safe for human use.

Yes, because the government is community and so long as those autonomous vehicles are owned by private individuals, because they will be used on public roads built by the community, which is the government, then yes, the people/community/government should have a say so over what can and cannot be on those roads. Using a humanist ideology.

I see that it could benefit some people maybe elders but mainly I’m against self driving cars. If there was a malfunction that caused an accident then there world be no one to take responsibility

autonomous vehicles should not be allowed, it makes the driver unreliable, even with standards people always try to by pass.

Yes, but only until these vehicles can be trusted to not randomly stop in traffic, or trusted to stop when pedestrians or animals cross their paths.

No, we should leave that to the humans, we should use the roundabouts even though people hate them. We don’t need cameras at every intersection, they wouldn’t have an excuse. It saves time, money, and is more safe. Win win win

I think local jurisdictions have the right to regulate how these vehicles are used in their areas. Regular oversight of safety standards for any vehicle should be enough regulation at the govt level.

No, but there needs to be oversight as to whether they are safe and working properly for everyones safety.

Someone brought up the idea of picking one thing or the other. Would you rather have a person on their phone while driving their car or would you rather have an autonomous vehicle drive around.

Yes because AI could drive a truck for example and that needs to be regulated especially to prevent car wrecks or any other issues that are not aided by humans.

Yes, and they should not be on the roads until more work has been done to guarantee the safety of these vehicles.

No, stop the development and deployment of autonomous vehicles and expand and fund various forms of public transportation, including high-speed rail, instead

Yes, but only in the case of maintaining safety for the people and infrastructure that the vehicles interact with.

No, and we should ban the sale, development, and deployment of autonomous (self driving) vehicles, because it would cause more traffic problems, accidents, and catastrophe.

Yes, it should be regulated until the technology cannot have errors, cannot be hacked, and is improved

I mean they can, its the drivers fault if they don't pay attention to where their vehicle is driving to.

No, the current technology that exists is filled with bugs already. Every Tesla car has been recalled. The software necessary does not exist yet and technology can be more stupid than people sometimes— it just takes one processing error for the whole system to crash.

Yes, fund and expand various forms of public transportation, including high-speed rail, as opposed to developing and deploying autonomous vehicles

No, because it is HIGHLY dangerous for a person to rely on a piece of technology on the road. We are not that advanced and can still have technology failures, malfunctions, etc. For example, if you're stuck in traffic and come close to a car accident or get in a car accident, you are 100% relying on that vehicle and can risk losing not only your life but the other drivers as well.

I'd think it's important to set a limit of the amount of money being spent to make a car should be met, but it should be allowed to go over the limit if it's to advance the vehicles for better protection for the driver and passengers only

No, they should ban 100% autonomous vehicles as long as there are human-controlled vehicles on the road

Yes, to ensure safety and compliance meets public standards, but not stifle or affect innovation or progress

Only if the dept head is of Trump/Musk thinking. Do NOT let this up for governments to decide in the future.

Yes, and fund and expand various forms of public transportation, including high-speed rail, as opposed to developing and deploying autonomous vehicles

No, this should be in the hands of private corporations to develop freely - however there should be strict guidelines and requirements relating to autonomous vehicles and testing before they are authorized on public roads

Yes, for safety reasons, but should ultimately put their focus on public transportation infrastructure

Yes, but only once it reaches a national level and affects a normalized portion of society as a whole.

All new vehicles should be required to have an ID transponder to facilitate growth in the autonomous industry.

They should invest some time and money into it, but if people want to drive their own selves they should be able to, (unless we reach a point where there are little to no accidents with autonomus vehicles, then I would say we all should be required to use that instead- and IF it does get to that point, I would NOT support it only if whoever was in charge of it drove up the prices a lot, knowing that it was everyone's only option to get around).

Yes but not to the point to where they control it. They should just work closely with the maker of the vehicles

Cars should not be autonomous. a driver is behind the wheel and if the driver is not following the law, they should be prosecuted

At this point in time, no, but some standards need to be made, but this is not a question for a local or single country government as car manufacturers are global producers.