This policy, often referred to as "Remain in Mexico," requires asylum seekers to stay in Mexico while U.S. immigration courts review their claims. It aims to manage the flow of asylum cases and reduce pressure on U.S. facilities. Proponents argue that it prevents overcrowding in U.S. detention centers, deters frivolous claims, and ensures an orderly asylum process. Opponents argue that it places vulnerable individuals in dangerous conditions, denies them adequate legal support, and violates international asylum protections.
Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
State Senate District:
City:
Assembly District:
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
@B2LXPVXIndependent1yr1Y
Imagine you had a organized crime family who wanted to cause harm to you and your family because you didn't want to pay them and the only way was for you to leave your home and family that you've built just to come to a country where you are persecuted and belittled because you didn't have the time to go through the complex legal process to come to the country legally.
@B6PSP53Republican10mos10MO
An asylum seeker from Mexico shouldn't be allowed to have the same access to healthcare as an American citizen. This is due to how the asylum seeker isn't worthy of American healthcare until they are a citizen of the United States, because this right is not yet granted to them as they are not an American citizen. This in turn requires for asylum seekers to become American citizens so that may benefit from the same aids of American citizens.
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
@B6PSP53Republican10mos10MO
Asylum seekers should not be able to benefit from American led programs until they become United States citizens. Them benefiting from American programs creates inequality between citizens of America and asylum seekers, as there is no point to being an American citizen if someone outside the country is able to access the same benefits as an American citizen without any credentials.
@B2KL8LV1yr1Y
@B5DHVJPRepublican1yr1Y
@B46VKHT1yr1Y
This presumed a racial profile claiming that asylum seekers are only regard to Mexico rather than the whole support status. I think in general they should wait status for approval in the current country they are in depending on the circumstances like a dictorial government like a corruption of power like Haiti, North Korea and others alike. If requiring the fleeing from one home country to find another of peace and livilyhood. It should be understood that proper measures are put in place but also audited to all accounts like a Government agency meaning to be audited as well.
@B2KPKM31yr1Y
@BDW86BV2wks2W
@BDTCBVF2wks2W
@BBRDTVP3mos3MO
@BBH74WB4mos4MO
@B8P5M7C7mos7MO
@B88N5DY7mos7MO
@B3ZX2P21yr1Y
@B2KC7T8 1yr1Y
@BDXT4YC6 days6D
@BDXDLMC1wk1W
@9RMN4JW 1wk1W
No, but establish secure, well-resourced processing hubs within the U.S. or in southern Mexico to protect migrants from cartel violence. Also, utilize alternatives to detention, such as electronic monitoring or community-based oversight, allowing migrants to live safely in the U.S. while awaiting their court dates.
@BDWMRP5 1wk1W
@6W6M7XDConstitution 2wks2W
@BDWCDDH2wks2W
@BDVZLXC2wks2W
@BD858Q31mo1MO
@BD8387F 1mo1MO
@BD7QR961mo1MO
@BD7KDZT1mo1MO
@BD5BS9R1mo1MO
@BD6FH9RAmerican Solidarity2mos2MO
@BD62VLQ2mos2MO
@BD5TZ8V2mos2MO
@BD5RXK92mos2MO
@BD5HLFX2mos2MO
@BD33RY4Constitution2mos2MO
@BD33RJ92mos2MO
@BD32CYV2mos2MO
@Mosby-Politics 2mos2MO
@BD29KRSLibertarian2mos2MO
@BCZYXHF2mos2MO
@BCZFLDRIndependent2mos2MO
@BCYVKLR2mos2MO
@BCYQZLR2mos2MO
@BCYDSRD2mos2MO
@BCY4DPS2mos2MO
@BCY44G22mos2MO
@BCXSB242mos2MO
@BCXCMX82mos2MO
@BCX2F8VIndependent2mos2MO
@BCWTYPB2mos2MO
@BCWS7YC2mos2MO
@BCW8F75Independent2mos2MO
@BCW87XVRepublican2mos2MO
@BCW6F6B2mos2MO
@BCVLRNB 2mos2MO
@BCV37CP2mos2MO
@BCV33Y42mos2MO
@BCTTHG22mos2MO
@BCTSZZCRepublican 2mos2MO
@BCT2T732mos2MO
@BCSX7QR2mos2MO
@BCSTCGJ2mos2MO
@BCS53RXConstitution2mos2MO
@BCRQWG52mos2MO
@BCRD9FV2mos2MO
@BCR5B6V2mos2MO
@BCQYR4F2mos2MO
@BCQF8V72mos2MO
@BCHQ6JR 2mos2MO
@BCPQ9S2 2mos2MO
@BCPL2N3 2mos2MO
@BCPL2N3 2mos2MO
@BCPL3862mos2MO
No they should held in not a prison but like a temporary shelter they can't leave until they are processed but it has good quality of life like good hot food comfy beds nice guards and immagrents children will temporarily be placed in foster homes while their parents are being prosessed and make trials speedy so they only have to spend 3 days-a week in a facility
@BCNPQVJ2mos2MO
@BCNFKJC2mos2MO
@BCNBB4J2mos2MO
@BCMMYB92mos2MO
@BCMDKKN2mos2MO
@BCM5WZKIndependent2mos2MO
@BCKXG8P2mos2MO
It depends on the severity of the case. If the person really needs to get to America to seek asylum the court case should be moved up and be done as quickly as possible. If the person is in immediate danger by remaining in Mexico, they should be allowed into America but be limited on where they can go and what they do until the case has been processed.
@BCKRGPR2mos2MO
@BCKRFHBRepublican2mos2MO
@BCHBSB3Republican3mos3MO
@BCCYX9D3mos3MO
@BCCFWWN3mos3MO
Deleted3mos3MO
No, this can lead to biometric tracking and digital IDs at borders which can lead to a global surveillance state, and abolish ICE, the welfare state, and military industrial complex interventionist wars overseas like the Mexican Drug War and Operation Fast and Furious incentivizing asylum seekers, and let state and local governments handle asylum seeker cases with due process.
@BCB7GGKIndependent3mos3MO
@BC92KWZ3mos3MO
@BC8QJC83mos3MO
@BC88YQG3mos3MO
@BC7GP5G3mos3MO
The assumption that all immigrants are from Mexico is in itself problematic. Immigrants seeking asylum, regardless of their country of origin, should receive a uniform process of treatment and consideration for the circumstances surrounding their request for asylum. Due process should be applied to determine impacts of safety and other factors pertaining to their case and how our government should best respond.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
