Try the political quiz
+

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

261 Replies

 @B2KP3YC from Florida  answered…1yr1Y

Only the ones who didn't cause harm to law enforcement/other officials, and the ones who didn't cause over 1000$ in property damage.

  @JaxSocialist  from Florida  answered…1yr1Y

They should re-evaluated. If what they did during the riot wasn't violent, then yes. I also think every prisoner should be re-evaluated if they didn't commit a violent crime.

 @B8KVD8FRepublican from Florida  answered…7mos7MO

No, for people who attacked law enforcement and vandalized property. Those who walked into the capital without participating for criminal activity, should be granted Presidential pardons.

 @B2KRLYB from Florida  answered…1yr1Y

They felt their rights were not protected. Perhaps the right to a fair vote. It’s their civic duty to overthrow a government that way. Yet due to this 2 party system, that will never happen.

 @B7MSFJ3 from Florida  answered…8mos8MO

No they really shouldn't get pardoned because they stormed a government building which is technically domestic terrorism

 @B79HP7Q from Florida  answered…9mos9MO

No, because that is not how the justice system should work. If you are convicted of a crime and found guilty, then you should not be able to receive a presidential pardon

 @B6J285B from Florida  answered…10mos10MO

Yes, only to the non-violent people led in by police should be pardoned while the violent people charged.

 @B5X7XWR from Florida  answered…12mos12MO

That is the President's decision, but personally, I do not think they deserve to be pardoned. I think they are convicted terrorists who deserve to be punished.

 @B5DT9MKIndependent from Florida  answered…1yr1Y

No, but I also respect the executive branch's right to provide such pardons and do not think that power should be limited

 @B5DN8N5 from Florida  answered…1yr1Y

No, I don't believe they should, but I respect that the executive branch has precedent over such decisions

 @B4Z8WVS from Florida  answered…1yr1Y

I think that the January 6th attack was blown out of proportion. It was not an insurrection like the democrats said. Be that as it may: many of them were in a place where they shouldn't have been, and they did rush the capital building, and they should be held accountable in some way.

 @B8NM6YF from Florida  answered…7mos7MO

this question seems too vague. I think the President should be able to pardon anybody that the constitution gives them power to pardon.

 @B8N4ZL2Republican from Florida  answered…7mos7MO

No all of their false convictions need to be overturned this was an act of political warfare against American citizens

 @B6RYK9L from Florida  answered…10mos10MO

Presidential pardons are a power of the chief executive under the U.S. Constitution (Art. II, § 2, Cl.1). Whether or not anyone be granted one is at the discretion of the sitting POTUS.

 @B35KTV9 from Florida  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, as in the Declaration of Independence "it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security" if these people believed what they were doing is right, they should receive a pardon.

 @B329NTB from Florida  answered…1yr1Y

Most, but not people who assaulted police officers, entered the chambers, and ones who threatend lawmakers

 @B2S7GTC from Florida  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, high levels of undercover government agents escalated and actively participated in the events of January 6th.

 @B2QWFLD from Florida  answered…1yr1Y

Only to those who peacefully protested and did not assault Capitol Police Officers. To those that physically assaulted police officers, they don't deserve pardon.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...