Using the argument that "the government should not fund programs to provide basic human rights because it incentivizes a reliance on the government and results in less work" is one tattered with immoralism. We, the people, should be guaranteed the very basics of what we consider human rights, such as food, water, housing, and whatnot. Providing such things will only incentivize people to pursue their dreams and aspirations, for a system which they don't have to work dead-end jobs to have a basic life only crushing pushes for innovation and aspirations. Sure, it could perhaps result in less work in positions from people who simply work there for the money, but they'll be replaced by confident workers whom have aspirations in the, potentially, the cooking industry, or the mechanical industry, who'll worker harder for better pay. It's simply ensuring those who want to work can work in the industry they enjoy.