By definition only criminals would have guns, citizens would not be able to defend themselves from criminals or the government.

This is, however, against the 2nd Amendment. People are legally allowed to own guns. It is understandable why someone would think this, but people need to defend themselves in case of an emergency. Instead, there could be restrictions on who can own a gun. For example, the government may not allow people convicted with a felony to own one. But overall, people that know how to be responsible should be able to own a gun, meaning gun control should not be raised significantly.

Gun control should be increased as gun violence is a major concern, with guns being used for violence and killing innocent people instead of for protection.

Gun violence is still gonna be an issue regardless of wether the government raise the laws of gun restrictions or not.

It would restrictions on guns will prevent less tragedies.And because it will be banned it will help identify those who are getting guns illegally and bringing it in illegally and face consequences

I disagree. There can be many illegal ways of getting guns to use for wrong reasons and stricter rules or any sort of gun control will not be able to stop that. For example drugs have been illegal for a very long time now but people still get them illegally and the rate of drug overdose is very high especially in the US.

Agreed. Stricter gun control, combined with limiting civilian access to high-powered weaponry, has been shown to reduce gun violence because it decreases the availability of firearms to those most likely to misuse them, while ensuring that the government retains the tools necessary for public safety.

the country would be dangerous due to the fact t that there's too many immature irresponsible person to carry a gun around