Try the political quiz
@B98J7NX DisagreementsCounter Arguments5mos ago

I don't believe foreigners should have the right to vote unless they became a full citizen of the United States

Voting for our future leaders should be reserved for Americans, this is our country and outside views should not skew the wishes of citizens. Another problem is that political parties can use this their advantage. By allowing illegal immigrants to vote, a party can simply win for allowing illegal immigrants to stay in our country. That in my opinion is a false election and is a cheap thing to do. I have nothing against foreigners, but their political choices need to be relative to their own country, if they decide to become a citizen, then by all means they should have the right to vote. Legal immigration is a very different story than allowing illegal immigrants to become a part of our nation without proper authentication and paperwork.

+
Expand

Knowledge quiz

How much do you know about Elections?

See if you know more than the average American.

Test your knowledge!

Knowledge quiz

How much do you know about Counter Argument?

See if you know more than the average American.

Test your knowledge!

Reply

 @B98LWVBNo Labels from Virginia  agreed…5mos5MO

I agree with this statement. If your not legally a part of the United States, how should you be able to vote? In my opinion, a foreignor needs to become a citizen before voting.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...

About this author

Learn more about the author that submitted this disagreement.

@B98J7NX

Last activeActivity6 discussionsInfluence1 engagementsEngagement bias100%Audience bias52%Active in
Answers  2 the Economy  1 Disagreements  1 Education  1 CEO Pay Cap  1
PartyUndeclaredLocationUnknown

More conversations

Join in on more popular conversations.

 @VOTA submitted…2yrs2Y

Trump's Deportation Storm: America Braces for Mass Exodus of Immigrants

For months, immigration advocates have been planning for the possibility of Donald Trump’s return to the White House. Now, their worst fears have arrived.Immigrants’ rights groups have spent the last year preparing for a second Trump term and an overhaul of the nation’s immigration system, analyzing Trump’s proposals, drafting legal briefs, coordinating messaging and organizing aid for immigrants and asylum seekers. They responded to Trump’s victory with alarm and vowed to put up a fight, setting the stage for four more years of contentious court battles with his administration.Some are already preparing to push current leadership at the Department of Homeland Security to take steps to stymie the incoming Trump team, particularly on immigrant detention and the use of AI in enforcement.“We should expect to see the devastation of immigrant communities all over the country. We should expect to see family separation,” said Kica Matos, the president of the National Immigration Law Center. “It is entirely possible that he will try to use the military to carry out deportations, so that means that Americans all over the country will see the military engaging in enforcement against civilian populations, which is horrifying.”Trump, after winning a historic victory on a platform of turbo-charged immigration enforcement, has said he will conduct mass deportations at a scale never before seen. Immigrant advocates have warned this would be expensive and inhumane, separating families and wrecking communities. The president-elect has also vowed to build huge detention camps, hire thousands more border agents, funnel military spending toward border security and invoke the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to expel suspected members of drug cartels and criminal gangs without court hearings.He has also said he would end “catch-and-release” — allowing migrants to remain free, often with monitoring, while they await immigration court hearings — and restore a policy from his first term requiring asylum seekers to remain in Mexico while their cases are processed. And he has dodged questions about whether he would try to bring back family separation.

▲  4333 replies