Try the political quiz
@ISIDEWITHQuestionsTransportationStates: New JerseyStarted 3mos agoActive 3wks ago

Should New Jersey drivers be allowed to pump their own gas?

New Jersey is the only state in the U.S. that completely bans self-service gas stations, a policy dating back to the 1949 Retail Gasoline Dispensing Safety Act. For decades, "Jersey Girls Don't Pump Gas" has been a cultural point of pride, with residents enjoying the luxury of staying in their warm cars during winter while attendants fill the tank. Proponents of lifting the ban argue it would lower gas prices by removing labor costs and speed up fueling for impatient drivers. Opponents argue it kills jobs, poses safety risks from untrained handlers, and removes a beloved convenience that defines the Jersey driving experience.

+
Expand

Knowledge quiz

How much do you know about Transportation?

See if you know more than the average American.

Test your knowledge!

15 Replies

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...3mos3MO

Yes

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...3mos3MO

No

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...3mos3MO

No, Jersey Girls don't pump gas.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...3mos3MO

No, it protects thousands of jobs for gas station attendants.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...3mos3MO

Yes, it would lower gas prices and reduce wait times.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...3mos3MO

Yes, but mandate full-service lanes for seniors and the disabled.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...3mos3MO

No, trained attendants ensure safety and keep insurance costs low.

 @BDSC4X5 from New Jersey  answered…3wks3W

I don't really care about this

 @BDPR4W7 from New Jersey  answered…4wks4W

They should have the option to pump their own gas but also have gas station attendants there for people who don't.

 @BDPCTCV from New Jersey  answered…4wks4W

Yes, so we can get Buc-ee's.

 @BDKF3K3 from New Jersey  answered…1mo1MO

It should be personal choice

 @BDC5G28 from New Jersey  answered…1mo1MO

I live in ohio

 @BD5HLFX from New Jersey  answered…2mos2MO

Yes, but it’s optional for them.

 @BD3Z2QS from New Jersey  answered…2mos2MO

yes, but it should cost more

 @BCWR5MWIndependent from New Jersey  answered…2mos2MO

Yes, but not required.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...

More conversations

Join in on more popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…2yrs2Y

Israeli Bombings Kill 2,300 In Lebanon in 3 weeks

Lebanese authorities say Israeli bombing has killed more than 2,300 people and injured almost 11,000, mostly in the past three weeks, with Israeli attacks reaching areas far beyond Hizbollah’s traditional bastions of support in the south.The Israeli military has ordered people living in more than a quarter of Lebanon to flee, according to a UN calculation, as its fight with the Iran-backed Shia militant group Hizbollah threatens to engulf the Mediterranean country.Lebanese authorities say Israeli bombing has killed more than 2,300 people and injured almost 11,000, mostly in the past three weeks, with Israeli attacks reaching areas far beyond Hizbollah’s traditional bastions of support in the south.More than 1mn people have fled their homes in Lebanon in under a month, according to its government, a dramatic forced movement of the population in a country of only about 5mn inhabitants with a land mass smaller than the US state of Connecticut. Israeli forces began a ground offensive in south Lebanon two weeks ago, in their fourth invasion of the country in under five decades. They had already destroyed large parts of the densely populated southern Beirut suburb where Hizbollah had its headquarters, and killed many top militant commanders in air strikes, including former leader Hassan Nasrallah.Rema Jamous Imseis, Middle East director of UNHCR, told journalists in Geneva that “over 25 per cent of [Lebanon is] under a direct Israeli military evacuation order”. “People are heeding these calls to evacuate and they’re fleeing with almost nothing,” she added, saying that 80 per cent of the shelters opened by the Lebanese government — mostly in schools — were now full.

▲  1012 replies

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…2yrs2Y

A Moment of Darkness': Washington Post's No-Endorsement Decision Ignites Media Firestorm

Even though the presidential race between former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris is neck and neck, The Washington Post has decided not to make a presidential endorsement for the first time in 36 years, the publisher and CEO announced Friday."We are returning to our roots of not endorsing presidential candidates," Will Lewis wrote in an opinion piece published on the paper's website. He referenced the paper's policy in the decades prior to 1976, when, following the Watergate scandal that the Post broke, it endorsed Democratic nominee Jimmy Carter. The last time the Post did not endorse a presidential candidate in the general election was 1988, according to a search of its archives.Colleagues learned the news from the editorial page editor, David Shipley, at a tense meeting shortly before Lewis' announcement. The meeting was characterized by someone with direct knowledge of discussions on condition of anonymity to speak about internal matters.Shipley said that he told other editorial board leaders Thursday by management that there would be no endorsement, though he has known for weeks. He added that he "owns" this decision. The reason he cited was to create "independent space" where the newspaper does not tell people for whom to vote.Colleagues were said to be "shocked" and uniformly negative. Post corporate spokespeople have not responded to multiple messages left by NPR on the subject.Former Washington Post Executive Editor Martin Baron, who led the newsroom to acclaim during Trump's presidency, denounced the decision starkly."This is cowardice, a moment of darkness that will leave democracy as a casualty," Baron said in a statement to NPR. "Donald Trump will celebrate this as an invitation to further intimidate The Post’s owner, Jeff Bezos (and other media owners). History will mark a disturbing chapter of spinelessness at an institution famed for courage."A similar decision by Los Angeles Times owner Patrick Soon-Shiong led this week to the resignations of the paper's editorials editor and two editorial board members. Soon-Shiong said that he had asked the editorial board to draft a "factual analysis" of Trump and Harris' policies and plans. In her resignation letter, editorials editor Mariel Garza said the decision made the paper look “craven and hypocritical,” given its past reporting and editorials on Trump.

▲  1013 replies