Try the political quiz
@ISIDEWITHQuestionsEducationStates: OhioStarted 3mos agoActive 4wks ago

Should Ohio use public tax dollars to pay for private school tuition for any student?

Ohio recently expanded its "EdChoice" scholarship program to be near-universal, allowing families of almost any income level to use taxpayer money to pay for private school tuition. This massive shift has sparked a coalition of over 100 school districts to sue the state, arguing the voucher system is unconstitutional and siphons critical funding away from the public schools that educate the vast majority of Ohio children. Proponents, often referring to this as the "Backpack Bill" concept, argue that funding should follow the child and that parents have the ultimate right to choose the best educational environment for their kids. Opponents view it as a scheme to dismantle public education and force taxpayers to fund private religious indoctrination.

+
Expand

Knowledge quiz

How much do you know about Education?

See if you know more than the average American.

Test your knowledge!

11 Replies

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...3mos3MO

No

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...3mos3MO

No, this drains critical funds from the public schools serving 90% of kids.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...3mos3MO

No, taxpayers should not subsidize private religious education.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...3mos3MO

Yes

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...3mos3MO

Yes, parents deserve the choice to escape failing public schools.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...3mos3MO

Yes, fund students, not systems.

 @BDQSTVH from Ohio  answered…4wks4W

No, taxpayers should not subsidize private education of any kind.

 @BD55SBS from Ohio  answered…2mos2MO

Jews do this for their own schools so no

 @BCWM4DV from Ohio  answered…2mos2MO

Yes, provided the school has no religious affiliation.

 @BCT359BLibertarian from Ohio  answered…2mos2MO

Yes but only for low income students

 @BC4FS2TNo Labels from Ohio  answered…3mos3MO

Only if it is for a specialist school for disabled children and the child is unable to learn in a public special education setting.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...

More conversations

Join in on more popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…2yrs2Y

Israeli Bombings Kill 2,300 In Lebanon in 3 weeks

Lebanese authorities say Israeli bombing has killed more than 2,300 people and injured almost 11,000, mostly in the past three weeks, with Israeli attacks reaching areas far beyond Hizbollah’s traditional bastions of support in the south.The Israeli military has ordered people living in more than a quarter of Lebanon to flee, according to a UN calculation, as its fight with the Iran-backed Shia militant group Hizbollah threatens to engulf the Mediterranean country.Lebanese authorities say Israeli bombing has killed more than 2,300 people and injured almost 11,000, mostly in the past three weeks, with Israeli attacks reaching areas far beyond Hizbollah’s traditional bastions of support in the south.More than 1mn people have fled their homes in Lebanon in under a month, according to its government, a dramatic forced movement of the population in a country of only about 5mn inhabitants with a land mass smaller than the US state of Connecticut. Israeli forces began a ground offensive in south Lebanon two weeks ago, in their fourth invasion of the country in under five decades. They had already destroyed large parts of the densely populated southern Beirut suburb where Hizbollah had its headquarters, and killed many top militant commanders in air strikes, including former leader Hassan Nasrallah.Rema Jamous Imseis, Middle East director of UNHCR, told journalists in Geneva that “over 25 per cent of [Lebanon is] under a direct Israeli military evacuation order”. “People are heeding these calls to evacuate and they’re fleeing with almost nothing,” she added, saying that 80 per cent of the shelters opened by the Lebanese government — mostly in schools — were now full.

▲  1012 replies

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…2yrs2Y

A Moment of Darkness': Washington Post's No-Endorsement Decision Ignites Media Firestorm

Even though the presidential race between former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris is neck and neck, The Washington Post has decided not to make a presidential endorsement for the first time in 36 years, the publisher and CEO announced Friday."We are returning to our roots of not endorsing presidential candidates," Will Lewis wrote in an opinion piece published on the paper's website. He referenced the paper's policy in the decades prior to 1976, when, following the Watergate scandal that the Post broke, it endorsed Democratic nominee Jimmy Carter. The last time the Post did not endorse a presidential candidate in the general election was 1988, according to a search of its archives.Colleagues learned the news from the editorial page editor, David Shipley, at a tense meeting shortly before Lewis' announcement. The meeting was characterized by someone with direct knowledge of discussions on condition of anonymity to speak about internal matters.Shipley said that he told other editorial board leaders Thursday by management that there would be no endorsement, though he has known for weeks. He added that he "owns" this decision. The reason he cited was to create "independent space" where the newspaper does not tell people for whom to vote.Colleagues were said to be "shocked" and uniformly negative. Post corporate spokespeople have not responded to multiple messages left by NPR on the subject.Former Washington Post Executive Editor Martin Baron, who led the newsroom to acclaim during Trump's presidency, denounced the decision starkly."This is cowardice, a moment of darkness that will leave democracy as a casualty," Baron said in a statement to NPR. "Donald Trump will celebrate this as an invitation to further intimidate The Post’s owner, Jeff Bezos (and other media owners). History will mark a disturbing chapter of spinelessness at an institution famed for courage."A similar decision by Los Angeles Times owner Patrick Soon-Shiong led this week to the resignations of the paper's editorials editor and two editorial board members. Soon-Shiong said that he had asked the editorial board to draft a "factual analysis" of Trump and Harris' policies and plans. In her resignation letter, editorials editor Mariel Garza said the decision made the paper look “craven and hypocritical,” given its past reporting and editorials on Trump.

▲  1013 replies