No, and each state should decide their own level of coverage

I disagree that state should cover their coverage of Medicaid. Medicaid should be handled as a federal problem. For example in states that feel more opposed to Medicaid this harms anyone who needs the benefit.

I disagree that state should cover their coverage of Medicaid. Medicaid should be handled as a federal problem. For example in states that feel more opposed to Medicaid this harms anyone who needs the benefit.

non-expansion states would not only help prevent coverage loss for low-income parents, young adults, and postpartum people during the unwinding, they could also increase overall access to health coverage

i think theres no way to compensate for the different levels of income throughout a state and make it fair for everyone this will also skew state populations as people wil move to the states that most benefit them

State governments often do not represent the majority of people located within their state due to gerrymandering.

Federal rules require state Medicaid programs to cover certain “mandatory” services, such as hospital and physician care, laboratory and X-ray services, home health services, and nursing facility services for adults.

I think that there are some states with people who don't need to increase funding on medicaid. There is just not as much use for it, and it increases their taxes. However, some states have a greater need for medicaid, and those states can determine how much funding they want to have for medicaid.