Do you support the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Obamacare)?

No, government sponsored health care should be handled by state governments

Yes, but the law should be amended to include better consumer bargaining rights for negotiating prices and to include better access to preventative and holistic care.

No, it increased premiums and reduced competition.

Yes, but we need to put physicians back in control of hospitals and reduce the non-healthcare provider administrative bloat. Or we just move to a single-payer system, at least in the state of NJ.

No, and we should implement an optional single payer system and later transition to a mandatory single payer system after slowly abolishing private insurance.

Yes, but we need to transition to market solutions where cost available to patients, patients save for there healthcare, and where patients get to choose among options and keep the funds that they save and roll over into retirement accounts to incentivize thrift.

No, I would support abolishing Obamacare in favor of a single payer universal health care system. Obamacare is widely ineffective.

It should be limited to a 3-5 use and then you are off. It is not meant to live on the system forever. It is just to get you on your feet and move along

No, it is a handout to insurance companies that raised rates for many. Abolish insurance and institute single payer.

Medicare, insurance, Obamacare, all of it inflates false prices. The system needs a whole rewrite. Long lines don’t serve the American people and neither do long bills.

Yes, let citizens have the coverage and rates available to them as federal politicians have available to them. The coverage and prices under the so called Affordable Care act are second rate.

The government should stop propping up the insurance industry. Switch to a dual system where both public and private medical care is available.

Yes, some aspects were beneficial. There should be the ability for all income levels to get individual insurance coverage outside of their employment at a reasonable cost.

I do support healthcare protection as healthcare prices can get crazy expensive in America. However, I know close to nothing about this act as I have not looked in to it myself so I do not believe my opinion would be valid/credible.

Need to take the good portions of coverage from Obamacare and make it more fair for all Americans and decrease costs over time

No, we should have a single payer system so that it's directly taken out at a percentage of income so that everyone has affordable healthcare

Health care is too expensive in this country. Obamacare is clearly not the solution. The middle class is drowning.

If this was real health care i am for it. IT IS A TAX< IT IS A TAX. 2 huge problems with it. 1. you have to pay the first$2500 in medical bills. People that need this health care cannot afford that. 2. People lie about their income to get a bigger subsidy so there premiums are lower. When they do their taxes, they get a penalty and have to pay it back but why does it go to the government, let it go to lower premiums in general. It is not real healthcare and it should be fixed. If you need it fixed, I can do that.

Yes, but I also believe the government should provide healthcare as a right, as well as private insurance

Should restructure to make more effective and open markets so issuers can compete across state lines to reduce costs

It’s better than before but we need to move to a market oriented fees for service model to reduce costs of healthcare.

There are many arguments that I agree with and disagree with regarding about this. My opinion is mixed.

Yes, but a single payer system would be even better with the option of paying for private health insurance.

Yes, but the government should provide a single payer option. One that would be optional to enroll it but would pay off insurers while retaining and competing with private insurance companies to lower costs.

I've heard varying stances on Obamacare, good, bad, but I feel like a new system of affordable and trustworthy healthcare that actually pays for things should be established. Honestly the government has gotten really corrupt if healthcare and healing isn't available to everyone no matter social/ political status.

Insurers should be allowed to compete across state lines, and the individual mandate should be turned into a tax credit

Yes, I support the concept but I think the execution and logistics of Obamacare isn't productive.

Yes we should work towards having a universal healthcare system and making all medications that one needs so they don't die absolutely free. No one asks to be born with diabetes or with poor eyesight, glasses, insulin and many other things like those two examples should be made free or more affordable.

No, it's a half-measure and should be replaced with a socialized system.

As long as they are getting help and can afford it

No, we need Medicare For All. The ACA is too centrist.

Republicans and Democrats do not get along like they used to when Obama was the president they could have a great healthcare system but the republicans did not want to make a deal and now the same thing is happening with trump so in essance my answer would be yes

i don;t know to be honest i dont even know what obama care is

Diner really care

Yes, healthcare should be focused on universal coverage and not universal healthcare

obama care did not help a lot of people with insurance

It would be great if it worked but it never does

its cool but it like raises taxes and stuff which is kinda bad

yes but it shouldnt be mandatory if someone dosnt want to.

I would need to gather more information on it before I can make a decision

Abolish insurance all together

No, healthcare is a human right and should be 100% covered for all cases.

It should be free. Your income should not be directly correlated with your healthcare accessibility.

No. But only because it's horrendous and didn't work. It's a good sentiment done horribly. Maybe if we weren't so focused on destroying the middle-east... (mainly Afghanistan)

It is great for those individuals who have underlying conditions, and expense a lot in medical bills. On the other hand individuals whom are healthy should be able to chose a more suitable options on the private side with a lower monthly premium.

I support the thing that parents can keep kids on insurance but that’s it

No, but all healthcare should be free

No, and states should be in control of health care or adopt the senate plam

No, insurance is a surrendered freedom to bid of third party donee beneficiaries and forces the asking-price. We should, however, tax employee benefits as we do other income.

Yes, implement single payer

Yes, and we should have Medicare For All funded by reducing administrative costs by 62.5%, prescription drug prices 70%, and stopping overpricing and no funding unnecessary procedures and treatments, as well as cutting hospital costs 30%.

Yes, but reduce the governments control over the healthcare system.

Yes, we should have Medicare For All funded by cost cutting

I don't have enough information to make an answer

Mandatory minimum should be eliminated

Yes, but I support Medicare For All.

The government should not be involved in healthcare except for those who don’t have a job/homeless/poor.

Yes but allow insurers to compete across state lines and reduce costs

Healthcare shall be free for citizens. Ex: Canada

Yes, and Universal Health Care savings would raise 0.702 trillion because we’d reduce administrative costs 62.5%, Hospital costs 30%, and drug costs 70%.

Universal Health Care:The United States Government should spend all $52,000,000,000,000 of health spending in the coming decade. States should be required to spend what they currently spend on healthcare. Then, Medicare For All would lower costs to $47,000,000,000,000, and then eliminate wasteful spending, cut general costs, eliminate overcharging by cutting administrative costs by 5/8 and cutting hospital costs 30%, and cut prescription drug prices by 70%. This would cut spending to
$23,000,000,000,000, and since current federal and state spending would equal $30,000,000,000,000 it would…  Read more save $702,000,000,000 a year, as states would be required to continue spending what they currently spend. Tens of Millions are in poverty because of health costs and being either uninsured or underinsured. Medicare For All would also cover hearing, dental, and vision benefits. Administrative costs would fall to 2.3%, would pay hospitals 110% of what Medicare pays now, as well as ACA era payment reforms, as well as savings from bundled payments, and it would hold cost growth to 2.8-3.9%. This would cut health costs to $2,300,000,000,000 a year. Numerous studies have shown large increases in health utilization, but we already use more than other nations so it seems likely health utilization can be held to a 4% increase. But, what’s more important than the cost, is the improvement in people’s lives. And what is more important than that is people’s lives. Literally, this will save 68,000 lives a year. Health needs to be handled, and this is how we’ll do it:Lower the medicare eligibility age to 0. Dental benefits are necessary because people with straight teeth(no matter how messed up it is)are more likely to get jobs. Vision benefits and hearing benefits are important because these affect people’s lives all the time. Universal Health Care is the 3rd most important thing in the bill, after net zero and a Universal Basic Income. It covers one of the 5 basic necessities, 3 of which(clothing, housing, and food)are covered b

Don’t got any view points

No, abolish Obamacare. Return to the Hill-Burton policy. Enact the World Health Platform.

Insurance as a concept is unnecessary and only harms the general public. Obamacare does not fix the problem.

No, we should have Medicare For all

I think there should be base healthcare for all US citizens that covers only needed health services. If you want more to be covered you can pay for a private health care company.

I support the concept of ACA but not its current funding its very bureaucratic to benefit liberal states.

No, replace it with the AHCA

No, have a public option instead

Yes, and we should have Medicare For All that is funded through cutting administrative costs 62.5% which would happen under a single payer system, cutting hospital costs 30%, cutting prescription drug costs 70%, and deny wasteful (unnecessary spending, spending money when there is no chance of recovery, or getting checked for stuff when there is no chance you have it.)

Yes, and we should have Medicare For All that is funded by cutting prescription drug costs 70%, Cutting administrative costs 62.5%, ending wasteful spending, and cutting hospital costs 30%.