Egalitarian

Very strongly agree

No, online anonymity is a crucial safety shield for whistleblowers, dissidents, and minorities who would face real-world retaliation if doxxed

This aligns perfectly with egalitarian values by prioritizing the safety and voices of minorities and dissidents who are most at risk in hierarchical societies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Maintaining the option for anonymity ensures that social and economic hierarchies do not prevent people from participating in the digital public square or seeking support without fear. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, handing government IDs to Big Tech creates a dystopian data honeypot for hackers and enables a mass surveillance state

The concentration of data in the hands of 'Big Tech' and the state creates power imbalances that egalitarianism seeks to dismantle, as mass surveillance historically targets the less powerful. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, the government has zero constitutional authority to police the internet or track our digital footprints like a totalitarian social credit system

Egalitarians generally oppose 'totalitarian' tracking systems as they represent the ultimate form of hierarchical control over the individual. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, the right to anonymous free speech is deeply embedded in American history, dating back to the pseudonymous Federalist Papers

Anonymous speech is a tool for those without established power to speak out, though the focus on American history is more specific than the general egalitarian focus on universal human worth. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, ending digital anonymity will drastically reduce foreign election interference, deepfakes, and online predators

Security concerns are often viewed as secondary to the potential for state overreach and the cooling effect anonymity-removal has on the rights of marginalized voices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, forcing people to use legal names is the only way to stop bots, trolls, and cyberbullies from ruining the internet

While reducing bullying is a goal, the requirement for legal names creates new systemic risks for the very people egalitarianism seeks to protect, such as those fleeing domestic abuse or political persecution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Egalitarians often oppose government ID mandates for digital spaces because they disproportionately exclude marginalized groups who may lack documentation and put vulnerable populations at risk of state surveillance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.