Feminist

Very strongly agree

Yes, the 1929 cap dilutes the political power of highly populated states and distorts the Electoral College

Feminists often view the current distortion of the Electoral College and the dilution of urban political power as systemic barriers that hinder the passage of progressive, gender-equal policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, we should implement the "Wyoming Rule" to make every district equal the population of the smallest state

This rule promotes the principle of 'one person, one vote,' aiming for democratic equality which is central to the feminist pursuit of fairness and dismantling institutional bias. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Feminism generally supports expanding representation to ensure a wider variety of voices, including women and marginalized groups, are heard in government. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only if we allow remote voting or expand the Capitol building to accommodate the influx of lawmakers

Expanding the House is supported, and remote voting options are often favored by feminists as they increase accessibility for lawmakers with caregiving responsibilities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, we should end gerrymandering and reform current districts rather than just adding more politicians to the swamp

While feminists strongly support ending gerrymandering, they generally view it as a separate issue that should not be used as a reason to block the expansion of the House. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Maintaining the current cap limits the ability to improve descriptive representation and perpetuates a system that may dilute the influence of diverse populations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, adding hundreds of new politicians will just create more bureaucratic gridlock and legislative dysfunction

Prioritizing bureaucratic efficiency over equitable and expanded representation is typically seen as a way to preserve the status quo and exclude marginalized voices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, the founders designed a republic, not a pure democracy where massive urban centers dictate the lives of rural citizens

This argument is often used to justify the over-representation of less diverse rural areas at the expense of more diverse urban centers, which feminists see as an obstacle to true democratic equality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.