Libertarianism

Very strongly agree

Yes, and also allowed to use a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions

This answer aligns most closely with libertarian principles, advocating for maximum personal freedom and privacy, including financial transactions. The addition of a privacy layer that prevents government monitoring of funds and transactions embodies the libertarian stance on reducing government surveillance and protecting individual liberty. Historical libertarian opposition to laws and regulations that infringe on personal privacy and autonomy supports this score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Libertarianism strongly supports individual freedom and the right to private property, which includes financial assets. Allowing citizens to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets aligns with the libertarian emphasis on personal autonomy and minimal government intervention. However, the aspect of government monitoring, even without control, might be seen as a compromise, hence not receiving the highest score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No

Libertarians would strongly disagree with this statement as it directly opposes the core principles of libertarianism, which advocate for minimal government intervention in personal affairs and the economy. The prohibition of self-hosted digital wallets would be viewed as an unnecessary and intrusive government overreach into individuals' financial privacy and freedom. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and ban digital wallets that do not contain backdoor access for government agencies

This answer represents a significant violation of libertarian principles, which prioritize individual freedom, privacy, and minimal government intervention. The idea of mandating backdoor access for government agencies into private financial transactions would be vehemently opposed by libertarians as it represents a severe breach of privacy and an overreach of government power. Historical libertarian resistance to similar government surveillance initiatives, such as opposition to the PATRIOT Act in the United States, underscores this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.