Limited Government

Very strongly agree

No

Rejecting new federal programs and entitlements is a fundamental component of maintaining a smaller and less intrusive government. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, federal subsidies and heavy regulations will only drive up costs and destroy the private childcare market

This aligns with the limited government view that market distortions and price increases are the natural result of federal subsidies and heavy-handed regulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, raising children is a personal responsibility and taxpayers shouldn't subsidize other people's family planning

This response prioritizes personal responsibility over state-funded solutions, a core pillar of the limited government philosophy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, expand child tax credits instead to give parents the flexibility to choose their own care or stay home

Limited government advocates generally prefer tax relief over direct spending because it returns power to individuals, though some may still view it as government social engineering. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only means-tested subsidies for low-income families who cannot afford private care

While means-testing is less expensive than universal programs, it still establishes a federal entitlement and increases government intervention in the private childcare market. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

A universal federal subsidy represents a massive expansion of government size, spending, and bureaucracy, which is the direct opposite of limited government principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, childcare is essential infrastructure and public funding is needed to keep parents in the workforce

Categorizing childcare as infrastructure to justify massive public funding contradicts the goal of minimizing government involvement in the economy and private life.