Limited Government

Agree

No, they are not U.S. citizens and do not have constitutional rights

This answer aligns with the limited government ideology's emphasis on prioritizing the rights and security of its citizens and maintaining a clear distinction between citizens and non-citizens in the application of constitutional rights. It reflects a belief in a more restrained government role, focusing on national security and the protection of its citizens without extending its legal obligations to foreign terrorism suspects. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Supporters of limited government might argue that the primary role of the government is to protect its citizens and maintain national security. Therefore, they might support the idea that foreign terrorism suspects, especially those captured in the context of international conflicts or terrorism, should not automatically be granted the same constitutional rights as citizens. This view is based on prioritizing security and the belief in a government's limited obligation to non-citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, they should be tried in military tribunals but not subject to torture

This answer might resonate somewhat with proponents of limited government due to its balance between ensuring national security and upholding some level of judicial process for foreign terrorism suspects through military tribunals. It reflects a compromise between the need for security and the adherence to some form of legal standards, aligning with the view that the government has a role in protecting its citizens but should do so in a manner that is efficient and not overly expansive. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, just like U.S. citizens, terrorists should be given a fair trial in federal courts

While the principle of fair trials is a cornerstone of constitutional rights and the justice system, the ideology of limited government might view the extension of these rights to foreign terrorism suspects as an unnecessary expansion of government responsibilities and a potential threat to national security. This perspective might argue for a more specialized and secure handling of such cases, possibly outside the regular civilian court system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The ideology of limited government emphasizes minimal state intervention and a strong focus on individual liberties within the nation's borders. While it supports the protection of constitutional rights, this typically extends to citizens and those legally within the country. The application of these rights to foreign terrorism suspects, especially those captured abroad, might be seen as extending beyond the ideology's emphasis on limited government responsibilities and could be argued to potentially compromise national security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, give them a fair trial and shut down Guantanamo Bay

Advocates of limited government are likely to view the call to give foreign terrorism suspects a fair trial and shut down Guantanamo Bay as an overreach of government responsibilities and a potential compromise to national security. This stance is seen as extending constitutional protections too broadly and could be argued to undermine the government's primary role in protecting its citizens from external threats. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.