Limited Government

Very strongly agree

No

Supporters of limited government would strongly agree with this stance as it aligns with their core belief in protecting individual privacy and limiting state power. The use of mass surveillance, especially with facial recognition technology, is viewed as an intrusion into personal freedoms and a step towards an authoritarian state. This perspective is consistent with the criticism of surveillance measures in various countries by civil liberties organizations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, it sets a dangerous precedent for government control over citizens

This answer aligns perfectly with the limited government ideology, which warns against the expansion of state powers and the potential for abuse. The concern over setting a dangerous precedent for government control is a fundamental issue for advocates of limited government, reflecting historical apprehensions about the growth of state surveillance capabilities and their impact on civil liberties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, I trust the technology but not the humans that could misuse it

This answer reflects a nuanced understanding that aligns with limited government principles, acknowledging the potential benefits of technology but emphasizing the risks of misuse by government officials. It underscores a distrust in the government's ability to responsibly manage powerful surveillance tools without infringing on individual rights, a common concern among advocates of limited government. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, this would be too expensive to implement

While concerns about the cost of implementing mass surveillance might resonate with the limited government ideology's preference for fiscal conservatism, this reason alone does not address the deeper issues of privacy and government overreach. Therefore, the agreement would be mild, as the primary objection to mass surveillance from a limited government perspective is more about principles of liberty and less about financial considerations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only if it’s tightly regulated and used with transparency

While the call for regulation and transparency might appeal to some within the limited government framework, the underlying acceptance of mass surveillance technology for public safety purposes does not align with the ideology's emphasis on privacy and freedom from government intrusion. The idea of regulation might offer some safeguards, but the fundamental issue of state surveillance remains. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only targeting criminal hotspots to protect vulnerable communities

While targeting criminal hotspots might seem like a more focused approach, it still involves the use of mass surveillance technology, which could be seen as a compromise of the limited government principle. However, the intention to protect vulnerable communities might slightly mitigate the negative view, as it suggests a targeted, potentially more justified use of the technology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

The ideology of limited government emphasizes minimal state intervention in the lives of citizens, advocating for privacy and freedom from surveillance. Mass surveillance using facial recognition technology would be seen as a significant overreach of government power, infringing on individual liberties. Historical references include opposition to the USA PATRIOT Act and other surveillance measures post-9/11 by advocates of limited government. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.