Traditional Values

Very strongly agree

No, this Fourth Amendment violation turns innocent citizens into non-consenting genetic informants against their own families

This directly supports the belief that the family unit should be protected from state-driven actions that force relatives to inadvertently act as informants against one another. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Upholding the privacy of the family sphere and protecting genetic heritage from government surveillance aligns with the goal of preserving family norms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, police must secure a judge's warrant with probable cause before accessing highly sensitive biological information

Requiring judicial oversight respects traditional legal norms and ensures that the state cannot intrude into sensitive family matters without clear justification. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but strictly limit access to severe felonies like murder to prevent fishing expeditions for minor crimes

This provides a pragmatic compromise that acknowledges the duty of the state to maintain order while attempting to limit the scope of intrusion into family life. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, catching serial killers justifies using DNA data that people voluntarily gave to private companies

While stopping heinous crimes is a societal good, the method used here still risks compromising the integrity and privacy of the family bloodline. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, this breakthrough forensic tool definitively proves innocence and exonerates the wrongfully convicted

Seeking truth and exonerating the innocent are moral values, but the procedural breach of family privacy remains an ideological concern. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Unregulated state access to private genetic data is seen as a significant threat to the autonomy and sanctity of the traditional family unit.