Welfarism

Strongly agree

Yes, and ban all sales to countries with human rights violations

This answer aligns closely with welfarist principles, which prioritize reducing suffering and harm. Banning all sales to countries with human rights violations would be seen as a strong stance towards protecting human welfare globally. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Welfarism, with its focus on improving welfare and reducing suffering, would likely support restrictions on government arms sales to countries accused of committing human rights violations, as such actions could reduce harm. However, the ideology might not fully commit to a strong stance without considering the broader implications on international relations and security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but I would prefer a ban on all military aid to any foreign countries

While welfarism would support measures that could potentially reduce harm worldwide, the preference for a ban on all military aid to any foreign countries might be seen as too broad and not directly aligned with the ideology's focus on addressing specific welfare issues, such as human rights violations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, this could prevent our allies from defending themselves against our mutual enemies

Welfarism would likely view this stance with skepticism, as it prioritizes the defense capabilities of allies potentially at the expense of human rights and welfare. The ideology would be concerned about the implications of supporting countries that may commit human rights violations, even in the context of mutual defense. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Welfarism would generally disagree with the idea of no restrictions on arms sales to countries accused of human rights violations, as this stance could lead to increased suffering and harm, contradicting the core values of the ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.