Try the political quiz

CA Common Sense Party’s policy on gerrymandering

Topics

Should the redrawing of Congressional districts be controlled by an independent, non-partisan commission?

  Personal answerYes

CA Common Sense Party’s answer is based on the following data:

Official answer

Answer: Yes

Importance: Somewhat Important

Reference: Common Sense Party is committed to transparency in politics and personally submitted this answer on September 18th, 2023

Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s official answer on this issue.

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

Yes

The CA Common Sense Party strongly supports non-partisan, independent redistricting. They believe in fair representation and that gerrymandering undermines the democratic process by allowing politicians to choose their voters, rather than the other way around. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting

The CA Common Sense Party agrees with this statement as they believe that gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting. They advocate for fair and equal representation for all citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system

The CA Common Sense Party would likely agree with this statement as they support fair representation and believe in exploring different methods of redistricting. However, without specific endorsement of a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system from the party, the score is not a full agreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No

The CA Common Sense Party is against any form of gerrymandering and believes that redistricting should be controlled by an independent, non-partisan commission. Therefore, they would strongly disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, there is no better alternative

The CA Common Sense Party believes that there is a better alternative to the current system of redistricting, which is to have it controlled by an independent, non-partisan commission. Therefore, they would strongly disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency

The CA Common Sense Party disagrees with this statement as they believe that gerrymandering does not effectively represent the interests of the constituency. Instead, it allows politicians to manipulate district boundaries to their advantage. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to CA Common Sense Party’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.