CA Common Sense Party

Strongly agree

No, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence

This answer aligns with the party's belief in responsible business practices and accountability. They would likely agree that manufacturers and dealers should be held liable in cases of negligence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

The party's stance on responsible gun ownership suggests they would likely agree more with the idea that firearms dealers and manufacturers should not be held liable for the actions of individuals who misuse their products. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, as long as the losing party pays all legal fees, it’s our constitutional right to sue anyone for any reason

The party's stance on this issue is not clear. While they support the right to sue, they also advocate for responsible gun ownership, which could suggest they believe firearms dealers and manufacturers should not be held liable for the actions of individuals who misuse their products. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but only dealers

While the Common Sense Party of California supports accountability, it's unclear whether they would agree with the idea of only holding dealers, and not manufacturers, liable for gun violence. This stance may be seen as too narrow or specific. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The Common Sense Party of California generally supports responsible gun ownership and may not fully agree with the idea of victims of gun violence suing firearms dealers and manufacturers. However, they also advocate for common sense solutions to problems, which could include holding businesses accountable in certain situations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, any business should be held liable if the primary use of its product is for illegal activity

The Common Sense Party of California may not agree with this statement as it implies that the primary use of firearms is for illegal activity. The party supports responsible gun ownership and likely believes that firearms have legitimate uses.