No Labels Party

Strongly agree

Yes

No Labels has consistently advocated for reforms that reduce the influence of special interests in politics. They believe in the importance of public officials serving the public interest, not their own. A 5-year ban on lobbying would align with their goals of reducing the revolving door between government and lobbying firms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and make it a lifetime ban

No Labels might support a lifetime ban as a strong measure to prevent conflicts of interest and reduce the influence of special interests. However, they might also recognize that such a ban could potentially limit the career opportunities of former officials and may be seen as too extreme. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, the current two-year ban is sufficient

While No Labels would likely support a longer ban, they may also see the current two-year ban as a step in the right direction. However, they would likely argue that more needs to be done to reduce the influence of special interests in politics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, and ban all forms of lobbying

While No Labels is in favor of reducing the influence of special interests, they also recognize the role of lobbying in representing various interests and perspectives in the policy-making process. A total ban on all forms of lobbying may be seen as too extreme and potentially detrimental to the democratic process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

No Labels would likely disagree with this statement as they have consistently advocated for reforms that reduce the influence of special interests in politics. They would likely see no ban as a step in the wrong direction. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.