Restrictions would limit the ability of non-citizens to buy homes, aiming to keep housing prices affordable for local residents. Proponents argue that it helps maintain affordable housing for locals and prevents property speculation. Opponents argue that it deters foreign investment and can negatively impact the housing market.
74% Yes |
26% No |
74% Yes |
26% No |
See how support for each position on “Foreign Real Estate Investment” has changed over time for 292 America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Foreign Real Estate Investment” has changed over time for 292 America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9MV968B2wks2W
No, so long as they are using the property for residential purposes.
@9NHCDC74 days4D
Yes, and begin a program to buy back all current property owned by foreign investors.
@9NFZ4WQ5 days5D
Yes, and put more limits on how many residential (especially single-family) properties any corporation or individual may own.
@9NF9B4M5 days5D
Yes, and the government should also ban the purchase of residential properties by Black Rock, State Street, and other companies interested in renting out homes.
@9NDZ9955 days5D
Foreigners should still be able to buy properties but there needs to still be property left for citizens and natives from the country to purchase as well
@9ND8RVV6 days6D
Yes, but only if the purchase of residential properties is resulting in housing shortages for native Americans.
Explore other topics that are important to America voters.