Ride-sharing services, like Uber and Lyft, provide transportation options that can be subsidized to make them more affordable for low-income individuals. Proponents argue that it increases mobility for low-income individuals, reduces reliance on personal vehicles, and can reduce traffic congestion. Opponents argue that it is a misuse of public funds, may benefit ride-sharing companies more than individuals, and could discourage public transportation use.
38% Yes |
62% No |
38% Yes |
62% No |
See how support for each position on “Ride-Sharing Subsidies” has changed over time for 230 America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Ride-Sharing Subsidies” has changed over time for 230 America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9NHQWT54 days4D
No, but because public transit should receive the attention.
@9NH6JJJ 4 days4D
Yes, but only for certain situations (e.g. job, healthcare, etc.) and if public transit isn't sufficient.
@9NG23ZY5 days5D
No, but make public transportation more affordable and accessible
@9NFQ4S6 5 days5D
Yes, only for certain situations and if public transit is not sufficient
@9NFG6YX5 days5D
No, we should focus on improving public transportation rather than subsidizing private transportation.
@9NFF24M5 days5D
Yes, public transportation is unreliable when it's even available.
Explore other topics that are important to America voters.