Distracted driving penalties aim to deter dangerous behaviors, such as texting while driving, to improve road safety. Proponents argue that it deters dangerous behavior, improves road safety, and reduces accidents caused by distractions. Opponents argue that penalties alone may not be effective and enforcement can be challenging.
68% Yes |
32% No |
68% Yes |
32% No |
See how support for each position on “Distracted Driving Penalties” has changed over time for 260 America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Distracted Driving Penalties” has changed over time for 260 America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9MPYFLR2wks2W
No, but it should provide tax breaks for buyers of cars with technology that allows drivers to interface with their smartphones via the entertainment system instead of holding their phones in their hands
@9NF9B4M6 days6D
Yes, I agree in theory but I am wary of how this would be implemented in practice
@9NCVR3K7 days7D
Yes, higher fines and suspended license for people who are distracted. Treat them as if someone is DUI. It is just the same amount of danger
@9N295MR 7 days7D
Yes, but it's hard to prove distracted driving in court.
@99M6G59 2wks2W
No, this should be decided at the state and local level instead of by the federal government
@9NBNRNN 1wk1W
No, but all new cars should be required to have driving assists like FSD Tesla Musk Elon
Explore other topics that are important to America voters.
