Restorative justice programs focus on rehabilitating offenders through reconciliation with victims and the community, rather than through traditional incarceration. These programs often involve dialogue, restitution, and community service. Proponents argue that restorative justice reduces recidivism, heals communities, and provides more meaningful accountability for offenders. Opponents argue that it may not be suitable for all crimes, could be perceived as too lenient, and may not adequately deter future criminal behavior.
63% Yes |
37% No |
63% Yes |
37% No |
See how support for each position on “Restorative Justice Programs” has changed over time for 1.2k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Restorative Justice Programs” has changed over time for 1.2k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9NCYWRC7 days7D
Yes, and the program should be comprehensive, and understanding of the fact relapses will happen, and work with offenders to form better habits and make better informed choices to prevent said relapses.
@9MMTZV23wks3W
yes but only if they have a good reason not be be incarcerated like if they have a dog or kids and the crime was not that severe (dog qualifies for animal cruelty reasons)
@9MMBKGM3wks3W
Yes, but only if it is apparent that the person who they are trying to rehabilitate wants to be rehabilitated.
@9MMB43J3wks3W
Yes, but it depends on the severity of the offense committed
@9MM9JCB3wks3W
yes if the crime if the person isn't a mass murderer or pedo/mass sexual assualter
@9MM7YD73wks3W
I truly think it depends on the case, the person, and the background of what happened.
Explore other topics that are important to America voters.
