Try the political quiz
@ISIDEWITHQuestionsSocial IssuesStarted 2yrs agoActive 2wks ago

Should major public events include land acknowledgment statements?

Land acknowledgments have become increasingly common nationwide over the past few years. Many mainstream public events — from soccer games and performing arts productions to city council meetings and corporate conferences — begin with these formal statements recognizing Indigenous communities' rights to territories seized by colonial powers. The 2024 Democratic National Convention began with an introduction reminding delegates how the convention is being held on land that was "forcibly removed" from Indigenous tribes. Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation Tribal Council Vice-Chairman Zach Pahmahmie and Tribal Council Secretary Lorrie Melchior took to the stage at the start of the convention where they welcomed the Democratic Party to their "ancestral homelands."

+
Expand
+ Settings x  Constitution Party

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 220 Constitution Party voters.

19%
Yes
81%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 220 Constitution Party voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 220 Constitution Party voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Constitution Party voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9TR9MX5 from Michigan  answered…2yrs2Y

While land acknowledgment is vital, making grand and generalized statements in public gatherings helps no one. Give the land back.

 @9ZBHJWD from New York  answered…2yrs2Y

The property can have plaques and educational resources but acknowledgment statements during events are not necessary

 @B6GYJQ3 from Virginia  answered…10mos10MO

Maybe just give the people whose land we took money and put up a sign. Maybe do an announcement at big events.

 @B7JCZXV from Ohio  answered…9mos9MO

Yes, If it is directly involved with something to do with what the land or tribe was about originally, not if it is simply being used for another reason.

 @9TVP5KJ from Texas  answered…2yrs2Y

I feel that the amount of emphasis placed on it should be reduced, but it is never a bad thing to aknowledge those who came before us.

 @9TRD4HS from California  answered…2yrs2Y

Acknowledging the history of the land, and how we got it, is important but how does it really help anyone to just point out that fact and make generalized apologetic statements but take no action. Most if not all of the land owned by countries today was taken from another country/people at some point or another(the morality of this is a different topic). And these land were not just seized by 'colonial powers' but also taken after the United States was formed (and had it's independence) by the United States.

 @BDXHCHJ from Georgia  answered…2wks2W

i feel like efforts would be better in trying to make indigenous people feel like welcomed members of American society while still holding on to their own identities as sovereign nations my concern with things like this is we make native people feel like relics of a past time instead of thriving people

 @BDXH46F from Virginia  answered…2wks2W

Land acknowledgments do not change the relations of production

Popular Conversations

Join in on the most popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…2yrs2Y

Israeli Bombings Kill 2,300 In Lebanon in 3 weeks

Lebanese authorities say Israeli bombing has killed more than 2,300 people and injured almost 11,000, mostly in the past three weeks, with Israeli attacks reaching areas far beyond Hizbollah’s traditional bastions of support in the south.The Israeli military has ordered people living in more than a quarter of Lebanon to flee, according to a UN calculation, as its fight with the Iran-backed Shia militant group Hizbollah threatens to engulf the Mediterranean country.Lebanese authorities say Israeli bombing has killed more than 2,300 people and injured almost 11,000, mostly in the past three weeks, with Israeli attacks reaching areas far beyond Hizbollah’s traditional bastions of support in the south.More than 1mn people have fled their homes in Lebanon in under a month, according to its government, a dramatic forced movement of the population in a country of only about 5mn inhabitants with a land mass smaller than the US state of Connecticut. Israeli forces began a ground offensive in south Lebanon two weeks ago, in their fourth invasion of the country in under five decades. They had already destroyed large parts of the densely populated southern Beirut suburb where Hizbollah had its headquarters, and killed many top militant commanders in air strikes, including former leader Hassan Nasrallah.Rema Jamous Imseis, Middle East director of UNHCR, told journalists in Geneva that “over 25 per cent of [Lebanon is] under a direct Israeli military evacuation order”. “People are heeding these calls to evacuate and they’re fleeing with almost nothing,” she added, saying that 80 per cent of the shelters opened by the Lebanese government — mostly in schools — were now full.

▲  1012 replies

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…2yrs2Y

A Moment of Darkness': Washington Post's No-Endorsement Decision Ignites Media Firestorm

Even though the presidential race between former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris is neck and neck, The Washington Post has decided not to make a presidential endorsement for the first time in 36 years, the publisher and CEO announced Friday."We are returning to our roots of not endorsing presidential candidates," Will Lewis wrote in an opinion piece published on the paper's website. He referenced the paper's policy in the decades prior to 1976, when, following the Watergate scandal that the Post broke, it endorsed Democratic nominee Jimmy Carter. The last time the Post did not endorse a presidential candidate in the general election was 1988, according to a search of its archives.Colleagues learned the news from the editorial page editor, David Shipley, at a tense meeting shortly before Lewis' announcement. The meeting was characterized by someone with direct knowledge of discussions on condition of anonymity to speak about internal matters.Shipley said that he told other editorial board leaders Thursday by management that there would be no endorsement, though he has known for weeks. He added that he "owns" this decision. The reason he cited was to create "independent space" where the newspaper does not tell people for whom to vote.Colleagues were said to be "shocked" and uniformly negative. Post corporate spokespeople have not responded to multiple messages left by NPR on the subject.Former Washington Post Executive Editor Martin Baron, who led the newsroom to acclaim during Trump's presidency, denounced the decision starkly."This is cowardice, a moment of darkness that will leave democracy as a casualty," Baron said in a statement to NPR. "Donald Trump will celebrate this as an invitation to further intimidate The Post’s owner, Jeff Bezos (and other media owners). History will mark a disturbing chapter of spinelessness at an institution famed for courage."A similar decision by Los Angeles Times owner Patrick Soon-Shiong led this week to the resignations of the paper's editorials editor and two editorial board members. Soon-Shiong said that he had asked the editorial board to draft a "factual analysis" of Trump and Harris' policies and plans. In her resignation letter, editorials editor Mariel Garza said the decision made the paper look “craven and hypocritical,” given its past reporting and editorials on Trump.

▲  1013 replies

About This Data

Based on 220 responses to this question.

These results come from iSideWith's ongoing political issues survey. We collect over a million responses per day, filter out duplicate and multiple submissions, and break the results down by political party, ideology, age, state, and census demographics (income, race, education, household).

iSideWith is non-partisan — we don't advocate for any party, candidate, or position. We report what the public tells us.

Read Our Full Methodology →

Cite Or Embed This Poll

Writing about this issue? Use the live data and link back to the full results.

Cite This Poll

iSideWith. (2026). “Should major public events include land acknowledgment statements?” — Public Opinion Poll Results. Retrieved June 17, 2026, from https://www.isidewith.com/poll/5265493959

Embed The Live Result

Preview