Try the political quiz
@ISIDEWITHQuestionsthe EconomyInflationEconomic policyConsumer ProtectionShrinkflationRetail Business•••Started 3mos agoActive 3wks ago

Should the government ban companies from reducing product size without lowering the price?

Shrinkflation is when a company reduces the size or quantity of a product while keeping the price the same, such as a lighter bag of chips or a shorter candy bar. While not illegal, critics call it a deceptive practice that hides the true rate of inflation from consumers. Proponents of regulation argue it protects consumers and promotes price transparency. Opponents argue it's a legitimate response to rising supply costs and that government regulation would be an overreach into private business decisions.

+
Expand
+ Settings x  Virginia

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 344 Virginia voters.

58%
Yes
35%
No
51%
Yes
29%
No
4%
Yes, shrinkflation is a sneaky way for corporations to hide inflation and mislead shoppers
5%
No, companies must be free to adjust product sizes to manage their own rising costs
3%
Yes, and require clear price per unit labeling so any size change is immediately obvious
1%
No, it's better than raising the sticker price, which can hurt families on a tight budget

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 344 Virginia voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 344 Virginia voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Virginia voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @BB8YGLG  from North Carolina  answered…3mos3MO

No, but require clear price per unit labeling so any size change is immediately obvious and add a label saying smaller size for the next six months

 @BD6XCY7  from New Hampshire  answered…3wks3W

No, but companies should be required to advertise any changes in product formulas and sizes.

 @BD6XCY7  from New Hampshire  answered…1mo1MO

No but companies must be open about when they reduce the amount of product in goods.

 @BD266KF from California  answered…1mo1MO

people can spend there money as they wish

 @BCTL5H7 from Missouri  answered…2mos2MO

Yes, because we are a mixed economy the government has some control over product regulation. In a mixed market economy, the government acts as a regulator and safety net rather than a total commander.

 @BCT5996 from Massachusetts  answered…2mos2MO

No it’s the customers choice to buy the product

 @BCS4334 from California  answered…2mos2MO

no, but require clear labelling so consumers know.

  @GenericSocBert  from Pennsylvania  answered…2mos2MO

No, but make them provide a temporary label instead.

Popular Conversations

Join in on the most popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…2yrs2Y

Trump's Deportation Storm: America Braces for Mass Exodus of Immigrants

For months, immigration advocates have been planning for the possibility of Donald Trump’s return to the White House. Now, their worst fears have arrived.Immigrants’ rights groups have spent the last year preparing for a second Trump term and an overhaul of the nation’s immigration system, analyzing Trump’s proposals, drafting legal briefs, coordinating messaging and organizing aid for immigrants and asylum seekers. They responded to Trump’s victory with alarm and vowed to put up a fight, setting the stage for four more years of contentious court battles with his administration.Some are already preparing to push current leadership at the Department of Homeland Security to take steps to stymie the incoming Trump team, particularly on immigrant detention and the use of AI in enforcement.“We should expect to see the devastation of immigrant communities all over the country. We should expect to see family separation,” said Kica Matos, the president of the National Immigration Law Center. “It is entirely possible that he will try to use the military to carry out deportations, so that means that Americans all over the country will see the military engaging in enforcement against civilian populations, which is horrifying.”Trump, after winning a historic victory on a platform of turbo-charged immigration enforcement, has said he will conduct mass deportations at a scale never before seen. Immigrant advocates have warned this would be expensive and inhumane, separating families and wrecking communities. The president-elect has also vowed to build huge detention camps, hire thousands more border agents, funnel military spending toward border security and invoke the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to expel suspected members of drug cartels and criminal gangs without court hearings.He has also said he would end “catch-and-release” — allowing migrants to remain free, often with monitoring, while they await immigration court hearings — and restore a policy from his first term requiring asylum seekers to remain in Mexico while their cases are processed. And he has dodged questions about whether he would try to bring back family separation.

▲  4333 replies