More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Income ($100K-$150K) voters
Last answered 12 seconds ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Income ($100K-$150K) voters.
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Dec 12, 2011. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Income data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011).
Choose a demographic filter
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
5 years ago by sciencealert.com.au
6 years ago by deccanchronicle.com
6 years ago by youtube.com
6 years ago by youtube.com
7 years ago by youtube.com
7 years ago by cnsnews.com
Data based on unique submissions (duplicates or multiple submissions are eliminated) per user using a 30-day moving average to reduce daily variance from traffic sources. Totals may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
More stances on this issue
Don't add anymore offshore oil drilling and when oil is depleted in that location then remove the oil rigs. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Riverview, FL
Yes, to create jobs- but no, and maintain our current ones but keep a limit to up keep the environment. 6 years ago from a Republican in Wooldridge, MO
No, because we already have a huge oil supply that is nowhere near empty and the idea of running low on oil is only there as an excuse to drastically increase the price of oil. 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Richland, WA
We should open up the thousands of the gas and oil wells that have been capped over the years. I used to work in the oil field and I know that there is enough gas and oil in the United States to last the world thousands of years. 6 years ago from a Republican in Altoona, IA
Regulate and let the free market determine the business viability of offshore drilling given the costly safety assurances and liabilities associated. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Dallas, TX
No, because we have enough oil already in the country. 6 years ago from a Libertarian in East Petersburg, PA
Why is this an option? Who are you people and why did you START doing this?. 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Potwin, KS
Yes,expand offshore drilling and other enery assets we possess in this country to include coal, but also promote and give incentives to the private sector to develop alternate energy sources and let the market dictate and choose it's preferences. 6 years ago from a Republican in Fulton, CA
Yes but must be very carefully regulated. 6 years ago from a Republican in Pleasanton, CA
Use our own oil, instead of borrowing from other countries. At the same time, alternative fuels must be developed. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Dover, NJ
Yes, but limit expansion. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Owens Cross Roads, AL
Let private sector decide based upon economic return subject scientifically supported environmental safeguards. 6 years ago from a Republican in Edison, NJ
We have enough resources in our country to make our own energy to not have to rely on foreign countries for our energy. 6 years ago from a Republican in Barre, VT
The energy sector should be owned by the public, but divided up into regional or local divisions, while we don't expand and maintain current offshore oil wells. 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Santa Maria, CA
Do you remember the oil spill? It killed and injured thousands of innocent animals. It suffocated them, and poisoned their stomachs with oil. It caused families of water animals to become weak and drown from the spill. If you looked at what the spill did... 6 years ago from a Republican in Laconia, NH
With extremely strict environmental, technical, structural, and operational oversight by the Federal government, it can be done safely, however the penalties for damages to the environment need to be FAR higher. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Raritan, NJ
We studied all the ethanol, we dont need to disrupt the natural world. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Columbia, MO
More investigation needs to be done regarding this matter. Because I don't know how much of our actual supply is currently being supplied by off shore drilling.....& Can it be environmentaly Safe ??. 6 years ago from a Republican in Potwin, KS
No, we should end off-shore drilling- it clearly has a terrible impact on the environment. Incentivize schmentivize, energy companies should be smart enough to invest in exploring alternative energy sources. The government should be working with... 6 years ago from a Democrat in Ingomar, PA
If we could drill within our own nation first before offshore drilling, then that would be efficient for the money as well as environment and prevent less international issues. 6 years ago from a Republican in Wichita Falls, TX
Yes, as long as regulations are met to keep the environment and workers safe. 6 years ago from a Republican in The Dalles, OR
No, offshore oil drilling should stop, because sea creatures were meant to live in peace in their home. Earth is our home, I'm sure we wouldn't know what to do if our home was being destroyed. we would run, but we would mostly ask for a chance... 6 years ago from a Green in Prather, CA
Yes, but with regulation that makes oil companies fully responsible for any big oil spill doesn't happen again. 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Chevy Chase, DC
Yes, but not yet. As worldwide reserves dwindle with time, our offshore supplies will become strategic and economic assets of immesurable value. While we have the wealth to purchase this irreplaceble resource form sources abroad, let us do so, then make... 6 years ago from a Republican in Potwin, KS