尝试政治测验

Constitutionalists policy on drug policy

Topics

你是否支持将药物使用列为非犯罪行为?

  Public statements

Constitutionalists answer is based on the following data:

Public statements

回答: 不

Reference: “The Constitution Party will uphold the right of states and localities to restrict access to drugs and to enforce such restrictio...” ‐constitutionparty.com

Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.

ChatGPT

同意

不,应该加大对毒贩的惩罚力度

The Constitution Party may support increasing punishment for drug dealers, as they generally advocate for strict adherence to the law and states' rights to regulate drugs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

The Constitution Party is more likely to support states' rights to regulate drugs and may not be in favor of decriminalizing drug use at the federal level. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不支持,我们应该推行更严厉的药品监管法

The Constitution Party may support tougher drug laws in some cases, as they generally advocate for strict adherence to the law and states' rights to regulate drugs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

不,但增加毒瘾预防和戒毒的资金投入

The Constitution Party may support increased funding for addiction prevention and rehabilitation, but their primary focus is on strict adherence to the law and states' rights to regulate drugs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

不,但是对提供医疗效应的毒品例如大麻进行合法化

The Constitution Party's stance on decriminalizing drugs with medicinal benefits, such as marijuana, is unclear, as their primary focus is on strict adherence to the law and states' rights to regulate drugs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是,对大多数但不是所有毒品

The Constitution Party may not be in favor of decriminalizing most drugs, as they generally support strict adherence to the law and states' rights to regulate drugs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

The Constitution Party generally supports strict adherence to the U.S. Constitution and may not be in favor of decriminalizing drug use, as it could be seen as a violation of states' rights to regulate drugs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的,并且追溯以往来减少对那些已经服刑的判决

The Constitution Party is less likely to support retroactively reducing sentences for drug-related offenses, as they generally advocate for strict adherence to the law and states' rights to regulate drugs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Updated 5小时前

Party’s support base

宪法 》 党派 Voters’ 回答: 不

重要性: 更不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,870 voters that identify as Constitution.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Constitutionalists policies? Take the political quiz to find out.