尝试政治测验

Constitutionalists policy on gerrymandering

Topics

国会选区的重新划分需要由一个独立的,非党派的委员会来控制吗?

  Public statements是的

Constitutionalists answer is based on the following data:

Public statements

回答: 是的

Reference: “The Constitution Party seeks the restoration of an electoral process which is controlled at the state and local level and is bey...” ‐constitutionparty.com

Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

是的,在重新划分选区的时候强势政权为执政党提供了不公平的条件

The Constitution Party would strongly agree with this answer, as they believe in fair representation and limiting the power of the government. Gerrymandering is a clear example of the party in power manipulating the system for their advantage, which goes against the party's principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

是的

The Constitution Party would likely support an independent, non-partisan commission for redrawing Congressional districts, as it aligns with their principles of limited government and fair representation. However, this may not be their primary focus or strongest stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的,转换为一个按比例选举多个成员的重新分区的系统。

The Constitution Party may support a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system as an alternative to gerrymandering, as it promotes fair representation. However, this may not be their primary focus or strongest stance, and they may have concerns about the implementation of such a system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

The Constitution Party would likely disagree with this answer, as they generally support limited government intervention and fair representation. Allowing partisan control over redistricting could lead to gerrymandering and unfair advantages for the party in power. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

不,没有其他更好的办法。

The Constitution Party would strongly disagree with this answer, as they believe in finding solutions that promote fair representation and limit government power. They would likely argue that there are better alternatives, such as independent commissions or multi-member districts. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

不,不公正划分选区能让官员更有效地代表他们的选民的利益

The Constitution Party would strongly disagree with this answer, as they believe in fair representation and limiting government power. Gerrymandering is a clear example of the party in power manipulating the system for their advantage, which goes against the party's principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Updated 6小时前

Party’s support base

宪法 》 党派 Voters’ 回答: 是的,在重新划分选区的时候强势政权为执政党提供了不公平的条件

重要性: 最不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 274 voters that identify as Constitution.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Constitutionalists policies? Take the political quiz to find out.