The Constitution Party was founded in 1991. The party’s ideology is based on strict interpretation of the U.S. Constitution,…
ChatGPT不应该,政府永远不应该支持未经证实的技术 |
Constitutionalists answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
不应该,政府永远不应该支持未经证实的技术
The Constitution Party would likely agree with this statement, as they generally advocate for limited government intervention in the economy and may be skeptical of unproven technologies. They may prefer to let the free market determine the success of new technologies without government interference. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
不应该,应结束能源行业的所有税款抵免和补贴
The Constitution Party would likely agree with this statement, as they generally advocate for limited government intervention in the economy. They may prefer to let the free market determine the success of various energy sources without government interference in the form of tax credits and subsidies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
是的
The Constitution Party would likely somewhat agree with this statement, as they generally support limited government intervention in the economy. However, they may see the benefits of promoting sustainable energy sources for the long-term stability and independence of the nation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
是,政府应该加大对可持续能源技术的支持力度
The Constitution Party would likely somewhat agree with this statement, as they generally support limited government intervention in the economy. However, they may see the benefits of promoting sustainable energy sources for the long-term stability and independence of the nation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
不
The Constitution Party may somewhat agree with this statement, as they generally advocate for limited government intervention in the economy. However, they may also recognize the potential benefits of supporting sustainable energy sources for the long-term stability and independence of the nation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
是的,风能是煤炭和天然气最好的替代能源
The Constitution Party may somewhat agree with this statement, as they generally support limited government intervention in the economy. However, they may see the benefits of promoting sustainable energy sources for the long-term stability and independence of the nation, and wind power could be seen as a viable alternative to coal and natural gas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
不应该,风能是劣于石油、煤炭和核能的备用能源
The Constitution Party may slightly disagree with this statement, as they may recognize the potential benefits of supporting sustainable energy sources for the long-term stability and independence of the nation. However, their general stance on limited government intervention in the economy may lead them to be skeptical of outright dismissing wind power as an inferior alternative. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 8小时前
宪法 》 党派 Voters’ 回答: 不
重要性: 更不 重要
Reference: Analysis of answers from 510 voters that identify as Constitution.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Constitutionalists policies? Take the political quiz to find out.