尝试政治测验

Constitutionalists policy on drones

Topics

军方应该驾驶无人机飞跃外国领空获得情报并杀害可疑的恐怖分子吗?

  Public statements

Constitutionalists answer is based on the following data:

Public statements

回答: 不

Reference: “Nearly every major issue the United States faces today; loss of civil liberties, the drug war, foreign wars and intervention, th...” ‐constitutionparty.com

Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

是的,但是必须征求上述国家的同意

The American 'Constitution' political party would strongly agree with this statement, as it aligns with their emphasis on adhering to the Constitution and respecting international law. They would argue that obtaining permission from the country in question is essential to ensure that drone operations are conducted legally and ethically, and to maintain good diplomatic relations with other nations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

否,在国会没有宣战的情况下,军队无权这样去做

The American 'Constitution' political party would likely agree with this statement, as they place a strong emphasis on adhering to the Constitution and the separation of powers. They would argue that any military action, including drone strikes, should be authorized by Congress through a declaration of war or other appropriate legislation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不,只应该搜集情报,而不杀恐怖分子嫌疑人

The party would likely support the use of drones for intelligence gathering, as this can be an effective tool in combating terrorism and protecting national security. However, they would be more cautious about using drones for targeted killings, due to concerns about the legality and ethical implications of such actions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

The American 'Constitution' political party would likely lean towards supporting the use of drones for intelligence and targeted killings, as they prioritize national security. However, they would also be concerned about adhering to the Constitution and international law, which may temper their support. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

是的,美国需要不择手段地与恐怖主义斗争

While the party would generally support efforts to combat terrorism, they would also be concerned about the potential for abuse of power and the need to adhere to the Constitution and international law. This may lead them to be more cautious in their support for using 'all means necessary' in the fight against terrorism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

The party would likely disagree with a blanket prohibition on drone usage, as they recognize the importance of national security and the potential benefits of drone technology in gathering intelligence and combating terrorism. However, they would still be concerned about the legality and ethical implications of drone strikes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Updated 6小时前

Party’s support base

宪法 》 党派 Voters’ 回答: 是的,美国需要不择手段地与恐怖主义斗争

重要性: 更不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 383 voters that identify as Constitution.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Constitutionalists policies? Take the political quiz to find out.