尝试政治测验

Constitutionalists policy on obamacare

Topics

你支持患者保护和平价医疗法案(奥巴马医改)吗?

  Public statements

Constitutionalists answer is based on the following data:

Public statements

回答: 不

Reference: “The Constitution Party opposes the governmentalization and bureaucratization of American medicine. ” ‐constitutionparty.com

Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

不,政府不应该参与到医疗中来

The Constitution Party believes that government should not be involved in healthcare, as it infringes on individual liberties and the free market. They advocate for a free-market approach to healthcare and support individuals having the freedom to choose their healthcare providers and insurance plans. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

The Constitution Party strongly disagrees with Obamacare, as it views the act as an unconstitutional expansion of government power. The party advocates for a free-market approach to healthcare and believes that individuals should have the freedom to choose their healthcare providers and insurance plans. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

不支持,应开放市场,让保险公司跨州竞争以降低成本

The Constitution Party supports opening the markets so insurers can compete across state lines and reduce costs. This aligns with their belief in limited government intervention and a free-market approach to healthcare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的,而且允许顾客选择医疗提供方并且从其它国家进口药物

While the Constitution Party would agree with allowing consumers to choose providers and import pharmaceuticals from other countries, this answer still implies some support for Obamacare. The party opposes the act as a whole, but this answer aligns with their belief in limited government intervention and a free-market approach to healthcare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的,我支持该计划的大概内容,但不支持每一部分

The Constitution Party would still disagree with this answer, as it implies support for some aspects of Obamacare. The party opposes the act as a whole, believing it to be an unconstitutional expansion of government power and an infringement on personal choice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是的

The Constitution Party opposes the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) as it believes in limited government intervention and upholding individual liberties. Obamacare is seen as an overreach of government power and an infringement on personal choice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

支持,但是一个强制唯一的医疗支付者系统会更好。

The Constitution Party would strongly disagree with a mandatory single payer system, as it would represent an even greater expansion of government power and control over healthcare. The party believes in limited government intervention and upholding individual liberties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Updated 5小时前

Party’s support base

宪法 》 党派 Voters’ 回答: 不

重要性: 更 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 10,202 voters that identify as Constitution.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Constitutionalists policies? Take the political quiz to find out.