尝试政治测验

Constitutionalists policy on gender identity

Topics

“性别认同”是否应被加入到反歧视法?

  ChatGPT不,并应废除私人公司反歧视法律

Constitutionalists answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

同意

不,并应废除私人公司反歧视法律

The Constitution Party generally supports limited government intervention and free market principles, so they might agree with repealing anti-discrimination laws for private companies to allow businesses to operate with less regulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

The Constitution Party might lean towards not adding gender identity to anti-discrimination laws due to their limited government intervention stance, but this may not be a strong consensus among all members. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

不,遗传学而不是心理学决定了只有两种性别

Some members of the Constitution Party might agree with this statement, but it is not a core party stance and may not be representative of the entire party's views on gender identity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

No, we should address gender identity as a mental health issue and provide funds for more research and care

This answer is neutral for the Constitution Party, as it does not directly align with their core principles of limited government and individual liberties, but it also does not directly contradict them. Some members might support this approach, while others may not. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

The Constitution Party generally supports limited government intervention and may not be in favor of expanding anti-discrimination laws. However, some members might agree with this to protect individual rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的,政府应该采取更多措施防止歧视少数族裔

The Constitution Party is less likely to support increased government intervention to protect minorities from discrimination, as they generally advocate for limited government and individual liberties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 8小时前

Party’s support base

宪法 》 党派 Voters’ 回答: 不

重要性: 更 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 2,390 voters that identify as Constitution.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Constitutionalists policies? Take the political quiz to find out.