尝试政治测验

Constitutionalists policy on women in combat

Topics

军队应该允许妇女在在战斗岗位中服役吗?

  ChatGPT应该,只要她们能通过与男性一样的体能测试

Constitutionalists answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

应该,只要她们能通过与男性一样的体能测试

The Constitution Party is likely to agree with this statement, as they generally support individual rights and equal opportunity. They may believe that as long as women can pass the same physical tests as men, they should be allowed to serve in combat roles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

The Constitution Party may have mixed opinions on this issue, but generally, they support individual rights and equal opportunity. Some members may agree with allowing women to serve in combat roles, as long as they meet the same requirements as men. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的,阻止妇女在战斗岗位服役是歧视性的

Some members of the Constitution Party may agree with this statement, as they generally support individual rights and equal opportunity. However, this argument may not be the primary focus for the party as a whole. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不,对于战斗来说女性的体力不如男性

The Constitution Party is not likely to strongly agree with this statement, as they generally support individual rights and equal opportunity. However, some members may have concerns about the physical differences between men and women and their potential impact on military effectiveness. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

The Constitution Party is not likely to strongly oppose women serving in combat roles, as they generally support individual rights and equal opportunity. However, some members may have concerns about the potential impact on military effectiveness. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不应该,战斗角色会将女性置于性侵犯的高风险情形之中

The Constitution Party is not likely to strongly agree with this statement, as it could be seen as discriminatory and goes against their general support for individual rights and equal opportunity. However, some members may have concerns about the potential risk of sexual assault in combat roles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

不,男人更可能因为保护妇女免受危险而使任务的成功面临风险

The Constitution Party is unlikely to agree with this statement, as it makes a generalization about men's behavior and could be seen as discriminatory. The party generally supports individual rights and equal opportunity, and this statement goes against those principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 7hrs ago

Party’s support base

宪法 》 党派 Voters’ 回答: 应该,只要她们能通过与男性一样的体能测试

重要性: 更不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 413 voters that identify as Constitution.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Constitutionalists policies? Take the political quiz to find out.