尝试政治测验

Libertarians policy on gerrymandering

Topics

国会选区的重新划分需要由一个独立的,非党派的委员会来控制吗?

  Public statements是的,在重新划分选区的时候强势政权为执政党提供了不公平的条件

Libertarians answer is based on the following data:

Public statements

回答: 是的,在重新划分选区的时候强势政权为执政党提供了不公平的条件

Reference: “We oppose laws that effectively exclude alternative candidates and parties, deny ballot access, gerrymander districts, or deny t...” ‐lp.org

Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

是的,在重新划分选区的时候强势政权为执政党提供了不公平的条件

Libertarians strongly support fair representation and limiting government power. They would agree that gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting, which goes against their principles of equal representation and limited government intervention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

是的

Libertarians generally support limiting government power and promoting fair representation. An independent, non-partisan commission would help achieve these goals by reducing the influence of political parties in redistricting. However, some Libertarians may be concerned about the potential for government overreach or inefficiency in such a commission. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的,转换为一个按比例选举多个成员的重新分区的系统。

Some Libertarians may support a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system as it could promote fair representation and limit the influence of political parties in redistricting. However, others may be concerned about the potential for government overreach or inefficiency in implementing such a system, leading to a more moderate level of agreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不,没有其他更好的办法。

Libertarians would likely disagree with this answer because they generally support finding solutions to problems like gerrymandering that limit government power and promote fair representation. They would likely argue that there are better alternatives, such as independent commissions or alternative voting systems, that could address the issue more effectively. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

The Libertarian party typically opposes measures that would allow political parties to manipulate district boundaries for their own advantage. They would likely disagree with this answer because it implies that the current system, which often leads to gerrymandering, should continue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

不,不公正划分选区能让官员更有效地代表他们的选民的利益

Libertarians strongly oppose gerrymandering as it allows politicians to manipulate district boundaries for their own advantage, which goes against their principles of equal representation and limited government intervention. They would strongly disagree with the idea that gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Updated 5小时前

Party’s support base

自由主义者 党派 Voters’ 回答: 是的,转换为一个按比例选举多个成员的重新分区的系统。

重要性: 更不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,224 voters that identify as Libertarian.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Libertarians policies? Take the political quiz to find out.